Go back
Technocracy, Inc.:  Urbanates

Technocracy, Inc.: Urbanates

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
The problem with what is not the density?

Population density causes problems. More people means less street parking, smaller apartments, more conflict between people, more competition for everything. It makes disease spread more easily, allows criminals to blend in to the community more easily, slows down transportation due to traffic, etc. High ...[text shortened]... likely to involve a "dog eat dog" view of the world since they have to compete for everything.
None of what you say is true about Japan or South Korea for instance.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
None of what you say is true about Japan or South Korea for instance.
South Korea has an incredible amount of traffic fatalities caused by aggressive driving in high traffic.

I'm curious - how do all these people manage to maintain spacious homes in high population areas? By definition high population density means less space per person.

Vote Up
Vote Down

e.g., these two:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/7427624.stm

Violent sons turned in by mother

----


chichester has a population of 23K, and doesn't appear particularly dense. area figures not provided on wikipedia, tho.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chichester

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_mot_veh_dea-health-motor-vehicle-deaths

Motor vehicle deaths (most recent) by country

Rank Countries Amount (top to bottom)
#1 United States: 15.5 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#2 Belgium: 15.4 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#3 New Zealand: 14 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#4 France: 13.7 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#5 Italy: 12.9 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#6 Ireland: 11.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#7 Austria: 10.4 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#8 Australia: 10 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#9 Germany: 9.8 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#10 Canada: 9.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#11 Denmark: 9.4 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#12 Japan: 8.8 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#13 Norway: 8.7 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#14 Switzerland: 8.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#15 Finland: 8.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#16 Netherlands: 7.2 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#17 Sweden: 5.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl
Weighted average: 10.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl

Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm also curious why people are claiming diseases don't spread easily in East Asia with all their influenza problems.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_mot_veh_dea-health-motor-vehicle-deaths

Motor vehicle deaths (most recent) by country

Rank Countries Amount (top to bottom)
#1 United States: 15.5 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#2 Belgium: 15.4 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#3 New Zealand: 14 deaths per 100,000 peopl
#4 France: 13.7 deaths p ...[text shortened]...
#17 Sweden: 5.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl
Weighted average: 10.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl
South Korea's not on that list.

TRAFFIC SAFETY AND ROAD CONDITIONS: The Republic of Korea’s roads are well paved, traffic lights are functional, and most drivers comply with basic traffic laws. However, Korea has a significantly higher traffic fatality rate than does the United States. Causes of accidents include excessive speed, frequent lane changes, running of red lights, aggressive bus drivers, and weaving motorcyclists. Pedestrians should be aware that motorcyclists sometimes drive on the sidewalks and drivers of all types of vehicles do not always yield to pedestrians in marked crosswalks. It is safer to use pedestrian underpasses and overpasses where available.

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1018.html#traffic_safety

Vote Up
Vote Down

that's a car density problem. maybe they play too many video games.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I'm also curious why people are claiming diseases don't spread easily in East Asia with all their influenza problems.
? who claims that?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
? who claims that?
"None of what you say is true about Japan or South Korea for instance."

-FMF

Vote Up
Vote Down

Getting back on topic, I have no problem with urban planning per se, but this top-down approach reeks of fascism.

Urban planning of private buildings (and their immersion in public spaces) should be done using adequate regulation, not by public construction and posterior allocation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

what if it's privately funded?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
what if it's privately funded?
We don't see this type of projects being privately funded and I doubt there's anything stopping them. The thing is that talking about urban planning is talking about the need to coordinate a densely populated geographical space owned by many different private individuals or corporations. These interact in many ways that do not go through the property market, so regulation is potentially very useful.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
? who claims that?
AThousandYoung doesn't want to talk to me directly probably because I called him a plonker the other day.

Tell him this for me, would you?

He said: Population density causes problems. More people means less street parking, smaller apartments, more conflict between people, more competition for everything. It makes disease spread more easily, allows criminals to blend in to the community more easily, slows down transportation due to traffic, etc. High population density encourages loud, obnoxious behavior because the squeakiest wheel gets the grease. Children raised in this kind of environment damage the quality of K-6 education by being loud and disruptive. Their cultural mores are more likely to involve a "dog eat dog" view of the world since they have to compete for everything."

So I said: "None of what you say is true about Japan or South Korea for instance."

You quite pertinently asked him: "why doesn't everyone who comes from HongKong act like that, then?

I personally had Tokyo and Seoul in mind as a contrast to Manilla, Jakarta, Bangkok etc. but my comment was more made in an effort to prevent the thread degenerating into Americans talking about American cities and American culture and extrapolating it onto the whole world, as is so often the way. It hadn't done that yet, admittedly. But that was the point of my point - not to put too fine a point on it.

Please tell AThousandYoung that that is what "people" meant.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
re incarceration, japan is #126 with 54 prisoners / 100K pop, US is at #1 with 715 prisoners / 100K pop, and HK is not in the list at nationmaster ...



http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_pri_per_cap-crime-prisoners-per-capita
Japan's changing it's laws in 2009 to allow jury trials because under the current law if the police accuse you, you're screwed. Prosecutions are rarely successfully challenged in Japan, and the law is changing because of human rights concerns.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
? ... not really .... 5 cops per thousand persons in HK doesn't really count as "massive" ... and Japan at #40 has 1.8 / thousand ...


http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_pol_percap-crime-police-per-capita

Showing latest available data. Rank Countries Amount (top to bottom)
#1 Montserrat: 7.81501 per 1,000 people
#2 Mauritius: ...[text shortened]... - 2000 (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Centre for International Crime Prevention)
That's the fifth highest in the world, zeeblebot.

Japan doesn't have so many police, but the police they do have have tremendous power with insufficient checks on them.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.