1 edit
@no1marauder saidYour defense of Iran is that you hate trump, it doesn’t matter what he does with any of you. Go back and read a month’s worth of your post and look how much you post with little facts vrs hate speech. Heck all you libs do that.
It's very possible that this is just one of his tantrums that winds up to be a bluff (though he'll surely claim some changed circumstances).
However, if it goes ahead and it fails to move the Iranian government's position (as is a near certainty), what then? Ground invasion? Deployment of nuclear weapons?
It is certainly worrying to have this raving nut have the power to do either.
@no1marauder saidWon’t they have to?!?? of course they are more likely, being animals, to kill everything that moves all around them until we find there is a different kind of peace, which we will find on the lands of Iran as the smoke dissipates.
So IF Trump goes ahead and destroys a bunch of civilian infrastructure like bridges and power stations, what then? Surely you're not deluded enough to believe that will cause the Iranian government to simply fold and accede to whatever he demands.
Or are you?
@Great-King-Rat saidNo reason?
Word salad.
I was a lot more succinct when I said “yeah, he said this, but he probably meant that other thing”.
Then again, you had no problem with Renee Good being murdered by the state for no reason, so why should an Iranian genocide bother you?
@AverageJoe1 saidWhat does that even mean?
Won’t they have to?!?? of course they are more likely, being animals, to kill everything that moves all around them until we find there is a different kind of peace, which we will find on the lands of Iran as the smoke dissipates.
There's 90 million Iranians, how many should the US kill?
@mike69 saidI've been against US military interventions long before this babbling fool landed in the White House.
Your defense of Iran is that you hate trump, it doesn’t matter what he does with any of you. Go back and read a month’s worth of your post and look how much you post with little facts vrs hate speech. Heck all you libs do that.
@no1marauder saidYou’re against putting an end of almost 50 years of terrorism around the world, you’re the babbling fool and those like you.
I've been against US military interventions long before this babbling fool landed in the White House.
@no1marauder saidHow many do they have to kill before you wake up?
What does that even mean?
There's 90 million Iranians, how many should the US kill?
@mike69 saidIf you haven't learned by now that US military interventions and meddling in the Middle East don't "end terrorism" then you're probably too stupid to waste any further time on.
You’re against putting an end of almost 50 years of terrorism around the world, you’re the babbling fool and those like you.
The quickest way to vastly reduce terrorism emanating from that area would be to cut off military add to Israel unless they agree to a just peace settlement with the Palestinians.
@no1marauder said🤥
If you haven't learned by now that US military interventions and meddling in the Middle East don't "end terrorism" then you're probably too stupid to waste any further time on.
The quickest way to vastly reduce terrorism emanating from that area would be to cut off military add to Israel unless they agree to a just peace settlement with the Palestinians.
@no1marauder saidHow do you play chess, do you cheat?
So you really don't have idea what to actually do then if and when this "plan" fails, do you?
Ground invasion?
Nuclear war?
Or anything the Great and Powerful Oz decrees?
@no1marauder saidThe question is how many bridges should they take out. I sincerely believe they want this to happen to them and go to heaven, which bears out the point that we might as well keep on keeping on rather than dwell with mad dogs in the future.
What does that even mean?
There's 90 million Iranians, how many should the US kill?
I vote take out the bridges. Maybe not the power plants for now , maybe that’s what he will decide. Oh no …if he does that then Susie will call him a liar.
If they put children at the power plants, certainly do not bomb the plants for now just bomb everything around it to smithereens all the roads all the bridges every office building and then a month from now when the children go home, we bomb the power plants.
But wait, if we have to wait a month, does that mean he lied? Lies!!!! I wonder if he sent a few billion dollars to some country in the middle of the night. All cash…. there is so much to learn.
@no1marauder saidWrong. The quickest way to end terrorism is to kill all terrorists, without making any deals to pacify them. Just kill the bastards, and all who are likely to grow up to be terrorists. Good F.. riddance.
If you haven't learned by now that US military interventions and meddling in the Middle East don't "end terrorism" then you're probably too stupid to waste any further time on.
The quickest way to vastly reduce terrorism emanating from that area would be to cut off military add to Israel unless they agree to a just peace settlement with the Palestinians.
@AverageJoe1 saidAnd that would accomplish ..................................... what exactly?
The question is how many bridges should they take out. I sincerely believe they want this to happen to them and go to heaven, which bears out the point that we might as well keep on keeping on rather than dwell with mad dogs in the future.
I vote take out the bridges. Maybe not the power plants for now , maybe that’s what he will decide. Oh no …if he does that then Su ...[text shortened]... ew billion dollars to some country in the middle of the night. All cash…. there is so much to learn.
In a month or less, people in the US will be paying over $5 a gallon for gas.