Go back

"US Democrats are struggling to make sense of a socialist surge"

Debates

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
20 Aug 18

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
20 Aug 18
1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I've read opinion pieces making the point that capitalism per se is not the problem, it is capitalism dominated continuous quest for (1) short term profits without (2) a measure of environmental impact and (3) equitable social distribution.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
21 Aug 18

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
Clock
21 Aug 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @js357
I've read opinion pieces making the point that capitalism per se is not the problem, it is capitalism dominated continuous quest for (1) short term profits without (2) a measure of environmental impact and (3) equitable social distribution.
I believe that Capitalism is a byproduct of the free market system.

I'm not an economist but that's what I think.

I also think that the extremes, full blown Communism and cowboy Capitalism, and more alike than we think.
They both strive for extreme concentration of wealth.
The only difference being who holds the keys to that wealth.
The state or private corporations ?

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
21 Aug 18
1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
"For all the deepened divisions of America, many voters occupy the big
prairies of belief in between the populist surge of Trumpworld and those
who think that the answer to modern economic woes is the promise to
make more stuff free. If the extremes of politics feel like the exciting place
to be, however, centrists have to define their own radical agenda with
much greater verve. Outsourcing that will leave centrist Democrats with
little to run on but their pride and legacy – and that never carries the crowd."




Normally I would agree, but at the rate Donald Trump's legal situation is degenerating, I predict Donald Trump and the entire GOP will be so politically weakened by 2020 the Democrats will not need a cohesive and intelligent message to regain power.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
21 Aug 18

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
21 Aug 18
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
An interesting question, but impossible to determine at this point since we won't know the full extent of Russia's ties to Donald Trump, the NRA and by extension, the entire GOP for several more years until the legal process runs it's course. The wheels of justice turn slowly.

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
21 Aug 18

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I do not suggest defining "capitalism per se" using the definition of Laissez Faire capitalism. If we are to define it, I suggest starting with the Wikipedia article which begins "Capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit.[1][2][3] Characteristics central to capitalism include private property, capital accumulation, wage labor, voluntary exchange, a price system, and competitive markets.[4][5]"

Starting this way, owner-specified deductions* from gross income for social equity and environmental costs can be envisioned before profits are calculated.

*Of course this is an academic, perhaps naive, starting point,

lemon lime
itiswhatitis

oLd ScHoOl

Joined
31 May 13
Moves
5577
Clock
22 Aug 18

If free market capitalism was abolished altogether then what (other than forced labor) would be the mechanism for creating the wealth needed for distribution?

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
22 Aug 18

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
22 Aug 18
3 edits

The post that was quoted here has been removed
"I would submit that nothing in capitalism "per se" (in itself) is intrinsically bound with humane values."

Then we need to insist that the cost of furthering humane values be attached, even if "un-intrinsically," to the obligations of those wishing to prosper from investment in a capitalistic system. This is the essence of progressivism in a capitalistic economy.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
22 Aug 18
2 edits

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
22 Aug 18
2 edits

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I believe it is legitimate for a democracy to saddle corporations wishing to operate within it, with financial costs that the corporation may not believe are "intrinsic" to its capitalistic business, such as for example the long-term sustainability of the physical environment of the host .country and measures to protect the work force economically to some degree in case the business goes belly up and exits the country. Of course the state has to realize that it is in competition with other states for the corporation's access to its resources and work force.

This is an admittedly simplistic first-pass approach to progressivism in a global economy.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
22 Aug 18

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89778
Clock
22 Aug 18

Originally posted by @js357
I've read opinion pieces making the point that capitalism per se is not the problem, it is capitalism dominated continuous quest for (1) short term profits without (2) a measure of environmental impact and (3) equitable social distribution.
Well, let’s try lots of different versions of capitalism... see how it pans out?

Oh yeah. We did.
And this is how it pans out.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.