14 Mar 09
Originally posted by RedmikeI'm opposed to this:
There's a proposal that the vets are to use private medical insurance for their treatment, and you seem to be opposed to this.
I'm asking if this is because you oppose private medicine?
"Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki confirmed Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a controversial plan to make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private insurance."
14 Mar 09
Originally posted by Sam The ShamPulling teeth....
I'm opposed to this:
"Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki confirmed Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a controversial plan to make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private insurance."
Is this because you're opposed to private insurance?
14 Mar 09
Originally posted by RedmikeI am not playing your game. You are just being contrary for the sake of argument. There is no way you don't see what the problem is.
OK, so what makes this idea so controversial?
I thought everybody in the US was expected to use private medical insurance?
14 Mar 09
Originally posted by FMFAs a veteran, I can answer that for the most part, yes, I was treated good. There were some inconsistancies, but I'm not going to go there. I will deal with the Veteran's Administration soon enough when I file my claim for disability upon retirement from service.
Were veterans well looked after by Bush/Cheney?