06 Oct 23
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67024517
Ex-President Donald Trump has asked a federal court to dismiss the election interference case against him, arguing his role entitled him to "absolute immunity".
Mr Trump's lawyers say his attempts to cast doubt on the 2020 election fell within his duties as president and are not subject to criminal prosecution.
The claims were "at the heart of his official responsibilities", they argue.
Oh well.
06 Oct 23
@shavixmir
Here is an excerpt from the link you posted:
"In the criminal complaint against the former president, the special prosecutor acknowledged that Mr Trump "had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won".
However he alleged that Mr Trump went further than allowed and "also pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results".
How did Trump pursue unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes?
06 Oct 23
@metal-brain saidThe point I’m making is that he has now admitted to having had an active role in it all.
@shavixmir
Here is an excerpt from the link you posted:
"In the criminal complaint against the former president, the special prosecutor acknowledged that Mr Trump "had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won".
However he all ...[text shortened]... rting the election results".
How did Trump pursue unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes?
I’ll let the judges decide if that’s legal or not, in American law.
From my perspective, a democratic leader cannot undermine democracy. And the claims have been proven unsubstantial. Yet he continues his rhetoric of stolen elections.
06 Oct 23
@shavixmir saidHe thinks he's entitled to be President. Everything else must be lies or a witch-hunt designed to strip him of his entitlement.
The point I’m making is that he has now admitted to having had an active role in it all.
I’ll let the judges decide if that’s legal or not, in American law.
From my perspective, a democratic leader cannot undermine democracy. And the claims have been proven unsubstantial. Yet he continues his rhetoric of stolen elections.
Just think we used to sneer at entitled trust fund kids. He thinks E stands for Entitled to Everything and his Ego Excuses Everything.
06 Oct 23
@metal-brain saidStill didn't bother to read the indictment, I see.
@shavixmir
Here is an excerpt from the link you posted:
"In the criminal complaint against the former president, the special prosecutor acknowledged that Mr Trump "had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won".
However he all ...[text shortened]... rting the election results".
How did Trump pursue unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes?
06 Oct 23
@no1marauder saidThat might spoil his simpleton I mean simple one eyed view and we can't have that, unless of course there's a conspiracy to uncover
Still didn't bother to read the indictment, I see.
06 Oct 23
@metal-brain saidHe phoned state election officials and asked them to conjure up votes for himself that did not exist, we all heard him do it dummy.
@shavixmir
Here is an excerpt from the link you posted:
"In the criminal complaint against the former president, the special prosecutor acknowledged that Mr Trump "had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won".
However he all ...[text shortened]... rting the election results".
How did Trump pursue unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes?
A jury will decide if that amounts to attempted electoral fraud, stop trying to interfere with justice
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
06 Oct 23
@shavixmir saidWhere does it say he admitted to election meddling?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67024517
Ex-President Donald Trump has asked a federal court to dismiss the election interference case against him, arguing his role entitled him to "absolute immunity".
Mr Trump's lawyers say his attempts to cast doubt on the 2020 election fell within his duties as president and are not subject to criminal prosecution.
The claims were "at the heart of his official responsibilities", they argue.
Oh well.
Oh well, just another lib-lie.
06 Oct 23
@jj-adams saidWell he’s saying he was allowed to election medal by virtue of being the president in response to charges of election meddling. There are only two dots and you still cannot join them 🙄
Where does it say he admitted to election meddling?
Oh well, just another lib-lie.
Oh well another dense MAGA
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
06 Oct 23
@kevcvs57 saidNo he said he had the right to speak out about the election being fraudulent.
Well he’s saying he was allowed to election medal by virtue of being the president in response to charges of election meddling. There are only two dots and you still cannot join them 🙄
Oh well another dense MAGA
What is an election medal?
06 Oct 23
@no1marauder saidI read it you idiot. Did you read this part?
Still didn't bother to read the indictment, I see.
"In the criminal complaint against the former president, the special prosecutor acknowledged that Mr Trump "had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won".
He had a right to make false claims about the election. His crime? Exercising that right. You are such a retard!
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147485
06 Oct 23
@divegeester saidany time now 😂 damn they sure know how to play you idiots
Surely this is finally the end for Trump?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147485
06 Oct 23
@metal-brain saida queer retard!
I read it you idiot. Did you read this part?
"In the criminal complaint against the former president, the special prosecutor acknowledged that Mr Trump "had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won".
He had a right to make false claims about the election. His crime? Exercising that right. You are such a retard!
@metal-brain saidBy causing sealed voting machines to be seized and breached; by engaging false electors to submit bogus results; …
@shavixmir
Here is an excerpt from the link you posted:
"In the criminal complaint against the former president, the special prosecutor acknowledged that Mr Trump "had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won".
However he all ...[text shortened]... rting the election results".
How did Trump pursue unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes?