@metal-brain saidStop spamming the forum.
https://rumble.com/vwuwd9-ukraine-shuts-down-opposition-news-outlets.html
@metal-brain saidWhether rumble controls content or not is not the issue, irrelevant. Much of the content it posts, and nearly all of the content you link to, is not news reporting. It is not even entertaining. The Onion, now that’s entertaining. What you link to is simply trash.
Rumble does not control content. Criticizing rumble is like criticizing the internet.
Stop being stupid.
@moonbus saidHere are the same videos on youtube.
Whether rumble controls content or not is not the issue, irrelevant. Much of the content it posts, and nearly all of the content you link to, is not news reporting. It is not even entertaining. The Onion, now that’s entertaining. What you link to is simply trash.
Will you now say the same thing about youtube? Why are you trashing rumble for the same videos posted on youtube?
3 edits
@Metal-Brain
Jimmy Dore is a comedian who hosts political satire in talk show format. You do get that, don’t you?
https://jimmydorecomedy.com/
@moonbus saidYes.
@Metal-Brain
Jimmy Dore is a comedian who hosts political satire in talk show format. You do get that, don’t you?
https://jimmydorecomedy.com/
I realize I am getting better news from a pothead comedian making videos in his garage than the pathetic corporate news media. That is how you know you are being fed propaganda.
https://rumble.com/v101dzp-4us-media-pushes-war-crime-propaganda-in-ukraine.html
The United States government has consistently opposed an international court that could hold US military and political leaders to a uniform global standard of justice. You do not hear about that fact on the corp. news media.
Propaganda by omission.
@Metal-Brain
I guess the resurgence of the Ruble fills you with joy since now your payday goes up substantially.
Did I say I INTENSELY hate you and the THOUGHT of people like you?
@sonhouse saidThe United States government has consistently opposed an international court that could hold US military and political leaders to a uniform global standard of justice.
@Metal-Brain
I guess the resurgence of the Ruble fills you with joy since now your payday goes up substantially.
Did I say I INTENSELY hate you and the THOUGHT of people like you?
Do you support that?
@Metal-Brain
And if Dems have their way that will also be a thing of the past and yes I support the US being in that court.
1 edit
@metal-brain saidWhat has this to do with Jimmy Dore? You're bouncing incoherently from one topic to another.
The United States government has consistently opposed an international court that could hold US military and political leaders to a uniform global standard of justice.
Do you support that?
The US govt does not oppose the ICC, it just won't extradite its own officials to a foreign body. It also refused to extradite a member of US embassy staff accused in the hit-and-run killing of a boy in a traffic accident in the UK. The US is not alone in this; other nations also do not submit their govt officials to foreign courts. It is not a policy I agree with, but I understand why. It is to protect US personnel from spurious suits ('spying' in Iran for example).
I support the idea of an ICC in principle, with jurisdiction over all nations and states, including the few areas of the planet not claimed by any state, but only insofar as it actually functions impartially in practise. It is important that human rights violations should be prosecutable regardless of jurisdictions or borders. Unfortunately, the ICC has had some notable failures which taint its credibility; for example, the death of Milosevic while in custody was a disaster.
@moonbus
https://nomadcapitalist.com/global-citizen/countries-arent-part-of-icc/#:~:text=Believe%20it%20or%20not%2C%20the%20three%20first%20world,the%20ICC%2C%20each%20for%20its%20own%20particular%20reasons.
Sorry for the long link but it shows the ICC missing 6 including the US. AND BTW, CLINTON SIGNED THE AGREEMENT but BUSH killed it so take it up with the new GOP ZOMBIES.
@sonhouse saidIf dems had their way the US would have veto power to protect our war criminals.
@Metal-Brain
And if Dems have their way that will also be a thing of the past and yes I support the US being in that court.
Bill Clinton is a war criminal.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/majority-in-greece-wants-clinton-tried-for-war-crimes-over-kosovo-1.189291
@moonbus said"The US govt does not oppose the ICC, it just won't extradite its own officials to a foreign body"
What has this to do with Jimmy Dore? You're bouncing incoherently from one topic to another.
The US govt does not oppose the ICC, it just won't extradite its own officials to a foreign body. It also refused to extradite a member of US embassy staff accused in the hit-and-run killing of a boy in a traffic accident in the UK. The US is not alone in this; other nations also d ...[text shortened]... es which taint its credibility; for example, the death of Milosevic while in custody was a disaster.
That means the US govt does not want to be held accountable for war crimes.
"Unfortunately, the ICC has had some notable failures which taint its credibility; for example, the death of Milosevic while in custody was a disaster"
Milosevic was assassinated by the ICC. They killed him so he would not have a chance to defend himself. He was no more of a war criminal than Abe Lincoln. Milosevic would have defended himself well and it would have been an embarrassment to the ICC. That is why they had to kill him before that happened.