@earl-of-trumps saidExactly. Probable cause should be enough for an investigation. Trump had to endure 4 years of an investigation that got started without evidence. Now all of the sudden evidence is important? Then when I prove mail fraud happened it is not enough?
dive,
you cannot have PROOF of that which you want investigated, in order to justify an investigation. That's insane.
Observe the police. A murder occurs. Do they need PROOF as to who committed the murder in order to commence with an investigation? Hell no.
We start out with evidences. We develop a theory. We then investigate to see if the theory can be backed up with proof.
very simple.
Trump has evidence for sure. They just want evidence of more vote fraud than has ever been required by past election fraud investigations.
@Metal-Brain
You keep ragging on about fraud but you KNOW whatever 'fraud' is there was not enough to change the results of the election.
Jebesus, GIVE IT UP, TROLL SOMETHING ELSE, FIND SOME OTHER CONSPIRACY TO RAG ON ABOUT.
TRUMP IS A LOSER. Get over it.
@metal-brain saidOh here we go Russian collusion didn’t happen fantasy post.
Exactly. Probable cause should be enough for an investigation. Trump had to endure 4 years of an investigation that got started without evidence. Now all of the sudden evidence is important? Then when I prove mail fraud happened it is not enough?
Trump has evidence for sure. They just want evidence of more vote fraud than has ever been required by past election fraud investigations.
He had to endure it because he did it, and now that scumbag is pardoning those that were caught doing it, undeniable evidence if it was needed.
@metal-brain saidThat’s not what’s happening. There is simply no evidence of large scale electoral fraud and your lying if you say there is.
Exactly. Probable cause should be enough for an investigation. Trump had to endure 4 years of an investigation that got started without evidence. Now all of the sudden evidence is important? Then when I prove mail fraud happened it is not enough?
Trump has evidence for sure. They just want evidence of more vote fraud than has ever been required by past election fraud investigations.
@metal-brain saidHe has to prove what he’s saying.
Maybe it is because nobody is fact checking him except liars who never prove anything. Try proving it and people may listen. Trolling doesn't do that.
Barr, the counties, the objective observers and everyone else have drawn different conclusions.
You are as mad as a hatter!
@metal-brain saidI watched that embarrassment of a speech the other night.
Maybe it is because nobody is fact checking him except liars who never prove anything. Try proving it and people may listen. Trolling doesn't do that.
But let's set that aside.
Tell me if I have this right...... as a hypothetical case ......
I, a Biden supporter, am approached by you, a Trump supporter with you spouting claims of widespread voter fraud, after which you place the burden of proof on me to discount your claims !!
You get what's wrong with this picture, don't you ??
Is there any part of your intellect that would give you pause to think why I shouldn't just walk away from you laughing my head off ??
Because, analogically speaking, that's what the courts are doing day after day, case after case.
Yet you and the like-minded continue to fill this forum with post after post upon thread after thread with the same drivel.
And all while the the US is heading to another day with 3000 COVID deaths.
(one 9/11 a day).
But that's fake news, isn't it ?
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
@metal-brain saidUhhhh....well actually....the onus is upon trump to prove it. And he's yet to do so.
Maybe it is because nobody is fact checking him except liars who never prove anything. Try proving it and people may listen. Trolling doesn't do that.
Standing in front of cameras, barking....facts do not make.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
@metal-brain saidStill not as bad as Bill Clinton's 8 years of Republican harassment and investigation.
Exactly. Probable cause should be enough for an investigation. Trump had to endure 4 years of an investigation that got started without evidence. Now all of the sudden evidence is important? Then when I prove mail fraud happened it is not enough?
Trump has evidence for sure. They just want evidence of more vote fraud than has ever been required by past election fraud investigations.
What worthless hypocrites they are.
@wolfe63 saidThat Barack Obama had to provide proof that he was an American was laughable.
Uhhhh....well actually....the onus is upon trump to prove it. And he's yet to do so.
Standing in front of cameras, barking....facts do not make.
He should just have told Trump to fack off.
But wait !! That would be unpresidential !!
@sonhouse saidYou don’t really read my posts do you?
@shavixmir
You just figured that out?🙂
I figured out, years ago, that certain right-wing friends on this forum are tinfoil hat crazy, bat💩 mad and mentally challenged.
Most of them American. But some are just like that on certain subjects.
Metal Brain ticks all the crazy boxes on every subject. You want to discuss the Loch Ness Monster voting in the Georgia election from a mountain top in Yeti land... Metal Brain’s your man.
@earl-of-trumps saidIf it's fraud you're looking for, maybe you can direct your curiosity towards the $207 million Trump has raised since he lost the election.
@sonhouse - You keep ragging on about fraud but you KNOW whatever 'fraud' is there was not enough to change the results of the election.
That's not what I am looking for, and I think that's not what MB is looking for - who won the election.
We look for fraud.
Just a thought.