1 edit
@no1marauder saidRobberies that leave the money make about as much sense as the FBI asking to keep Seth Rich's computer top secret for 66 years. No cover up here. LOL
You're lying or misinformed; there were signs of a physical struggle and the police quickly came to the conclusion that it was a botched robbery (look up the word "botched" as you seem to think all perpetrators of street crimes act in a perfectly logical and rational manner) where the killers panicked after the shooting and quickly fled the scene. https://www.cnn.com/2017 ...[text shortened]...
That is exactly what happened in the other crime I linked to which happened in my old neighborhood.
https://ground.news/article/fbi-fighting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
Why such a big secret if it was merely a botched robbery?
From the link below:
"The Profiling Project, an independent, nonpartisan group of forensic psychology graduate students at George Washington University, released a study on Tuesday analyzing the circumstances surrounding the death of Seth Rich.
“We do not believe Offender is a robber, nor a robber who killed,” the report says. For one, the report mentions that Rich’s watch, wallet, phone, and necklace were not stolen. Additionally, it notes that Rich was shot in the back and there were no signs of a physical struggle. Therefore, it says that Rich’s death does not look like a robbery gone bad."
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/report-dnc-staffer-seth-rich-likely-targeted-by-experienced-killer-not-random-robbery/
@Metal-Brain saidYou really want to rely on that article? OK:
Robberies that leave the money make about as much sense as the FBI asking to keep Seth Rich's computer top secret for 66 years. No cover up here. LOL
https://ground.news/article/fbi-fighting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
Why such a big secret if it was merely a botched robbery?
From the link below:
...[text shortened]... /high-profile/report-dnc-staffer-seth-rich-likely-targeted-by-experienced-killer-not-random-robbery/
"However, it also debunks conspiracy theories surrounding Rich’s death, like the controversial belief that Rich was murdered for supposedly leaking information to Wikileaks. The report examined theories of Rich being killed as a result of a planned effort by the DNC, the Clintons, Russian operatives, or some other “hit team.”
The Profiling Project ultimately said that none of these theories are likely. If Rich was taken out by the DNC, the Clintons, Russians, or any other organized effort, the report argues, they would have used a professional, who would have made sure Rich was dead. Rich didn’t die until after he was transported to a hospital. “A professional killer, whose sole job would have been to terminate Seth,” the report says, “did not accomplish their mission prior to escaping.”"
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/report-dnc-staffer-seth-rich-likely-targeted-by-experienced-killer-not-random-robbery/
The article does have one bit of incorrect information; it claims: " Additionally, it notes that Rich was shot in the back and there were no signs of a physical struggle."
But that's wrong; there was bruising on Seth's hand and face and his watchband was broken: "There were signs of a struggle. Seth's hands and face showed bruising. " https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-43727858
So their conclusion it wasn't a botched robbery is based on incorrect information and their other conclusions debunk your crank conspiracy theory.
@no1marauder saidSeth Rich's computer top secret for 66 years. No cover up here.
You really want to rely on that article? OK:
"However, it also debunks conspiracy theories surrounding Rich’s death, like the controversial belief that Rich was murdered for supposedly leaking information to Wikileaks. The report examined theories of Rich being killed as a result of a planned effort by the DNC, the Clintons, Russian operatives, or some other “hit team. ...[text shortened]... y is based on incorrect information and their other conclusions debunk your crank conspiracy theory.
https://ground.news/article/fbi-fighting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
@Metal-Brain saidWhy don't you post every single bit of evidence that Seth Rich had anything to do with the emails stolen from the DNC?
Seth Rich's computer top secret for 66 years. No cover up here.
https://ground.news/article/fbi-fighting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
It would take all of us far to long to quote all the evidence showing the Russians did though one can peruse the relevant portions of the Mueller Report which give specific dates and times of the hacks as well as when they were sent to Wikileaks, including the actual name of the file sent.
@no1marauder saidThere is no evidence the emails were exfiltrated. We have been over this so many times. You refuse to be confused with facts. Shawn Henry under oath. Why didn't he go to jail for perjury if he lied? He didn't!
Why don't you post every single bit of evidence that Seth Rich had anything to do with the emails stolen from the DNC?
It would take all of us far to long to quote all the evidence showing the Russians did though one can peruse the relevant portions of the Mueller Report which give specific dates and times of the hacks as well as when they were sent to Wikileaks, including the actual name of the file sent.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidWhy don't you call for the FBI to release Seth Rich's computer information so you can prove there is nothing to find on it? What is the bloody secret? You said it was a robbery, so why keep a computer unrelated to a botched robbery secret?
Why don't you post every single bit of evidence that Seth Rich had anything to do with the emails stolen from the DNC?
It would take all of us far to long to quote all the evidence showing the Russians did though one can peruse the relevant portions of the Mueller Report which give specific dates and times of the hacks as well as when they were sent to Wikileaks, including the actual name of the file sent.
What could possibly be so important?
@Metal-Brain said"HENRY: We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government. And our analysts that looked at it and that had looked at these types of attacks before, many different types of attacks similar to this in different environments, certain tools that were used, certain methods by which they were moving in the environment, and looking at the types of data that was being targeted, that it was consistent with a nation-state adversary and associated with Russian intelligence. "
There is no evidence the emails were exfiltrated. We have been over this so many times. You refuse to be confused with facts. Shawn Henry under oath. Why didn't he go to jail for perjury if he lied? He didn't!
https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/
@Metal-Brain saidSeth Rich was the innocent victim of a vicious crime. Since there is zero evidence to suggest he did anything wrong, I see no reason his personal and private files should be made available for public perusal.
Why don't you call for the FBI to release Seth Rich's computer information so you can prove there is nothing to find on it? What is the bloody secret? You said it was a robbery, so why keep a computer unrelated to a botched robbery secret?
What could possibly be so important?
But the case is currently proceeding in Federal Court and whatever decision is ultimately made is acceptable to me.
@no1marauder saidIf there is zero evidence to suggest he did anything wrong all the more reason his personal and private files should be made available. Nothing to hide.
Seth Rich was the innocent victim of a vicious crime. Since there is zero evidence to suggest he did anything wrong, I see no reason his personal and private files should be made available for public perusal.
But the case is currently proceeding in Federal Court and whatever decision is ultimately made is acceptable to me.
Why do you think the FBI wants it top secret for 66 years? Because there is nothing there? That is ridiculous. And why did Assange offer a reward to find Seth's killer and deny the DNC emails came from the Russians and implied it was Seth Rich who leaked the DNC emails?
2 edits
@Metal-Brain saidJust being murdered shouldn't end your right to not have personal and private materials you never intended to be revealed made public.
If there is zero evidence to suggest he did anything wrong all the more reason his personal and private files should be made available. Nothing to hide.
Why do you think the FBI wants it top secret for 66 years? Because there is nothing there? That is ridiculous. And why did Assange offer a reward to find Seth's killer and deny the DNC emails came from the Russians and implied it was Seth Rich who leaked the DNC emails?
Maybe YOU should publish every thing on your PC and phone for public view UNLESS have "nothing to hide".
Assange was being a scumbag to hide the fact Wikileaks got the stolen emails from the Russian military. Doing so, tainted all his previous good work in revealing US war crimes in Afghanistan, Iraq and other laudable revelations. His hatred for HRC made him wander into partisan politics as a pawn of Putin, which is regrettable enough but his disinformation attempts about a dead kid were really scummy (though he never said that Rich provided Wikileaks with anything).
Still not one shred of actual evidence showing Seth Rich had anything to do with the theft of the DNC emails though. No surprise; like I said being a petty internet dirtbag allows you considerably more freedom to lie about someone then Fox News was allowed when they got successfully sued for the same lies you are still spreading.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidYour repeating that baseless conspiracy theory that Assange lied about Russia not being his source is pathetic. Every time democrats that are in bed with the elites get exposed as liars they come up with another conspiracy theory calling every damning fact a lie. Your reckless pandering of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that everything that absolves Russia is a lie is pathetic.
Just being murdered shouldn't end your right to not have personal and private materials you never intended to be revealed made public.
Maybe YOU should publish every thing on your PC and phone for public view UNLESS have "nothing to hide".
Assange was being a scumbag to hide the fact Wikileaks got the stolen emails from the Russian military. Doing so, tainted all h ...[text shortened]... then Fox News was allowed when they got successfully sued for the same lies you are still spreading.
You and your ignorant democrat friends only believe that pathetic garbage is because you want to. Whenever Hillary calls someone a Russian asset you accept that crap without question. And when are you going to admit whoever exposed DWS for election meddling and led to her resigning the DNC in disgrace actually did this country a great service?
Is it still your absurd belief that exposing election meddling is election meddling?
In what insane universe does that make any sense at all? If you honestly think Shawn Henry committed perjury and it was Russia that hacked the DNC why are not grateful to Russia for it?
You want the election meddler protected. You want to protect Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Admit it. You hate Russia for exposing her effort to rig the democrat primary against Sanders. Admit it.
@no1marauder said"Just being murdered shouldn't end your right to not have personal and private materials you never intended to be revealed made public."
Just being murdered shouldn't end your right to not have personal and private materials you never intended to be revealed made public.
Maybe YOU should publish every thing on your PC and phone for public view UNLESS have "nothing to hide".
Assange was being a scumbag to hide the fact Wikileaks got the stolen emails from the Russian military. Doing so, tainted all h ...[text shortened]... then Fox News was allowed when they got successfully sued for the same lies you are still spreading.
Then why did a judge order the FBI to release that information?
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/judge-orders-fbi-turn-over-information-laptop-murdered-democratic-staffer
@Metal-Brain saidBy now, even someone as stupid as you knows the evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC emails and then released them to Wikileaks is overwhelming.
Your repeating that baseless conspiracy theory that Assange lied about Russia not being his source is pathetic. Every time democrats that are in bed with the elites get exposed as liars they come up with another conspiracy theory calling every damning fact a lie. Your reckless pandering of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that everything that absolves Russia is a lie ...[text shortened]... t it. You hate Russia for exposing her effort to rig the democrat primary against Sanders. Admit it.
We've covered your other bits of stupidity on this Forum enough to not waste further time on. Your absurd take that a foreign military stealing materials from a US political party to aid another candidate is no more election meddling than members of that party favoring one candidate over another is one of the most moronic claims ever made on this board (and that's saying something). Needless to say, Federal law sees the two things quite differently.
@Metal-Brain saidThe case is still in litigation and no final order has been made. It's called Huddleston v. FBI; Google it.
"Just being murdered shouldn't end your right to not have personal and private materials you never intended to be revealed made public."
Then why did a judge order the FBI to release that information?
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/judge-orders-fbi-turn-over-information-laptop-murdered-democratic-staffer
1 edit
And even the majority Republican Senate Intelligence Committee found that the Russians were the ones who stole the DNC emails as part of their illegal campaign to interfere in the US election and that Wikileaks was a knowing participant in that scheme.https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/press/[WORD TOO LONG].
EDIT: Damn it, try: https://rollcall.com/2020/08/18/senate-intelligence-committee-russian-interference-2016-election-report/