- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleMTH is on a real misinformation tear this morning. The pressure is building.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31017/secret-iranian-missile-base-found-thought-be-ryan-saavedra
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
Originally posted by @wolfe63If you never read links before commenting you will continually look foolish.
If you feed your mind poison...it's unlikely you'll ever think sweetly.
DANGER POISON 😕 :
"The Daily Wire is an American conservative news and opinion website founded in 2015 by political commentator Ben Shapiro."
Daily wire was referencing a >new york times< article.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
24 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleNot a word about nuclear missiles anywhere in the article.
[b]If you never read links before commenting you will continually look foolish.
Daily wire was referencing a >new york times< article.[/b]
The agreement with Iran regarded nuclear weapons. SQUASH!
I get it now: You come from the crowd who get their kicks from yelling FIRE in sold-out theaters.
24 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleFrom the NYT article:
[b]If you never read links before commenting you will continually look foolish.
Daily wire was referencing a >new york times< article.[/b]
"Such a program would not violate the international deal intended to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, or any other formal agreement."
So...Trump was wrong. Again.
24 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleWhy not link directly to the NYT article then?
[b]If you never read links before commenting you will continually look foolish.
Daily wire was referencing a >new york times< article.[/b]
(Cut out the middleman. You played Chinese Whispers as a kid, right?)'
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
24 May 18
Originally posted by @wolfgang59why? to keep you from making a fool of yourself?
Why not link directly to the NYT article then?
(Cut out the middleman. You played Chinese Whispers as a kid, right?)'
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
Originally posted by @vivifythat is no where in the article...why are you lying?
From the NYT article:
"Such a program would not violate the international deal intended to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, or any other formal agreement."
So...Trump was wrong. Again.
but this is...
"Five outside experts who independently reviewed the findings agreed that there was compelling evidence that Iran is developing long-range missile technology."
24 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleI haven't made a fool of myself, but you just have, again!
why? to keep you from making a fool of yourself?
24 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleMott, you're a dumbass. What's to stop anyone from clicking that NYT link in your article to verify what I've said? Do you really think anyone finds you even the least bit credible to just take your word?
that is no where in the article...why are you lying?
24 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleThat's why you go to the source article instead of some moron website's spin on it.
that is no where in the article...why are you lying?
but this is...
"Five outside experts who independently reviewed the findings agreed that there was compelling evidence that Iran is developing long-range missile technology."
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
25 May 18
Originally posted by @vivifyyou could always C&P it...and prove you are not lying...but you cant.
Mott, you're a dumbass. What's to stop anyone from clicking that NYT link in your article to verify what I've said? Do you really think anyone finds you even the least bit credible to just take your word?
25 May 18
Originally posted by @wolfgang59Why link to the NY article at all?
Why not link directly to the NYT article then?
(Cut out the middleman. You played Chinese Whispers as a kid, right?)'
The Daily Caller article quotes extensively and frames the portion that MTH believes is most relevant to the reader.
MOREOVER, nothing was said specifically about nuclear weapons (another complaint that you had about this).
That is a clever moving of the goal posts.