1. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    04 Jul '10 20:511 edit
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    Rugby players got to be tough to play without pads.
    Take a look at how Rugby League is played in Australia. Now THAT is rough game.

    The "best" version of football I reckon is Australian Rules Football. For natural uninhibited running, tackling, catching, kicking - it is a great game. No 'off-side'. No problem using the hands. No limits on kicking. etc. etc. And it's limited to Australia by historical accident. If we could rewind football history 150 years and introduce the Australian code to the world rather than the Association code, I reckon it would be played the world over by millions upon millions of people.
  2. Joined
    22 Jun '08
    Moves
    8801
    04 Jul '10 23:28
    Bull Riding,, hands down. Rugby,,,phooeyyy babies game.
  3. Joined
    22 Jun '08
    Moves
    8801
    04 Jul '10 23:30
    Originally posted by FMF
    I never broke a bone in 19 years of rugby.
    So, it took a cycle wreck to crack your first bone...
  4. Joined
    22 Jun '08
    Moves
    8801
    04 Jul '10 23:31
    Originally posted by FMF
    Three downs and 15 yards ... so what, they throw it a lot of the time? But how does that work with a narrower pitch? I managed a Canadian pro side for a while but I never fully figured out what to do.
    Pick up a Warren Moon for QB?
  5. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    05 Jul '10 16:30
    Originally posted by FMF
    It's an off the shelf cliched "joke" that a lot of humorless Brits use. Australians who also play rugby, have no time for it, I noted when I lived there. Then again, the Aussies can hold their heads pretty high in almost all football codes. The Brits - of course - have an inferiority complex in most sporst most of the time. Hence the revealing array of lame and ...[text shortened]... ng third-hand pub-bore-esque "digs" at other people's sports and other nations in general.
    .. I noted when I lived there...

    Impressive, it really seems like you have traveled the whole world.
    just out of curiosity, was this after or before you got your degree in US constitutional law and started selling cosmetics in indonesia?
  6. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    05 Jul '10 16:541 edit
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    of course you did. and you also sell cosmetics and is an specialist in US constitutional law, not to mention you also "traveled the world". Is there anything you haven't done?
    I see.
  7. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    05 Jul '10 16:551 edit
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    Impressive, it really seems like you have traveled the whole world.
    just out of curiosity, was this after or before you got your degree in US constitutional law and started selling cosmetics in indonesia?
    Right, uh huh.
  8. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    05 Jul '10 16:58
    Originally posted by FMF
    Right, uh huh.
    you seem to have a certain difficulty in answering questions straight, why would that be?
  9. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    05 Jul '10 17:03
    Originally posted by generalissimo
    you seem to have a certain difficulty in answering questions straight, why would that be?
    And what question would that be, out of curiosity?
  10. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    05 Jul '10 17:04
    Originally posted by FMF
    And what question would that be, out of curiosity?
    non sequitur.
  11. Joined
    27 Dec '05
    Moves
    143878
    05 Jul '10 17:14
    Originally posted by FMF
    What an embarrassment the blinkered snig gering of some parochial home-based fellow Brits is to those of us who have carved for ourselves a Renaissance Man life out here, autonomous upon the leading edge, looked up to for the irresistible applicability of our Britishness, imitated and analyzed, doted on and quoted on, as we walk the walk in this whopping wide wonderful walk-the-walker's world.
    😴😴😴😴😴
  12. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    05 Jul '10 17:23
    Originally posted by zeeblebot
    Football: Injury rate per 1000 hours: 35.3. Your legs cop 77% of injuries, with 21% to the knee and 18% to the ankle.
    Rugby: Injury rate per 1000 hours: 69. Officially the world's most dangerous team sport, with an average of 1.4 "serious" injuries per match (a quarter of them being to the head).
    When I coached youth soccer and rugby the contrasts were very interesting. The rugby season was September to December followed by the soccer season from January to April. The youngsters playing these two codes were basically the same bunch and yet the ethos of the two seasons could hardly have been more contrasting - including the behaviour of the parents on the touchlines.

    The rugby union season was 'diginified', sportsmanlike, disciplined, group-effort oriented, no backchat to the refs whatsoever.

    Then after the Christmas break - the same kids, like I said - there was trash talk, egos rampant, 'simulations' left right and centre, the ref copping constant lip, parents urging murder from the touchline as their teenagers ran around playing Asssociation football.

    As for injuries, when they did occur, cuts and bruises to knees and shins in soccer, whereas in rugby it was bloody noses and the occasional concussion.
  13. Standard memberDrKF
    incipit parodia
    Joined
    01 Aug '07
    Moves
    46580
    05 Jul '10 17:34
    Originally posted by FMF
    When I coached youth soccer and rugby the contrasts were very interesting. The rugby season was September to December followed by the soccer season from January to April. The youngsters playing these two codes were basically the same bunch and yet the ethos of the two seasons could hardly have been more contrasting - including the behaviour of the parents on the ...[text shortened]... ees and shins in soccer, whereas in rugby it was bloody noses and the occasional concussion.
    It's still much the same: the last rugby match I attended, I was able to drink a beer I bought at the bar in the stands; the last football match I attended, my bag was searched for any alcohol, and I saw people being turned away for being too drunk.

    To be totally honest, it's the class distinctions between the crowds that stand out most...
  14. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    05 Jul '10 17:44
    Originally posted by DrKF
    It's still much the same: the last rugby match I attended, I was able to drink a beer I bought at the bar in the stands; the last football match I attended, my bag was searched for any alcohol, and I saw people being turned away for being too drunk.

    To be totally honest, it's the class distinctions between the crowds that stand out most...
    The changing room air was thick with vanity in the soccer season. The same can be said for the basketball team. Cricket had a similar ethos to rugby although the tantrums and post finger stump fellings of Broad and Gatting in the late 80s were immediately mimicked by youngsters I noticed. Cricket had the virtue of being a true stand and deliver sport and therefore fertile only for the talented egos that were able to produce. You get wickets or you don't. You tonk a few runs or you don't. You can hold your catches or you can't. For the most part the blame for failure on the cricket field is easily dished out. A cocky soccer player can run around the park doing little or nothing all morning, give it a bit of leary double teapot when the going gets rough, and blame other kids all week until the next Saturday comes around.
  15. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    07 Jul '10 12:571 edit
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    Take the pads off football players then compare injuries.

    Rugby players got to be tough to play without pads.

    Football players would have to be bats*** insane to play without pads.
    Without pads and helmets, football wouldn't be football. In the NFL, you have 300 pound monsters in great shape coming at you at 17 MPH trying to kill you. There's a reason why NFL QBs, a position that has little to do with physical strength, are still usually well over 6' tall and well over 200 lbs. The shorter and lighter ones get maimed by the monsters on the defensive line. The big ones have a tough enough time staying healthy.

    Ask a rugby player to go over the middle to catch a pass on front of Ronnie Lott or Steve Atwater once and see if they don't think pads and a helmet are a good idea.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree