@ponderable saidIf there was ANY evidence in support of this, the Trump legal team would be already in court with it. That means that the Trump legal team haven't been able to find any evidence in support of this particular bit of wishful thinking.
One thesis:
"The voting machines were programmed to allocate votes with a bias toward Biden. "
If there is any proof for that it should be enough to overturn the election.
The same applies to all the fairy tales being put out on display from the group of sore losers that are infesting the airwaves.
@kewpie said"If there was ANY evidence in support of this, the Trump legal team would be already in court with it."
If there was ANY evidence in support of this, the Trump legal team would be already in court with it. That means that the Trump legal team haven't been able to find any evidence in support of this particular bit of wishful thinking.
The same applies to all the fairy tales being put out on display from the group of sore losers that are infesting the airwaves.
They are.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/election-fraud-michigan-arizona-georgia/5731241
They have the evidence and it has been heard in Michigan. The problem is that the corporate news media is ignoring it and pretending it doesn't exist or omitting the substance of it.
1 edit
@metal-brain saidRemember when you ridiculed claims made by Sydney Powell? Now you are claiming that her allegations are credible!
"If there was ANY evidence in support of this, the Trump legal team would be already in court with it."
They are.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/election-fraud-michigan-arizona-georgia/5731241
They have the evidence and it has been heard in Michigan. The problem is that the corporate news media is ignoring it and pretending it doesn't exist or omitting the substance of it.
Sure, Trump's lawyers and minions are making such claims in multiple lawsuits, and those lawsuits are being quickly dismissed by judges (many of whom are Republicans and some of whom were appointed by Trump himself). Here's a brief rundown: https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923-a918a2527931
@no1marauder saidAre you claiming every allegation she makes cannot possibly be true? She probably heard that lie on the Rush Limbaugh show and failed to fact check it like I did.
Remember when you ridiculed claims made by Sydney Powell? Now you are claiming that her allegations are credible!
Sure, Trump's lawyers and minions are making such claims in multiple lawsuits, and those lawsuits are being quickly dismissed by judges (many of whom are Republicans and some of whom were appointed by Trump himself). Here's a brief rundown: https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923-a918a2527931
You can't blame her that much. You heard Trump's claims of election fraud were unfounded and assumed no election fraud happens. Then we all found out that wasn't true so the corporate news media changed it to widespread fraud. You are guilty of the same thing so you should not judge so much.
Sydney Powell is one several of Trump's lawyers and you should expect them to all make claims that are consistent with the case. Sydney Powell wasn't even in the hearing in Michigan that I noticed and if you had watched any of the video you would know that.
The allegations in that hearing involved an Indian American telling how she was ordered to do things that amounted to election fraud. It isn't about Sydney Powell.
1 edit
@metal-brain saidIt was Trump who claimed the election fraud was widespread, not the "corporate news media."
You heard Trump's claims of election fraud were unfounded and assumed no election fraud happens. Then we all found out that wasn't true so the corporate news media changed it to widespread fraud.
@metal-brain saidLMAO! She's making the exact same claims in a lawsuit filed in Georgia.
Are you claiming every allegation she makes cannot possibly be true? She probably heard that lie on the Rush Limbaugh show and failed to fact check it like I did.
You can't blame her that much. You heard Trump's claims of election fraud were unfounded and assumed no election fraud happens. Then we all found out that wasn't true so the corporate news media changed it to ...[text shortened]... ling how she was ordered to do things that amounted to election fraud. It isn't about Sydney Powell.
@handyandy saidTrump had NEVER used the word widespread when he started talking about it. Trump simply complained about election fraud and the corporate news media said it was unfounded. It was a lie.
It was Trump who claimed the election fraud was widespread, not the "corporate news media."
When it became apparent election fraud exists they changed it to widespread fraud in hopes most people would not notice. Krebs is doing that too. Now that it is apparent Krebs' tweet that got him fired was inaccurate just as Trump said he is changing his wording so it is not false anymore. They are hoping you will not notice.
@no1marauder saidWhat is your source of information?
LMAO! She's making the exact same claims in a lawsuit filed in Georgia.
1 edit
@metal-brain saidHer lawsuit itself. I gave you the link in the other thread.
What is your source of information?
@metal-brain saidThis from Trump on Nov. 5 (caps his):
Trump had NEVER used the word widespread when he started talking about it. Trump simply complained about election fraud and the corporate news media said it was unfounded. It was a lie.
When it became apparent election fraud exists they changed it to widespread fraud in hopes most people would not notice. Krebs is doing that too. Now that it is apparent Krebs' tweet th ...[text shortened]... ump said he is changing his wording so it is not false anymore. They are hoping you will not notice.
“IF YOU COUNT THE LEGAL VOTES, I EASILY WIN THE ELECTION! IF YOU COUNT THE ILLEGAL AND LATE VOTES, THEY CAN STEAL THE ELECTION FROM US!”
Sounds widespread, doesn't it?
@no1marauder saidNo, not Georgia. You said Michigan.
Her lawsuit itself. I gave you the link in the other thread.
1 edit
@handyandy said"Sounds widespread, doesn't it?"
This from Trump on Nov. 5 (caps his):
“IF YOU COUNT THE LEGAL VOTES, I EASILY WIN THE ELECTION! IF YOU COUNT THE ILLEGAL AND LATE VOTES, THEY CAN STEAL THE ELECTION FROM US!”
Sounds widespread, doesn't it?
No, not when the delegate count was close enough that "widespread " fraud would not have been required to tip the election. You need to remember how close it seemed when he made that claim.
@metal-brain saidWTF are you talking about? My exact post right up this page said:
No, not Georgia. You said Michigan.
"LMAO! She's making the exact same claims in a lawsuit filed in Georgia."
@no1marauder saidMy post was about MI, not Georgia.
WTF are you talking about? My exact post right up this page said:
"LMAO! She's making the exact same claims in a lawsuit filed in Georgia."
If the claim was not made in MI just admit it.
1 edit
@metal-brain saidI already showed you an article saying the same claims were made in Michigan.
My post was about MI, not Georgia.
If the claim was not made in MI just admit it.
But hey here's the lawsuit itself from Sidney Powell's own website: https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf
Again, read paragraphs 5-7 which appear identical to the ones in the Georgia lawsuit.