Go back
This IRONY is absolutely hilarious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  A must see.

This IRONY is absolutely hilarious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A must see.

Debates

1 edit

@no1marauder said
A border to keep out killers and thugs is a good idea.

A border to keep out hard workers and their families because.of their race/ethnicity is a bad idea.
Howbout a border to keep out sluts who screw rich old pedos to get green cards, too?


@AverageJoe1 said
Here is a cut and paste of interest.
What of these proposals of a new liberal president would you adhere to ?

This is from a poster last week, ...what would you do if Trump was gone...

If I was the next president, I would remove everything he has put his name on, everything he tried to take credit for, everything he's done to ruin this once great country. I would i ...[text shortened]... r, who is seemingly mjsguided. Not being of your camp, I am at a loss to respond to such comments.
Dobbs blatantly ignored Roe v Wade's FIFTY YEARS of precedent.


@AverageJoe1 said
Here is a cut and paste of interest.
What of these proposals of a new liberal president would you adhere to ?

This is from a poster last week, ...what would you do if Trump was gone...

If I was the next president, I would remove everything he has put his name on, everything he tried to take credit for, everything he's done to ruin this once great country. I would i ...[text shortened]... r, who is seemingly mjsguided. Not being of your camp, I am at a loss to respond to such comments.
Because they make far more sense than you do.


@no1marauder said
We know what they wrote which was the scope of women's rights are limited to what all-male legislatures put into office by an all-male electorate thought was appropriate more than 150 years ago.
Yes, we know WHAT they wrote, but some people do not understand the REASONING of hours of deliberations. You were not in the room, so read their learned decisions.
Can you picture that Jackson Brown judge in such deliberations? brrrrrrrrr


@no1marauder said
YOU brought up the Dobbs decision which was a refutation of the idea that woman have the same rights as men over their bodies. There's nothing in the Constitution supporting that and the 14th Amendment expressly declares differently.
??? Yes, whatever, but they need to exercise their rights which you speak of in the proper jurisdiction, the states. Was that not the issue?