https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ny-vs-trump-trial-search-imaginary-crime.amp
Seems long, but worth the read, and will definitely have you all seeing the light. This is basically what Marauder has omitted from his opening. Libs never close posts.
There is no crime. Even Goes far enough to show that should the jury find guilty, a reverse will be a no-brainer.
Complements of AvJoe.
224d
@averagejoe1 saidTrump promotes the narrative of persecution. This whole thing is just a fine for business fraud but he wants to be on trial.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ny-vs-trump-trial-search-imaginary-crime.amp
Seems long, but worth the read, and will definitely have you all seeing the light. This is basically what Marauder has omitted from his opening. Libs never close posts.
There is no crime. Even Goes far enough to show that should the jury find guilty, a reverse will be a no-brainer.
Complements of AvJoe.
224d
@AverageJoe1 saidThere seems to be another thread on this:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ny-vs-trump-trial-search-imaginary-crime.amp
Seems long, but worth the read, and will definitely have you all seeing the light. This is basically what Marauder has omitted from his opening. Libs never close posts.
There is no crime. Even Goes far enough to show that should the jury find guilty, a reverse will be a no-brainer.
Complements of AvJoe.
Thread 199542
There seems to have been an indictment and a trial, lets just wait and see results (and the appleal, and the habeas corpus and the last appeal to the Supreme Court (given that the defendand lives that long)
@sonhouse saidSonhouse discounts all posts that are opinion !!!! no wonder he is always just writing to himself.!
@AverageJoe1
All you have to do is look at the title where it says 'opinion'.
@averagejoe1 saidThat's right Joe - Trump's signatures on those checks, recordings in his own voice, bank records, and that parade of his own former staffers testifying against him are all just products of a liberal imagination. They don't really exist.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ny-vs-trump-trial-search-imaginary-crime.amp
Seems long, but worth the read, and will definitely have you all seeing the light. This is basically what Marauder has omitted from his opening. Libs never close posts.
There is no crime. Even Goes far enough to show that should the jury find guilty, a reverse will be a no-brainer.
Complements of AvJoe.
Do you still hear those voices? Do follow her down to a bridge by a fountain. Where rocking horse people eat marshmallow pies? What are your plans when finally release you from the sanitarium. 😏
@mchill saidBe all that as it may, it apparently does not evidence the crime that we are all searching so hard for. The lawyers on both sides are searching so hard, even Trump‘s lawyers are really curious about what the crime is.
That's right Joe - Trump's signatures on those checks, recordings in his own voice, bank records, and that parade of his own former staffers testifying against him are all just products of a liberal imagination. They don't really exist.
Do you still hear those voices? Do follow her down to a bridge by a fountain. Where rocking horse people eat marshmallow pies? What are your plans when finally release you from the sanitarium. 😏
Open your closed mind, you silly goose. You have been around that Sunhouse character too long. Also, possibly blinded by the plethora of links from you know who.
You are all dancing around every morsel that you can find to try to build a case, which is exactly what that Bragg person, who is ruining his career, is doing.
224d
@averagejoe1 saidBe all that as it may, it apparently does not evidence the crime that we are all searching so hard for.
Be all that as it may, it apparently does not evidence the crime that we are all searching so hard for. The lawyers on both sides are searching so hard, even Trump‘s lawyers are really curious about what the crime is.
Open your closed mind, you silly goose. You have been around that Sunhouse character too long. Also, possibly blinded by the plethora of links ...[text shortened]... o try to build a case, which is exactly what that Bragg person, who is ruining his career, is doing.
Dear Joe - Neither you or your favorite news show hosts have access to even 10% of the real evidence the prosecutors have to present in court, so please stop putting your ignorance on display (again) and let the professionals handle this. All you're doing is parroting back what you favorite news guy says.
224d
@mchill saidOK, so you are thus saying that they DO have concrete evidence of a Trump Crime, that, they are holding back for a “zinger’ at the right moment. Just want to be sure we have a solid possibility posed by McHill. Why, you could win the contest!
Be all that as it may, it apparently does not evidence the crime that we are all searching so hard for.
Dear Joe - Neither you or your favorite news show hosts have access to even 10% of the real evidence the prosecutors have to present in court, so please stop putting your ignorance on display (again) and let the professionals handle this. All you're doing is parroting back what you favorite news guy says.
Note to Journal: as of May 1, 90% of the prosecution evidence is being held back from the media (and us!)
224d
@averagejoe1 saidDuh, of course there’s evidence.
OK, so you are thus saying that they DO have concrete evidence of a Trump Crime, that, they are holding back for a “zinger’ at the right moment. Just want to be sure we have a solid possibility posed by McHill. Why, you could win the contest!
Note to Journal: as of May 1, 90% of the prosecution evidence is being held back from the media (and us!)
The question is: is it enough to persuade the jury?
224d
@AverageJoe1
What do you mean WE white man? YOU are already convinced there is no crime and if he is convicted it just proves to you how corrupt the court is AND how corrupt the Jury is even though there are republicans on the jury as well, they must have all been bought off, right?
@averagejoe1 saidLMAO! The only times Gregg Jarrett has appeared in a court room on official legal business AFAIK in the last 40 years or so was to plead guilty to Disorderly Conduct for being a loud, belligerent drunk in a Minneapolis airport. https://apnews.com/article/30462bd1b590434bb2175ea54f83a404
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ny-vs-trump-trial-search-imaginary-crime.amp
Seems long, but worth the read, and will definitely have you all seeing the light. This is basically what Marauder has omitted from his opening. Libs never close posts.
There is no crime. Even Goes far enough to show that should the jury find guilty, a reverse will be a no-brainer.
Complements of AvJoe.
So you can accept his "legal analysis" or you might want to actually read Judge Merchan's (who has over 30 years experience in NY as a prosecutor and judge) February 14, 2024 decision declining to dismiss the indictment. https://casetext.com/case/people-v-trump-20
@no1marauder saidMerchans was bound by his oath rules of the court, etc to recuse himself. You know that. He did not, and so has no credibility with me and many other people. So why would I read anything he writes, especially given the fact of his bias, which has been proven.
LMAO! The only times Gregg Jarrett has appeared in a court room on official legal business AFAIK in the last 40 years or so was to plead guilty to Disorderly Conduct for being a loud, belligerent drunk in a Minneapolis airport. https://apnews.com/article/30462bd1b590434bb2175ea54f83a404
So you can accept his "legal analysis" or you might want to actually read Judge Mer ...[text shortened]... y 14, 2024 decision declining to dismiss the indictment. https://casetext.com/case/people-v-trump-20
@averagejoe1 saidNo, he was not and recusal motions by Trump in the case have been repeatedly denied both by Judge Merchan and higher courts. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/[WORD TOO LONG]/ar-AA1nXbAx
Merchans was bound by his oath rules of the court, etc to recuse himself. You know that. He did not, and so has no credibility with me and many other people. So why would I read anything he writes, especially given the fact of his bias, which has been proven.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24629075-trump-appeal-denial-hush-money
223d
@no1marauder saidI can’t IMAGINE reading links on these issues when the media covers us up hourly, and, importantly, the links are old news……Stuff changes every hour in a world of y’all’s anarchy. Sorry you spent so much research time.
No, he was not and recusal motions by Trump in the case have been repeatedly denied both by Judge Merchan and higher courts. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/[WORD TOO LONG]/ar-AA1nXbAx
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24629075-trump-appeal-denial-hush-money