Originally posted by @philokaliaOK, so Trump was right................. about what?
Why link to the NY article at all?
The Daily Caller article quotes extensively and frames the portion that MTH believes is most relevant to the reader.
MOREOVER, nothing was said specifically about nuclear weapons (another complaint that you had about this).
That is a clever moving of the goal posts.
Originally posted by @no1marauderThat, my friend, is a contradiction.
OK, so Trump was right................. about what?
Originally posted by @philokaliaLiar (again)
MOREOVER, nothing was said specifically about nuclear weapons (another complaint that you had about this).
Never complained about that.
Originally posted by @philokaliaThere's a reason why Mott posted this: because it filters the facts from the NYT article through a conservative lens. For example, the Daily Caller (as Mott pointed out) left out that Iran's "secret" program doesn't violate the Nuclear Treaty.
Why link to the NY article at all?
The Daily Caller article quotes extensively and frames the portion that MTH believes is most relevant to the reader.
MOREOVER, nothing was said specifically about nuclear weapons (another complaint that you had about this).
That is a clever moving of the goal posts.
As a die-hard Trump supporter, that's not what you want to hear. No, you want the more salacious bits that feed your biases. The Daily Caller accomplishes this by giving it's own spin a respected news source to give it the appearance of legitimacy.
So that's why you link to the source, rather than the hillbilly version.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
Originally posted by @vivify"Dumbing down" current world events and news for conservative consumption is nothing new. FOX has been doing it for years.
There's a reason why Mott posted this: because it filters the facts from the NYT article through a conservative lens. For example, the Daily Caller (as Mott pointed out) left out that Iran's "secret" program doesn't violate the Nuclear Treaty.
As a die-hard Trump supporter, that's not what you want to hear. No, you want the more salacious bits that fe ...[text shortened]... nce of legitimacy.
So that's why you link to the source, rather than the hillbilly version.
Originally posted by @vivifythe agreement is no longer in place...you defend ms 13, Iranian terrorist, worship a prostitute...what a sad life you must have. For this not to violate the agreement just goes to show how bad the Obama agreement was. And no, it was not a treaty, that only goes to show your ignorance.
There's a reason why Mott posted this: because it filters the facts from the NYT article through a conservative lens. For example, the Daily Caller (as Mott pointed out) left out that Iran's "secret" program doesn't violate the Nuclear Treaty.
As a die-hard Trump supporter, that's not what you want to hear. No, you want the more salacious bits that fe ...[text shortened]... nce of legitimacy.
So that's why you link to the source, rather than the hillbilly version.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleMob rule is not a something to celebrate my conservative friend.
Must be doing something right...FOX has the HIGHEST ratings of ALL MSM. Deal with it! LOL
3 edits
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleThat means nothing. They have no other conservative cable news networks to compete with.
Must be doing something right...FOX has the HIGHEST ratings of ALL MSM. Deal with it! LOL
Furthermore, your claim is not even true. Fox News averages two million prime time viewers; Stephen Colbert averages 4 million viewers a night, and it's even higher when you factor in his YouTube views for the same show.