Originally posted by vivifyIt's a real puzzle to me why Trumpites think that dragging Bill Clinton front and center into the campaign will help Trump. Unlike either Hillary or Trump, Bill retains a positive favorable rating; one would think it would be common sense to go after someone unpopular i.e. Hillary rather than someone popular i.e. Bill esp. since the unpopular one is the one you are running against. Re-litigating the 1990s is unlikely to aid Trump.
Did Trump really say that? That's a great burn if he did.
EDIT: http://www.pollingreport.com/clinton1.htm
Though Bill's numbers have dipped a bit this year, he still retains a favorable rating of at least +10%.
Originally posted by no1marauderYou're missing the point. The idea behind having Gennifer Flowers sit in the front row would be to rattle Hillary, not Bill.
It's a real puzzle to me why Trumpites think that dragging Bill Clinton front and center into the campaign will help Trump. Unlike either Hillary or Trump, Bill retains a positive favorable rating; one would think it would be common sense to go after someone unpopular i.e. Hillary rather than someone popular i.e. Bill esp. since the unpopular one is the ...[text shortened]... ill's numbers have dipped a bit this year, he still retains a favorable rating of at least +10%.
Anyone with half a brain knows if Trump suggested this it's obviously a joke and in response to what the Dems have in mind, but I seriously doubt having Cuban sitting in the front row will throw Trump off his game.
25 Sep 16
Originally posted by lemon limeI want to hear from the 2 candidates, their DETAILED plans for fixing our 2nd rate education system, our crumbling infrastructure, and caring for our homeless vet's. But, I suppose this melodrama with Jennifer flowers and Cuban etc. is more important to many than any substantive issues. 😞
You're missing the point. The idea behind having Gennifer Flowers sit in the front row would be to rattle Hillary, not Bill.
Anyone with half a brain knows if Trump suggested this it's obviously a joke and in response to what the Dems have in mind, but I seriously doubt having Cuban sitting in the front row will throw Trump off his game.
25 Sep 16
Originally posted by lemon limeThe sad part is, people will only tune in to watch their candidate bury the other, which should not be too hard for either.
Because you don't like either one of them. But don't feel bad, I wasn't invited either.
All that we can know for certain is, whether Trump or Hillary is elected, it means the end of the Republic and the world as we know it. LOL.
25 Sep 16
Originally posted by lemon limeApparently it's not a joke (well any more than trump's campaign is) and trump actually plans to bring up Bill Clinton's "sex scandals" at the debate:
You're missing the point. The idea behind having Gennifer Flowers sit in the front row would be to rattle Hillary, not Bill.
Anyone with half a brain knows if Trump suggested this it's obviously a joke and in response to what the Dems have in mind, but I seriously doubt having Cuban sitting in the front row will throw Trump off his game.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-invites-gennifer-flowers-041130740.html
25 Sep 16
Originally posted by no1marauderHow were you able to obtain this information? I'm aware of speculation on how each candidate is (supposedly) preparing for the debate, but you KNOW what Trump plans to do?
Apparently it's not a joke (well any more than trump's campaign is) and trump actually plans to bring up Bill Clinton's "sex scandals" at the debate:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-invites-gennifer-flowers-041130740.html
Originally posted by lemon limeDon't you know how to follow a link? Read the one I provided;
How were you able to obtain this information? I'm aware of speculation on how each candidate is (supposedly) preparing for the debate, but you KNOW what Trump plans to do?
Trump’s campaign also included a brief image of the Clintons in a 1992 60 Minutes interview about Flowers in a recent ad. Former Trump advisor Roger Stone told Newsmax Saturday that if Clinton went on offense at the debate Trump would be prepared to retaliate by bringing up her husband’s sex scandals.
25 Sep 16
Originally posted by mchillAll we know for sure is Cuban will be there, unless he changes his mind or is un-invited.
I want to hear from the 2 candidates, their DETAILED plans for fixing our 2nd rate education system, our crumbling infrastructure, and caring for our homeless vet's. But, I suppose this melodrama with Jennifer flowers and Cuban etc. is more important to many than any substantive issues. 😞
Originally posted by no1marauderYeah, I read the link. Did you? Here is exactly what Trump said without embellishment.
Don't you know how to follow a link? Read the one I provided;
Trump’s campaign also included a brief image of the Clintons in a 1992 60 Minutes interview about Flowers in a recent ad. Former Trump advisor Roger Stone told Newsmax Saturday that if Clinton went on offense at the debate Trump would be prepared to retaliate by bringing up her husband’s sex scandals.
"If dopey Mark Cuban of failed Benefactor fame wants to sit in the front row, perhaps I will put Gennifer Flowers right alongside of him!"
Trump’s campaign also included a brief image of the Clintons...
We're talking about the upcoming debate. You don't know what either candidate is going to say, because neither candidate is going to reveal to the other side what they intend to do or how they will do it. Why would either side want to give the other the advantage of knowing?
Use your head.
Originally posted by lemon limeThe next sentence:
Yeah, I read the link. Did you? Here is exactly what Trump said without embellishment.
"If dopey Mark Cuban of failed Benefactor fame wants to sit in the front row, perhaps I will put Gennifer Flowers right alongside of him!"
Flowers tweeted back at Trump that she was a supporter and would “definitely be at the debate.” Her attendance was confirmed by BuzzFeed and the New York Times.