Trump wins, SCOTUS: Partial immunity.

Trump wins, SCOTUS: Partial immunity.

Debates

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
94d

@Suzianne said
You, and all the other MAGA democracy-abolitionists are lying here.

That is how the Supreme Court is SUPPOSED to work, but because Trump installed people beholden to him (and, by extension, the sham Republican Party), they are biased ALL DAY LONG, as evidenced by this latest decision. Read the dissenting views. Sotomayor and Jackson are 100% right in their dissenting vi ...[text shortened]... destroy everything we hold dear.

Stop lying to everyone when you claim to honor the Constitution.
Make a note everyone, the littel lady who, along with AOC wants to get rid of the judfges she doesnt like, wants to have a random number of 13 judges. How about 330M judges, Sue,.\.

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
94d

@Suzianne said
You are full of it.

At least it rhymes with 'it'.


And one last time, stop calling me 'feller'. You insult me.
Well, you informed me a few months ago that teh word 'guy' applies to a girl as well as a boy, so,,,, well, ...wht I deduce from that, the way I see that, is that yoy would have to follow up with the most-inconveniient conclusion that a girl can be, or is, a fellow.
Why will you not resopond to this, just in fun? Libs do not have fun, unless they go for a few laughgs at a comedy show, aile G, seat 9.

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
94d

@Suzianne said
What about you?

Would you agree with Trump if he took that $600B (I admit, this is a number you pulled out of your ass) and dropped it into his own personal accounts?

I bet you would, without blinking an eye.
Would you, SuZianne?,. Be brave, SHouse will NEVER own up to the obvious answer, which is that he would be against it. You would be against it, but faeries have no guts to behonest.

How can you let me keep defeating your agrguments (or lack thereof) time after time??

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
94d

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
If Trump sucked out a half tril out of the treasury for that purpose, more power to him, Well Scotus already gave him that power so it is moot now and for sure Trump would NEVER suck money out for ANYONE but himself.
Now that he would be king if reelected, all he has to do to get money is to solicit bribes like Agnew except now it wouldn't be in brown bags to ...[text shortened]... ith a new King with the nuke codes in his pocket.
What a day for rejoicing, and yes that IS sarcasm
I doln't get the full thrust of your post.
Can you be big about it and tell us how you would feel if Trump were presideent and took $600B without authority t spend at his discretion of applying it to loans that are owed by losers?
Can you, Sonouse?

Sonhouse, can you anser this question? Hurry, I have another. Sue let me beat her, don't tell me that you are going to let me beat you, too.

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
94d

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
You really need to actually look at the ruling or listen to those who explained the ruling, you think what, Trump will restrain himself now that he is a potential REAL king, not one he would have had to force on us, it already was given to him, he will really be a king with ZERO accountability which is why people are in panic mode as we speak.

This is not so ...[text shortened]... e WILL do EXACTLY that, like I said, don't wish for something, you will regret your blindness later.
OK, give me a while and I'll shoot you a primer of what happened with SCOTUS. It is not what you think. Think I will keep it a simple thread, after you all cool down.
You all get so confused. Like when Trump said "I am going to stop Roe v Wade, " , people like you took that to mean that he was going to end abortion, he was going to stop abortion. You and your faeries have said that in many ways. Trump has not intention to 'dictate' an end to abortion.
But ever after you realize that, you will continue to hammer it home.

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
94d

@Suzianne said
So you think that by neutering our democracy we are "winning"?

What an idiot.
I missed something...Mott said democracy is being neutered? What is democracy, anyway?? Did he really say that? Mott?

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
94d

@Suzianne said
The dissenting views are all correct.

Look up any of them, I'm not your nanny.
Yes 'all;' correct. Following lock-step, walking instructions. Note that they ALL (3 of them) voted in lockstep. Neither they, nor any lib in this Forum can speak for themselves. Some just spiel out links which are ideas of other people. AmZING.

Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89401
94d

@AverageJoe1 said
Yes 'all;' correct. Following lock-step, walking instructions. Note that they ALL (3 of them) voted in lockstep. Neither they, nor any lib in this Forum can speak for themselves. Some just spiel out links which are ideas of other people. AmZING.
You live in a bubble of moronity.
How come the 3 are in lockstep, but the 6 aren’t?

Why is it the libs don’t speak for themselves, whilst you right-wing crackers repeat each other to the T?

See how fvcking stupid you sound?

Crazy arsed muppet.

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
146003
93d

@Suzianne said
The dissenting views are all correct.

Look up any of them, I'm not your nanny.
no, I want to hear what YOU think is correct about their dissenting views

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
93d

Can some liberal here tell us what they would think if Trump ignored the SCOTUS decision that a president has no such power to do the tuition thing? No matter how you or Marauder (he says no money was involved, just paperwork!!!!) think about this situation, you are oK with Biden doing it. Would you be OK if Trump did it>?

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
93d

@Suzianne said
What about you?

Would you agree with Trump if he took that $600B (I admit, this is a number you pulled out of your ass) and dropped it into his own personal accounts?

I bet you would, without blinking an eye.
Me? I would think that that would be obvious. No president should have such power of such expenditure without congress' approval. Not Biden nor Trump. That is the law. SCOTUS had to tell that to all of us. We get that.
So I have answered your question. Will you answer mine?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
93d

@AverageJoe1
So you now know the mind of your orange Jesus. Tell me how you know that.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
93d

@Mott-The-Hoople
What is abundantly clear is you HATE even the IDEA of democracy much less ACTUAL democracy here in the US.
If you think the SCOTUS decision is to help democracy you are in worse shape mentally than we even knew.
It is a DISASTER for the US, full stop. Biden is now KING BIDEN. Trump will be KING Trump if he is elected by some sinister quirk of fate.
You are seeing the end of the US as a world leader and maybe that is what you want but that is EXACTLY what is happening right now, the ENTIRE WORLD is shuddering because of those traitors on SCOTUS.
And you are too flukking blind AND stupid to see it.

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
93d

@sonhouse said
@Mott-The-Hoople
What is abundantly clear is you HATE even the IDEA of democracy much less ACTUAL democracy here in the US.
If you think the SCOTUS decision is to help democracy you are in worse shape mentally than we even knew.
It is a DISASTER for the US, full stop. Biden is now KING BIDEN. Trump will be KING Trump if he is elected by some sinister quirk of fate.
You a ...[text shortened]... huddering because of those traitors on SCOTUS.
And you are too flukking blind AND stupid to see it.
Why do you not tell us what you would think if Trump implemented the loan forgiveness program or whatever it is called?
You do not find any fault that Biden did it. Would you find fault if Trump would or would have done it?

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
53830
93d

Are you there?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.