Go back
The Matrix

The Matrix

Debates

Brother Edwin
7 edits

The moral highground

Joined
06 May 04
Moves
34658
Clock
14 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Who wants to duscuss the philosophy of this triliogy.

h

Cosmos

Joined
21 Jan 04
Moves
11184
Clock
15 Oct 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

It has no coherent philosophy.

It contradicts itself at every twist and turn. The whole series is simply * dressed up with stunning special effects.

Ravello
The Rude©

who knows?

Joined
30 Dec 03
Moves
176648
Clock
15 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

go watch ''Pretty woman''

Nemesio
Ursulakantor

Pittsburgh, PA

Joined
05 Mar 02
Moves
34824
Clock
15 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
It has no coherent philosophy. It contradicts itself at every twist and turn.
Would you care to give an example or two rather than making a dismissive, axiomatic statement such as this?

Nemesio

h

Cosmos

Joined
21 Jan 04
Moves
11184
Clock
15 Oct 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by nemesio
Would you care to give an example or two rather than making a dismissive, axiomatic statement such as this?

Nemesio
What's the point? It's all *.

It would be easier to give some coherent philosophy in the film:

...

Did you get that?

Brother Edwin
7 edits

The moral highground

Joined
06 May 04
Moves
34658
Clock
15 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
What's the point? It's all bollocks.

It would be easier to give some coherent philosophy in the film:

...

Did you get that?
Is this your well-reasond opinuion, or the moronic bablings of a preteen in total cognative surrender?

l

Milton Keynes, UK

Joined
28 Jul 04
Moves
81605
Clock
15 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
What's the point? It's all bollocks.

It would be easier to give some coherent philosophy in the film:

...

Did you get that?

Although you could be very much correct. It would be better if you do give some examples. I personally believe that the concept of the film is nothing new. Authors like Philip K Dick wrote stories which talked about alternative realities like this back in the 60s.

Lau

s

ruislipwoods

Joined
02 May 03
Moves
28830
Clock
15 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

First film Great.

Ohh that made us a lot of money lets do it again and again.
That way we make even more money.

So the philosphy is Make money by calling it a triliogy.

David Tebb

Joined
26 May 02
Moves
72546
Clock
15 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by seanpbutler
First film Great.

Ohh that made us a lot of money lets do it again and again.
That way we make even more money.

So the philosphy is Make money by calling it a triliogy.
I agree with what you're saying. But the studios only make these sequels because the movie-going public asks for them. I was (still am) a fan of the original Matrix film and I loved it so much, that I practically demanded they made a sequel! Of course when the sequels arrived, they weren't as good. But why were we surprised?

-Dave

d

Joined
05 Jan 04
Moves
45179
Clock
15 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by David Tebb
I agree with what you're saying. But the studios only make these sequels because the movie-going public asks for them. I was (still am) a fan of the original Matrix film and I loved it so much, that I practically demanded they made a sequel! Of course when the sequels arrived, they weren't as good. But why were we surprised?

-Dave
Another example of this: Star Wars Episodes 1 and 2. Total trash.

j
Top Gun

Angels 20

Joined
27 Aug 03
Moves
10670
Clock
15 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
Another example of this: Star Wars Episodes 1 and 2. Total trash.
But they look so pretty! 😛

s
Red Republican

Auckland

Joined
08 Jun 03
Moves
6680
Clock
16 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Brother Edwin
Who wants to duscuss the philosophy of this triliogy.
I did not know pretentiousness was now classed as a philosophy.

Brother Edwin
7 edits

The moral highground

Joined
06 May 04
Moves
34658
Clock
16 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steerpike
I did not know pretentiousness was now classed as a philosophy.
I know theres loadsa philosophy in it but I just cant really explain it. Somethng abot the robots and the people...

PG
Disavowed

Seattle, WA

Joined
07 Jan 02
Moves
20517
Clock
16 Oct 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Has anyone read this? I will say that I liked all three movies and I did get some of the references (mostly due to my ludicrous course of study in college), but this article is quite in-depth and expounds on points that I was only vaguely familiar with. It's a very interesting read, but set aside some time as it's quite long.

http://whatisthematrix.warnerbros.com/rl_cmp/new_phil_wakeup.html

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
16 Oct 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Poison Godmachine
Has anyone read this? I will say that I liked all three movies and I did get some of the references (mostly due to my ludicrous course of study in college), but this article is quite in-depth and expounds on points that I was only ...[text shortened]...
http://whatisthematrix.warnerbros.com/rl_cmp/new_phil_wakeup.html
I've read part of the article and I didn't see the movie. I don't want to see such a load of non-sense and pseudo-religious or pseudo-philosophical blah blah.
It seems to me this is a way of satisfying people's hunger for "explanations" and "spirituality" by offering them spiritual junk food. It tastes sóóóó good and after you've finished you want more .... and more ... and more

.............. indeed, "wake up" and stop waisting your money and energy on this spiritual junk food.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.