@Suzianne
I don't think he dares read the actual indictment, he much rather prefers to remain in the dark so he can make pronouncements as if they were real. We all saw what happened right on TV and of course the zombie crowd HAS to deny the whole affair was nothing but a peaceful political discourse.
And it is not like a bunch of heathen democrats frothing at the mouth to "Get Trump'', ALL the co-conspirators were REPUBS.
So where is this massive democrat run Biden leading the charge against Trump?
It didn't happen that way, the start of course was the Pelosi hearings and all the details brought out, that had to happen before Garland was able to pull the trigger and indict Trump. One worry, Alito has the power to stop the trial from going public and he would do that for the specific purpose of his way of defending Trump by hiding all the dirty details from the public and all we will hear is guilty as charged and of course that is not the end, there will be YEARS of appeals way past the '24 elections and if Trump becomes POTUS again, he of course will squash the entire ensemble of charges, pardon himself and continue on his fascist path to take over just like Naten YAHOO is doing in Israel.
@Mott-The-Hoople
And this story in the Post has to deal with the indictment of Trump how?
Oh yeah, yet another pathetic attempt at distraction from the main event, Trump being the head snake along with Eastman, Rudi, and the fake electors, ALL REPUBLICANS, no witch hunting dems invovled execpt Pelosi doing her hearings PERFECTLY.
No chance for Jim Jordan blustering bullshyte.
@sonhouse saidWhataboutism is a tacit admission of hypocrisy. You want Trump in jail for thought crimes, but all the things you want Trump in jail for Hitlery did before him spreading disinformation about Russian collusion with Trump.
@Metal-Brain
What we want is for you to stop harping on Hillary, it does you no good and makes you continue to look like a fool.
We are talking about TRUMP charges. Got that part? We are through with Hillary and her emails.
Whataboutisms are old news.
https://rumble.com/v33z1p1-august-1-2023.html
If Hitlery has the right to lie about the election so does Trump. Why isn't Hitlery being indicted?
@metal-brain saidStop lying, already.
Whataboutism is a tacit admission of hypocrisy. You want Trump in jail for thought crimes, but all the things you want Trump in jail for Hitlery did before him spreading disinformation about Russian collusion with Trump.
https://rumble.com/v33z1p1-august-1-2023.html
If Hitlery has the right to lie about the election so does Trump. Why isn't Hitlery being indicted?
@metal-brain saidSounds like you think it's about lying to people.
@sonhouse
This is about reality and hypocrisy. Hitlery did the same thing. Why is she not being indicted?
https://rumble.com/v33z1p1-august-1-2023.html
Just stop lying.
@Suzianne
You are not the thought police. You don't know what Trump was thinking anymore than you know what Hitlery was thinking. This is a free speech issue. People have the right to allege election fraud and election meddling. You want it to be illegal.
That means you want democracy to be illegal.
@metal-brain saidInciting a crowd to Insurrection IS illegal.
@Suzianne
You are not the thought police. You don't know what Trump was thinking anymore than you know what Hitlery was thinking. This is a free speech issue. People have the right to allege election fraud and election meddling. You want it to be illegal.
That means you want democracy to be illegal.
We don't need to "mind read". We have his own spoken words. Words he uttered that day and words he used to describe what he'd do if he got back in the Oval Office.
@suzianne saidHe called for peaceful protests. That is not inciting an insurrection which is why he was not charged for that. He has a right to speak just like Hitlery did when she lied about the 2016 election.
Inciting a crowd to Insurrection IS illegal.
We don't need to "mind read". We have his own spoken words. Words he uttered that day and words he used to describe what he'd do if he got back in the Oval Office.
If challenging elections is prohibited you will have no democracy.
@metal-brain saidInciting a crowd to Insurrection IS illegal.
He called for peaceful protests. That is not inciting an insurrection which is why he was not charged for that. He has a right to speak just like Hitlery did when she lied about the 2016 election.
If challenging elections is prohibited you will have no democracy.
We don't need to "mind read". We have his own spoken words. Words he uttered that day and words he used to describe what he'd do if he got back in the Oval Office.
@suzianne saidWhat words?
Inciting a crowd to Insurrection IS illegal.
We don't need to "mind read". We have his own spoken words. Words he uttered that day and words he used to describe what he'd do if he got back in the Oval Office.
He said to peacefully protest. That is not illegal and it is certainly not an insurrection.
@vivify saidI saw that when I went to Wikipedia.
I wasn't aware of him prior to your post. After looking him up, it seems they believed he was hiding more than he let on:
http://law2.umkc.edu/Faculty/projects/ftrials/lincolnconspiracy/mudd.html
In school, I learned that he had gotten railroaded into prison because the nation wanted SOMEone to pay for Lincoln's death.
I wasn't aware of these new questions about his involvement.