12 Nov 19
Now we learn Trump stopped Javelin missiles going to Ukraine because he thought it would upset the Russians, IE, Putin.
Putin had been working Trump since 1977 and they knew Trump wanted one thing, money, lots of money and the Moscow Trump Tower.
Now we realize the Putin job was the greatest spy story of all time, and now we see the result. Trump held up the 400 mil to Ukraine because he didn't want to upset his buddy Putin.
I have said he is treasonous but now I KNOW he is a traitor, knowingly or unknowingly a pawn of Putin.
12 Nov 19
@mister-moggy
Do you not worry how DUPED you are? What I said was true. The fact you are a Trump sycophant says a LOT about you.
12 Nov 19
@sonhouse saidyour boy president Obama would not give Ukraine any lethal weapons. NONE!
Now we learn Trump stopped Javelin missiles going to Ukraine because he thought it would upset the Russians, IE, Putin.
Putin had been working Trump since 1977 and they knew Trump wanted one thing, money, lots of money and the Moscow Trump Tower.
Now we realize the Putin job was the greatest spy story of all time, and now we see the result. Trump held up the 400 mil to U ...[text shortened]... have said he is treasonous but now I KNOW he is a traitor, knowingly or unknowingly a pawn of Putin.
12 Nov 19
@Mott-The-Hoople
believe it or not, the kenyan only sent blankets to the ukraine when the russians were moving into two of their provinces. this is what "the king" thought was good enough for military supplies. trump sent javelin missiles which are capable against russian tanks.
( but vr and wolfgang, etc...the usual crew...will lie about these facts ).
13 Nov 19
@mister-moggy
Sure, he sent money after he was caught extorting the Ukraine to provide dirt on Biden specifically to help Trump in his re-election bid.
For someone claiming never to have voted for Trump, you spend a lot of type defending him.
13 Nov 19
@mister-moggy said(do you not worry why you hate so much ? )
@sonhouse
and he fed bacon sandwhiches to the king of saudi arabia when the king was sleeping on air force one.
what other demented ideas do you wish to push ?
( do you not worry why you hate so much ? )
You know very well if someone named Obama or Clinton had tried to rig an American election in their favor, using taxpayer resources to bait another country into investigating a political rival, you'd be screaming "Traitor" from the rooftops.
(why you hypocrite so much ?)
13 Nov 19
@mott-the-hoople saidTrump opposed such providing lethal weaponry to the Ukrainians and had the Republican party platform in 2016 adjusted to delete support for such aid:
your boy president Obama would not give Ukraine any lethal weapons. NONE!
The Trump campaign worked behind the scenes last week to make sure the new Republican platform won’t call for giving weapons to Ukraine to fight Russian and rebel forces, contradicting the view of almost all Republican foreign policy leaders in Washington.
Throughout the campaign, Trump has been dismissive of calls for supporting the Ukraine government as it fights an ongoing Russian-led intervention. Trump’s campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, worked as a lobbyist for the Russian-backed former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych for more than a decade.
Still, Republican delegates at last week’s national security committee platform meeting in Cleveland were surprised when the Trump campaign orchestrated a set of events to make sure that the GOP would not pledge to give Ukraine the weapons it has been asking for from the United States.
Inside the meeting, Diana Denman, a platform committee member from Texas who was a Ted Cruz supporter, proposed a platform amendment that would call for maintaining or increasing sanctions against Russia, increasing aid for Ukraine and “providing lethal defensive weapons” to the Ukrainian military.
“Today, the post-Cold War ideal of a ‘Europe whole and free’ is being severely tested by Russia’s ongoing military aggression in Ukraine,” the amendment read. “The Ukrainian people deserve our admiration and support in their struggle.”
Trump staffers in the room, who are not delegates but are there to oversee the process, intervened. By working with pro-Trump delegates, they were able to get the issue tabled while they devised a method to roll back the language.
On the sideline, Denman tried to persuade the Trump staffers not to change the language, but failed. “I was troubled when they put aside my amendment and then watered it down,” Denman told me. “I said, ‘What is your problem with a country that wants to remain free?’ It seems like a simple thing.”
Finally, Trump staffers wrote an amendment to Denman’s amendment that stripped out the platform’s call for “providing lethal defensive weapons” and replaced it with softer language calling for “appropriate assistance.”
That amendment was voted on and passed. When the Republican Party releases its platform Monday, the official Republican party position on arms for Ukraine will be at odds with almost all the party’s national security leaders.
“This is another example of Trump being out of step with GOP leadership and the mainstream in a way that shows he would be dangerous for America and the world,” said Rachel Hoff, another platform committee member who was in the room."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/trump-campaign-guts-gops-anti-russia-stance-on-ukraine/2016/07/18/98adb3b0-4cf3-11e6-a7d8-13d06b37f256_story.html
"
13 Nov 19
@no1marauder saidyou post a wapo OPINION piece as fact. This is getting old! 🙄
Trump opposed such providing lethal weaponry to the Ukrainians and had the Republican party platform in 2016 adjusted to delete support for such aid:
The Trump campaign worked behind the scenes last week to make sure the new Republican platform won’t call for giving weapons to Ukraine to fight Russian and rebel forces, contradicting the view of almost all Republican fo ...[text shortened]... s-gops-anti-russia-stance-on-ukraine/2016/07/18/98adb3b0-4cf3-11e6-a7d8-13d06b37f256_story.html
"
13 Nov 19
@sonhouse saidYou are on it, you must have a ton of research and flat proof!!! Surely you would be welcome as a witness today. Why don't they already know that, and have impeached him months ago?
Now we learn Trump stopped Javelin missiles going to Ukraine because he thought it would upset the Russians, IE, Putin.
Putin had been working Trump since 1977 and they knew Trump wanted one thing, money, lots of money and the Moscow Trump Tower.
Now we realize the Putin job was the greatest spy story of all time, and now we see the result. Trump held up the 400 mil to U ...[text shortened]... have said he is treasonous but now I KNOW he is a traitor, knowingly or unknowingly a pawn of Putin.
13 Nov 19
@mott-the-hoople saidAre you seriously denying the facts contained in it? They were common knowledge at the time.
you post a wapo OPINION piece as fact. This is getting old! 🙄
Burying your head in the sand doesn't change reality, Mott.
13 Nov 19
@no1marauder
He knows that good and well but he is in his Russian agent persona and keeps pumping out BS so his Russian handlers are happy.
13 Nov 19
@mister-moggy saidYou might want to avoid using words like "demented", or at least switch on your spell-checker, if you are going to utterly butcher words like "sandwiches".
@sonhouse
and he fed bacon sandwhiches to the king of saudi arabia when the king was sleeping on air force one.
what other demented ideas do you wish to push ?
( do you not worry why you hate so much ? )
13 Nov 19
@deepthought saidspell ckeck is a last resort 🙄
You might want to avoid using words like "demented", or at least switch on your spell-checker, if you are going to utterly butcher words like "sandwiches".