@no1marauder saidI know all about the denials. what do you expect them to do.
Luckily for you and MB, you're just two cranks on the web rather than a news network that can and did get sued for spreading such baseless lies:
"Months after his death, in May 2017, Fox News posted a story from one of its investigative reporters, Malia Zimmerman, that invoked unnamed law enforcement sources to claim that Seth Rich had been tied to the leak. The story ...[text shortened]... in on Seth Rich's death.[/b]"
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/15/1104511732/fox-news-seth-rich-murder
@Earl-of-Trumps saidI would expect decent human beings not to spread lies about a dead kid just for political purposes.
I know all about the denials. what do you expect them to do.
There isn't a single shred of evidence linking Rich to the hack and theft of the DNC emails and you know it.
@no1marauder saidyes, that is the way dems use lawfare to silence their opponents
Luckily for you and MB, you're just two cranks on the web rather than a news network that can and did get sued for spreading such baseless lies:
"Months after his death, in May 2017, Fox News posted a story from one of its investigative reporters, Malia Zimmerman, that invoked unnamed law enforcement sources to claim that Seth Rich had been tied to the leak. The story ...[text shortened]... in on Seth Rich's death.[/b]"
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/15/1104511732/fox-news-seth-rich-murder
@Wajoma
Luckily there are actual adults whose job it is to record history, you know, those folks called historians. THEY write it like it is with no political bias and they WILL tell it so our greatgrandkids can know the truth.
You on the otherhand are just a fringe monkey hooting on a thin branch with nobody listening.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThe idea that right wing BS is "silenced" in the US is beyond laughable.
yes, that is the way dems use lawfare to silence their opponents
To the extent that the legal process was successfully used by two parents to stop a giant media corporation from continuing to spread baseless, malicious lies about their dead son, I would give it a👍
@no1marauder saiddude, it's a theory, not a fact. get over it.
I would expect decent human beings not to spread lies about a dead kid just for political purposes.
There isn't a single shred of evidence linking Rich to the hack and theft of the DNC emails and you know it.
Ya know, the DC police listed Seth's death as a botched robbery, and you and I both know, that is bullspit
2 edits
@Earl-of-Trumps saidI know no such thing; it remains the most plausible explanation:
dude, it's a theory, not a fact. get over it.
Ya know, the DC police listed Seth's death as a botched robbery, and you and I both know, that is bullspit
"In 2016, there were 24 reported robberies with a gun that occurred within a quarter-mile of the street corner where Rich was shot."
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/24/15685560/seth-rich-conspiracy-theory-explained-fox-news-hannity
This incident happened a few blocks away from where I used to live; a student about Seth's age resisted during an armed robbery and was shot to death. https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/3-charged-killing-student-553914.php
Theories should have some facts supporting them and there aren't any supporting the Seth Rich stole the DNC emails one. And you know it.
@no1marauder saidThe Rich's protested what specifically? Even I would never accept every single conspiracy theory put forth by hundreds of people. They are just sick of being approached by all sorts of people asking them questions they cannot answer.
Luckily for you and MB, you're just two cranks on the web rather than a news network that can and did get sued for spreading such baseless lies:
"Months after his death, in May 2017, Fox News posted a story from one of its investigative reporters, Malia Zimmerman, that invoked unnamed law enforcement sources to claim that Seth Rich had been tied to the leak. The story ...[text shortened]... in on Seth Rich's death.[/b]"
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/15/1104511732/fox-news-seth-rich-murder
Your source is disinformation as well. It stated that Russia hacked the DNC and you know fully well Shawn Henry of Crowdstrike testified under oath they had "no evidence of exfiltration". And you have no motive for Seth Rich's assassination other than he leaked it to Assange and angered some powerful people. What was the motive? Tell us all. Who wanted him dead and why?
1 edit
@no1marauder saidHe was shot at least twice in the back. That is not consistent with a robbery and no money was taken from his wallet. If it was a robbery his money would have been taken.
I know no such thing; it remains the most plausible explanation:
"In 2016, there were 24 reported robberies with a gun that occurred within a quarter-mile of the street corner where Rich was shot."
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/24/15685560/seth-rich-conspiracy-theory-explained-fox-news-hannity
This incident happened a few blocks away from where I ...[text shortened]... orting them and there aren't any supporting the Seth Rich stole the DNC emails one. And you know it.
Robberies gone wrong typically result in the victim being shot in the front. Nobody shoots the victim in the back unless they want their money badly. No money was stolen from him.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/report-dnc-staffer-seth-rich-likely-targeted-by-experienced-killer-not-random-robbery/
@Metal-Brain saidActually the facts are strongly supportive of the botched robbery theory rather than a professional hit presumably by some of the vast cadre of assassins the DNC surely employs.
He was shot at least twice in the back. That is not consistent with a robbery and no money was taken from his wallet. If it was a robbery his money would have been taken.
Robberies gone wrong typically result in the victim being shot in the front. Nobody shoots the victim in the back unless they want their money badly. No money was stolen from him.
https://lawandcrim ...[text shortened]... /high-profile/report-dnc-staffer-seth-rich-likely-targeted-by-experienced-killer-not-random-robbery/
Pros would shoot a victim in the head twice, not in the back, which left Seth alive and conscious and able to speak with police and EMTs when they arrived.
On the other hands, the signs of a physical struggle between Seth and his attackers followed by the two shots in his back suggest he broke away and ran before being shot in his back. His killer(s) may not have wanted to linger at a murder scene, with shots fired in a residential area, long enough to rifle his pockets risking prompt arrival of police.
Couple all that with the fact their remains not one shred of evidence linking Seth to the DNC leak and his tragic killing in a high crime area overwhelmingly likely to have been a street crime not part of a baseless, crank conspiracy theory.
@no1marauder said" the signs of a physical struggle between Seth and his attackers followed by the two shots in his back suggest he broke away and ran before being shot in his back."
Actually the facts are strongly supportive of the botched robbery theory rather than a professional hit presumably by some of the vast cadre of assassins the DNC surely employs.
Pros would shoot a victim in the head twice, not in the back, which left Seth alive and conscious and able to speak with police and EMTs when they arrived.
On the other hands, the signs of a ...[text shortened]... a overwhelmingly likely to have been a street crime not part of a baseless, crank conspiracy theory.
That is BS. There were no signs of a struggle and no money was stolen from him. A robber would only shoot him in the back if he wanted to steal money from him. No money was stolen.
Why would Hillary or her cohorts make it look like an obvious assassination?
Robberies that leave the money make about as much sense as the FBI asking to keep Seth Rich's computer top secret for 66 years. No cover up here. LOL
https://ground.news/article/fbi-fighting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidYou're lying or misinformed; there were signs of a physical struggle and the police quickly came to the conclusion that it was a botched robbery (look up the word "botched" as you seem to think all perpetrators of street crimes act in a perfectly logical and rational manner) where the killers panicked after the shooting and quickly fled the scene. https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/24/us/seth-rich-dnc-wikileaks-theories/index.html
" the signs of a physical struggle between Seth and his attackers followed by the two shots in his back suggest he broke away and ran before being shot in his back."
That is BS. There were no signs of a struggle and no money was stolen from him. A robber would only shoot him in the back if he wanted to steal money from him. No money was stolen.
Why would Hillary or ...[text shortened]... hting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
That is exactly what happened in the other crime I linked to which happened in my old neighborhood.