Go back
Trump is right AGAIN!

Trump is right AGAIN!

Debates


https://www.dailywire.com/news/31017/secret-iranian-missile-base-found-thought-be-ryan-saavedra


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31017/secret-iranian-missile-base-found-thought-be-ryan-saavedra
MTH is on a real misinformation tear this morning. The pressure is building.


If you feed your mind poison...it's unlikely you'll ever think sweetly.

DANGER POISON 😕 :
"The Daily Wire is an American conservative news and opinion website founded in 2015 by political commentator Ben Shapiro."

1 edit

Originally posted by @wolfe63
If you feed your mind poison...it's unlikely you'll ever think sweetly.

DANGER POISON 😕 :
"The Daily Wire is an American conservative news and opinion website founded in 2015 by political commentator Ben Shapiro."
If you never read links before commenting you will continually look foolish.
Daily wire was referencing a >new york times< article.


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
[b]If you never read links before commenting you will continually look foolish.
Daily wire was referencing a >new york times< article.
[/b]
Not a word about nuclear missiles anywhere in the article.
The agreement with Iran regarded nuclear weapons. SQUASH!

I get it now: You come from the crowd who get their kicks from yelling FIRE in sold-out theaters.


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
[b]If you never read links before commenting you will continually look foolish.
Daily wire was referencing a >new york times< article.
[/b]
From the NYT article:

"Such a program would not violate the international deal intended to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, or any other formal agreement."

So...Trump was wrong. Again.


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
[b]If you never read links before commenting you will continually look foolish.
Daily wire was referencing a >new york times< article.
[/b]
Why not link directly to the NYT article then?
(Cut out the middleman. You played Chinese Whispers as a kid, right?)'


Originally posted by @wolfgang59
Why not link directly to the NYT article then?
(Cut out the middleman. You played Chinese Whispers as a kid, right?)'
why? to keep you from making a fool of yourself?

1 edit

Originally posted by @vivify
From the NYT article:

"Such a program would not violate the international deal intended to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, or any other formal agreement."

So...Trump was wrong. Again.
that is no where in the article...why are you lying?

but this is...

"Five outside experts who independently reviewed the findings agreed that there was compelling evidence that Iran is developing long-range missile technology."


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
why? to keep you from making a fool of yourself?
I haven't made a fool of myself, but you just have, again!


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
that is no where in the article...why are you lying?
Mott, you're a dumbass. What's to stop anyone from clicking that NYT link in your article to verify what I've said? Do you really think anyone finds you even the least bit credible to just take your word?


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
that is no where in the article...why are you lying?

but this is...

"Five outside experts who independently reviewed the findings agreed that there was compelling evidence that Iran is developing long-range missile technology."
That's why you go to the source article instead of some moron website's spin on it.


Originally posted by @vivify
Mott, you're a dumbass. What's to stop anyone from clicking that NYT link in your article to verify what I've said? Do you really think anyone finds you even the least bit credible to just take your word?
you could always C&P it...and prove you are not lying...but you cant.


Originally posted by @suzianne
That's why you go to the source article instead of some moron website's spin on it.
ummm, it was the article verbatim


Originally posted by @wolfgang59
Why not link directly to the NYT article then?
(Cut out the middleman. You played Chinese Whispers as a kid, right?)'
Why link to the NY article at all?

The Daily Caller article quotes extensively and frames the portion that MTH believes is most relevant to the reader.

MOREOVER, nothing was said specifically about nuclear weapons (another complaint that you had about this).

That is a clever moving of the goal posts.