British 'veterans' needing medical treatment have to queue up with the rest of us and may have to wait months for an operation like the rest of us who have to rely on the NHS for which we pay heavily in taxation rather than insurance.
If we want prompt treatment we have to pay for private insurance as well.
1 edit
Originally posted by FabianFnasOK I'll repost the offending line for those who are being intentionally stupid and pretending they don't get it:
You are quite unclear about it all.
You cannot expect got get anny hurrah's for this...
"Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki confirmed Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a controversial plan to make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private insurance."
You honestly are telling me you don't see what's wrong with that?
I knew there'd be some chuckleheads that wouldn't be able to help themselves and support the idea just to be jerks. The usual suspects crawled out of the woodwork.
Originally posted by Sam The ShamThere's nothing wrong with it per se, it's just a problem in the US because health care insurance is so laughably expensive there.
OK I'll repost the offending line for those who are being intentionally stupid and pretending they don't get it:
"Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki confirmed Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a controversial plan to make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private insurance."
You honestly are telling me you don't see what's wrong with that?
1 edit
Originally posted by KazetNagorraNothing wrong with requiring someone injured through military service to pay for medical treatment of their service connected inuries?
There's nothing wrong with it per se, it's just a problem in the US because health care insurance is so laughably expensive there.
I knew that there would be people on this site who would say that. Just wanted to see who they were.
Just amazing.
Originally posted by Sam The ShamI'm sure that's how they do it here, since everyone is forced to be privately insured.
Nothing wrong with requiring someone injured through military service to pay for medical treatment of their service connected inuries?
I knew that there would be people on this site who would say that. Just wanted to see who they were.
Just amazing.
1 edit
Originally posted by Sam The ShamThe wrong in it is that you're not giving respect for you debaters.
OK I'll repost the offending line for those who are being intentionally stupid and pretending they don't get it:
"Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki confirmed Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a controversial plan to make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private insurance."
You honestly are telli s and support the idea just to be jerks. The usual suspects crawled out of the woodwork.
If you call them stupeid, what does that say about yourself?
If you are not clear and call others stupid because they cannot read your mind, and *you* call *them* stupid?
2 edits
Originally posted by FabianFnasYou're right I don't have any respect for them.
The wrong in it is that you're not giving respect for you debaters.
If you call them stupeid, what does that say about yourself?
If you are not clear and call others stupid because they cannot read your mind, and *you* call *them* stupid? [hidden]Thats stupid[/hidden]
De derp de der , wounded vets should pay for treatment, what's wrong with that de derdilly derh.
Originally posted by Sam The ShamThen you deserves no respect either, nor your opinion in this matter...
You're right I don't have any respect for them.
Why are you here anyway? To share opinions with people you don't respect? Like entering a synagogue with a swastica on your back...
Originally posted by FabianFnasThey're not being serious, they're pretending to not understand because they want to be contrary. Like you. Willfull stupidity in order to have an arguing point is contemptuous behaviour and should be treated as such.
Then you deserves no respect either, nor your opinion in this matter...
Why are you here anyway? To share opinions with people you don't respect? Like entering a synagogue with a swastica on your back...
Originally posted by Sam The ShamI think everyone, vets included, should have access to health care, but whether or not that means having private insurance makes little difference. I can live on benefits and still get private health insurance.
They're not being serious, they're pretending to not understand because they want to be contrary. Like you. Willfull stupidity in order to have an arguing point is contemptuous behaviour and should be treated as such.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraOh I just GOT to ask what benefits your are recieving?
I think everyone, vets included, should have access to health care, but whether or not that means having private insurance makes little difference. I can live on benefits and still get private health insurance.
Originally posted by Sam The ShamSo why not being clearer? By being unclear you cannot be properly understood. If you don't understand that, you're stupid.
They're not being serious, they're pretending to not understand because they want to be contrary. Like you. Willfull stupidity in order to have an arguing point is contemptuous behaviour and should be treated as such.
I give you an example: Toisdfliubrty! Did you understand? No? Then *you* are supid! Do you understand now?
Now, be a good boy and apologize. Then be clearer in the future. And behave...