@metal-brain saidI think The Hill should be embarrassed to put this charlatan in front of the cameras. I don't care if he is the president, he's also a fraud, a liar and a con man.
Fact check away.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqbl0L8XlXI
@suzianne saidThis thread is for fact checking, not gaslighting. Everybody here knows how you feel about Trump.
I think The Hill should be embarrassed to put this charlatan in front of the cameras. I don't care if he is the president, he's also a fraud, a liar and a con man.
Your desire to censor the POTUS is only revealing your contempt for free speech. Move to Saudi Arabia. They feel the same way.
@metal-brain saidHow can you fact check something he’s not offering any evidence for? Your talking like an idiot again.
This thread is for fact checking, not gaslighting. Everybody here knows how you feel about Trump.
Your desire to censor the POTUS is only revealing your contempt for free speech. Move to Saudi Arabia. They feel the same way.
Are you aware of the difficulty in proving a negative.
You and Trump have to cite some actual evidence then we can fact check your dishonest statements otherwise your just the guy who claims he’s Elvis.
@kevcvs57 saidEasy. First you actually watch his speech, then you notice a serious claim he made and then you do an internet search. Trump claimed people were not allowed to vote because someone else voted in their name. Here is what I found.
How can you fact check something he’s not offering any evidence for? Your talking like an idiot again.
Are you aware of the difficulty in proving a negative.
You and Trump have to cite some actual evidence then we can fact check your dishonest statements otherwise your just the guy who claims he’s Elvis.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/03/houston-woman-turned-away-from-polls-after-being-told-she-already-voted/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politics/10541347/voters-fraud-turned-away-general-election/
I determine that specific claim to be true.
2 edits
@metal-brain saidI’ve watched the speech snd he doesn’t make any serious claims, it’s all just rambling despotic bile and vitriol about getting his rear end handed to him by “Sleepy Joe” .
Easy. First you actually watch his speech, then you notice a serious claim he made and then you do an internet search. Trump claimed people were not allowed to vote because someone else voted in their name. Here is what I found.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/03/houston-woman-turned-away-from-polls-after-being-told-she-already-voted/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politi ...[text shortened]... s/10541347/voters-fraud-turned-away-general-election/
I determine that specific claim to be true.
“ https://nypost.com/2020/11/03/houston-woman-turned-away-from-polls-after-being-told-she-already-voted/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politics/10541347/voters-fraud-turned-away-general-election/
I determine that specific claim to be true.”
Then you won’t object to proving widespread fraud capable of overturning millions of vote from Biden to Trump will you, so on you go.
Have you heard of the phrase “The exception that proves the rule” . Sorry I don’t know how you’d say it in Russian.
1 edit
@metal-brain saidEDIT: On second thoughts: why do the Courts decide against the Trump Campaign in the overwhelming majority if it is so evident that the Campaign is Right? And we talk About Trump-appointed Judges . So did Trump Appoint B***y liberals to the bench? And Republicans voted for him anyway 😲
Fact check away.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqbl0L8XlXI
This speech is About 45 minutes.
Can you provide the pivotal Facts that proof this thesis brought Forward during the first few minutes:
*Tremendous voter fraud has happened.
Just to be clear I follw here the Definition for tremendous from the merriam webster:
notable by reason of extreme size
Now I define extreme by: "at least of a Magnitude that turns the Outcome of the election". And this is a very modest defintion. Since Trump is atremendous Person himself and it is the "most important speech of his presidency" We should require for extreme: at least so many votes atht Trump, not Biden won the popular vots (and we still are in the small percentages of fraudulanet votes)
@kevcvs57 saidSo you acknowledge voter fraud is happening and your only dispute is how much, right?
I’ve watched the speech snd he doesn’t make any serious claims, it’s all just rambling despotic bile and vitriol about getting his rear end handed to him by “Sleepy Joe” .
“ https://nypost.com/2020/11/03/houston-woman-turned-away-from-polls-after-being-told-she-already-voted/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politics/10541347/voters-fraud-turned-away-general-election/
...[text shortened]... of the phrase “The exception that proves the rule” . Sorry I don’t know how you’d say it in Russian.
@metal-brain saidNo, not without first hand irrefutable evidence. What evidence do you have that the odd one or two complainants aren’t trumptards lying their alt right faces off.
So you acknowledge voter fraud is happening and your only dispute is how much, right?
Do I think that any electoral system is vulnerable to lone wolf fraudsters of any political support base then yes of course it is and it happens in every election everywhere.
The lie Trump is telling ( aided by actors like yourself ) is that this election was special in that the fraud was coordinated and large scale enough to turn the election for Biden by millions of votes.
The example in the NYT article actually highlights why this is not possible. Even if you could forge, sign and deliver enough fraudulent ballots it would be exposed when millions of the actual voters cast their votes.
-Removed-dive,
you cannot have PROOF of that which you want investigated, in order to justify an investigation. That's insane.
Observe the police. A murder occurs. Do they need PROOF as to who committed the murder in order to commence with an investigation? Hell no.
We start out with evidences. We develop a theory. We then investigate to see if the theory can be backed up with proof.
very simple.
@kevcvs57 saidWhat is irrefutable evidence?
No, not without first hand irrefutable evidence. What evidence do you have that the odd one or two complainants aren’t trumptards lying their alt right faces off.
Do I think that any electoral system is vulnerable to lone wolf fraudsters of any political support base then yes of course it is and it happens in every election everywhere.
The lie Trump is telling ( aided by a ...[text shortened]... r enough fraudulent ballots it would be exposed when millions of the actual voters cast their votes.
Now it is not just evidence anymore. Now it is irrefutable.
Just admit no amount of evidence would be enough for you.