@earl-of-trumps saidAre property and resources owned by the NK public? No, therefore not communist.
there is no way I will ever debate a lying spambot.
but if you think you won a debate because your lips moved up and down and said North Korea is NOT communist then you are a bigger fool than I thought.
I don't think you actually believe that. I think you are just looking for the chicken chit way out
BWAAAAAAKK
Is the Kim regime fascist? Yes, therefore right-wing.
All it takes to beat you in a debate is a dictionary.
3 edits
All communist countries end up fascist.
Name a communist country that accepted people who weren't the race of that country and it was a successful communist country?
You can't.
All far left countries look after their own.
Cuba looked after Cubans.
Russia looked after Russians.
China looks after the Chinese.
See what I mean?
If the USA keeps trying for Communism you may get it and have legions of white troops marching.
Be careful what you wish for.
@cheesemaster saidWhat you're missing is that there has never been a communist country. No nation has ever actually shared resources as one with the public. Governments have claimed to be communist, but none ever truly were.
All communist countries end up fascist.
Name a communist country that accepted people who weren't the race of that country and it was a successful communist country?
You can't.
All far left countries look after their own.
Cuba looked after Cubans.
Russia looked after Russians.
China looks after the Chinese.
See what I mean?
If the USA keeps trying for ...[text shortened]... Communism you may get it and have legions of white troops marching.
Be careful what you wish for.
As such, we've never actually had an example of a communist to judge as a success or not.
@vivify saidI told you, I am not debating a lying spambot.
Are property and resources owned by the NK public? No, therefore not communist.
Is the Kim regime fascist? Yes, therefore right-wing.
All it takes to beat you in a debate is a dictionary.
The DPRK was indeed envisioned to become a Marxist-Leninist state within the realm of Soviet influence. Following the division of the Korean peninsula, North of the 38th parallel Stalin oversaw the creation of a typical USSR inspired regime with all the government organs of a typical communist structure. This included the establishment of a party state-system (the Worker’s Party of Korea), with all dimensions of power being centralized into a strict top-down hierarchy led by the Politburo and complete state control of the economy. Kim Il Sung, a former Soviet army captain, was christened to be its leader. In this form the DPRK would be officially proclaimed in September 1948,its initial ideology thus being Stalinism-Marxism-Leninism.
--------------------
https://www.visitthedprk.org/is-north-korea-communist/
now cut the crap and stop making things up.
Yes the people own everything in theory.
@vivify saidpile of doo doo
What you're missing is that there has never been a communist country. No nation has ever actually shared resources as one with the public. Governments have claimed to be communist, but none ever truly were.
As such, we've never actually had an example of a communist to judge as a success or not.
@earl-of-trumps saidWhat was envisioned way back in the 1940's doesn't reflect what NK is today: a fascist state.
I told you, I am not debating a lying spambot.
[i]The DPRK was indeed envisioned to become a Marxist-Leninist state within the realm of Soviet influence. Following the division of the Korean peninsula, North of the 38th parallel Stalin oversaw the creation of a typical USSR inspired regime with all the government organs of a typical communist structure. This include ...[text shortened]... /
now cut the crap and stop making things up.
Yes the people own everything in theory.
That was easy.
@earl-of-trumps saidYou were very easy to refute.
Vivify, we are DONE. for good.
I have found you to be a disingenuous spammer and a troll.
bye bye
Ta-ta.
@earl-of-trumps said"with all dimensions of power being centralized into a strict top-down hierarchy"
I told you, I am not debating a lying spambot.
[i]The DPRK was indeed envisioned to become a Marxist-Leninist state within the realm of Soviet influence. Following the division of the Korean peninsula, North of the 38th parallel Stalin oversaw the creation of a typical USSR inspired regime with all the government organs of a typical communist structure. This include ...[text shortened]... /
now cut the crap and stop making things up.
Yes the people own everything in theory.
Vivify's got a point. The workers definitely aren't on top.
1 edit
@Duchess64 - The DPRK does NOT even profess to be specifically Communist (i.e. Marxist-Leninist).
If you want to lie there is nothing I can do about it.. I just posted a link with this:
In this form the DPRK would be officially proclaimed in September 1948,its initial ideology thus being Stalinism-Marxism-Leninism.
-------------------
And you ignore it. So does vivify. Ya, don't let the facts get in the way of truth.,
"North Korea is not communist",,, - what a friggin hoot.
North Korea's government is totalitarian with the government owning all businesses. CLOSE ENOUGH TO COMMUNISM