The American intelligence community proved that Russia hacked the DNC is the democrat's big lie. This is what they said:
We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data
High confidence is not proof. For example, I have high confidence no1 marauder is not a lawyer, but I do not have proof. I only have circumstantial evidence which is not proof. Circumstantial evidence is not evidence, it is a misnomer.
This next excerpt from the ICA is is such obvious propaganda it is hilarious:
"This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified
assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.
12
Formal Disassociation From Kremlin Facilitates RT US Messaging
RT America formally disassociates itself from the Russian Government by using a Moscow-based
autonomous nonprofit organization to finance its US operations. According to RT's leadership, this
structure was set up to avoid the Foreign Agents Registration Act and to facilitate licensing abroad. In
addition, RT rebranded itself in 2008 to deemphasize its Russian origin"
RT rebranded itself in 2008 to deemphasize its Russian origin even though it is still called Russia Today? LOL! So stupid!
@Metal-Brain saidUhuh.
The American intelligence community proved that Russia hacked the DNC is the democrat's big lie. This is what they said:
We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data
High confidence is not proof. For example, I have high c ...[text shortened]... 2008 to deemphasize its Russian origin even though it is still called Russia Today? LOL! So stupid!
Do you know anything about intelligence gathering, risk analysis and diplomacy?
I thought not.
And that’s why you draw absurd conclusions.
Do you know anything about the law, case law and jurisprudence?
I thought not.
And that’s why you don’t comprehend that Marauder has to be, at least to some extent, trained on these matters.
Basically, you read information, and instead of checking it or looking at it from various angles, you take it, run down a rabbit hole and end up spewing forth nonsense.
On nearly every topic you broach. It’s truly remarkable.
@shavixmir saidHigh confidence is not proof.
Uhuh.
Do you know anything about intelligence gathering, risk analysis and diplomacy?
I thought not.
And that’s why you draw absurd conclusions.
Do you know anything about the law, case law and jurisprudence?
I thought not.
And that’s why you don’t comprehend that Marauder has to be, at least to some extent, trained on these matters.
Basically, you read in ...[text shortened]... hole and end up spewing forth nonsense.
On nearly every topic you broach. It’s truly remarkable.
@Metal-Brain saidYou're trying far too hard for your Kremlin bosses.
The American intelligence community proved that Russia hacked the DNC is the democrat's big lie. This is what they said:
We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data
High confidence is not proof. For example, I have high c ...[text shortened]... 2008 to deemphasize its Russian origin even though it is still called Russia Today? LOL! So stupid!
People with a brain (this leaves out Republicans) know better.
@BOBDANIEL09 saidYou do you.
Biological proof is not proof to you
As unintelligible as ever.
Not sure what this has to do with Russia.
@Earl-of-Trumps saidIt was a low tech phishing link. Someone at the DNC took the bait, and that's how the hacker got in. No one at the RNC was stupid enough to click on suspicious links, so they did not get hacked.
both the DNC and the TNC were attacked by the Russian hackers. But I believe someone *else*
was the culprit in the case of the DNC email server having data stolen.
It was an inside job. for sure.
Democrats then blamed the Republicans for what turned out to be their own carelessness and lack of due diligence.
Go figure.
@Metal-Brain saidNo. No it is not.
High confidence is not proof.
And there is never 100% proof (unless we’re talking alcohol).
Everything is a sliding scale of likelyhood.
You will not find smoking guns. What you find, in reality, is that if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck, that it will be deemed highly likley that it’s not a bloody automobile. And that, with high confidence, it will be advised that building a garage is not the solution to the problem.
And that, my fuzzy little friend, is how many matters in government and advisory roles work. And the intellegince services are, to a great extent, an advisory organisation.
Let me advise you: stop with the binary thinking. The world is not black & white. It’s all just shades of grey. Yes, that does mean that absolute opinions are based in naievity and ignorance.
All absolutisms are simplistic representations of the truth: they make matters easier to comprehend, but they are not as factual as you are led to believe.
@shavixmir said"And there is never 100% proof"
No. No it is not.
And there is never 100% proof (unless we’re talking alcohol).
Everything is a sliding scale of likelyhood.
You will not find smoking guns. What you find, in reality, is that if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck, that it will be deemed highly likley that it’s not a bloody automobile. And that, with high confidence, it wil ...[text shortened]... ruth: they make matters easier to comprehend, but they are not as factual as you are led to believe.
The democrats falsely claimed there was. That is the big lie.
It is just as likely that Seth Rich did an inside job.
https://ground.news/article/fbi-fighting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
@Earl-of-Trumps saidYes, it was an inside job.
both the DNC and the TNC were attacked by the Russian hackers. But I believe someone *else*
was the culprit in the case of the DNC email server having data stolen.
It was an inside job. for sure.
https://ground.news/article/fbi-fighting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
Nothing was stolen from Seth Rich so it was not a robbery. He was assassinated and the FBI is trying to cover it up like they did Hunter's laptop.
@Metal-Brain saidYeah, like that’s got anything to do with what I just wrote.
"And there is never 100% proof"
The democrats falsely claimed there was. That is the big lie.
It is just as likely that Seth Rich did an inside job.
https://ground.news/article/fbi-fighting-court-order-wants-66-years-to-reveal-information-from-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-richs-computer
🙄