@metal-brain saidDon't you know that debating while stupid is a fool's errand?
Spreading lies about the election is not illegal. Even the DOJ stated that in the indictment. They claim it is for "conduct".
What conduct?
1 edit
@suzianne saidI'm discussing a little ole thing called freedom of expression, you're ranting like an ijit.
Stop lying about what happened at the Capitol on Jan. 6.
You're disgusting. All your talk about being against force and use of force, then you defend the Capitol insurrectionists?
Zero credibility. Thanks for playing. I hope defending slime like Trump is worth it to you.
See the difference?
If you were to deny the things that I related in my post happened, iit would be you that is the liar. Plenty of vids available.
@Metal-Brain
You show your stupidity every time you post. He is a lawyer you idiot and he most certainly read the indictment, and all it shows is you don't WANT to read it or you might have to change your mind which, because your mind is metal, and I think that metal is silicon, you are like a robot chat line never able to actually change.
All you have to do is read the indictment yourself and maybe you can have some real talking points, till then, you are flailing around in the dark. You LOVE the dark however.
@metal-brain saidStop lying!
@sonhouse
Democrats did it first, 60 years earlier in Hawaii.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/02/07/1960-electoral-college-certificates-false-trump-electors-00006186
You are holding a double standard.
I'm getting real tired of this particular lie. The two are not the same, and you know it.
@wajoma saidNot Tucker's altered videos, you freaking moron.
I'm discussing a little ole thing called freedom of expression, you're ranting like an ijit.
See the difference?
If you were to deny the things that I related in my post happened, iit would be you that is the liar. Plenty of vids available.
@metal-brain saidNo1 already laid it out for you, but you're too dumb to read, I guess.
Great! Then tell me the differences. Show us all how they are different. Prove it is a lie.
@suzianne saidNo he did not. All he did was double down on his lie. The election was certified for Nixon when the electors submitted the certificates and Nixon ended up losing that election.
No1 already laid it out for you, but you're too dumb to read, I guess.
The main difference was the outcome of the election. You never read any of the links I post. You just call them a lie not knowing at all what is in them.