@no1marauder saidNope. Common sense.
So Epidemiology is "bunk, pseudoscience" according to you, or more likely, the crank websites you derive your views from.
Michigan proves you wrong.
Just take the face mask debate for example. My governor tells us to do 3 things to help contain the spread of SARS2. Epidemiology science puts forth articles supposedly proving face masks are effective.
It is proper science to conclude 1 of 3 things was the causative factor? BUNK!!!!!!
Only an idiot would accept epidemiology studies as evidence. It is guesswork being passed as science. It is the conformation bias of choice for morons.
@metal-brain saidThat a sorry internet lunatic makes such nonsensical claims in ever more abusive language does not change the fact that they are devoid of scientific backing and utterly worthless.
Nope. Common sense.
Michigan proves you wrong.
Just take the face mask debate for example. My governor tells us to do 3 things to help contain the spread of SARS2. Epidemiology science puts forth articles supposedly proving face masks are effective.
It is proper science to conclude 1 of 3 things was the causative factor? BUNK!!!!!!
Only an idiot would accept epi ...[text shortened]... evidence. It is guesswork being passed as science. It is the conformation bias of choice for morons.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidIt is proper science to conclude 1 of 3 things was the causative factor?
That a sorry internet lunatic makes such nonsensical claims in ever more abusive language does not change the fact that they are devoid of scientific backing and utterly worthless.
Science recognizes those limitations.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378512207000631
@metal-brain saidJesus, your "common sense" is just stupid talk.
Nope. Common sense.
Michigan proves you wrong.
Just take the face mask debate for example. My governor tells us to do 3 things to help contain the spread of SARS2. Epidemiology science puts forth articles supposedly proving face masks are effective.
It is proper science to conclude 1 of 3 things was the causative factor? BUNK!!!!!!
Only an idiot would accept epi ...[text shortened]... evidence. It is guesswork being passed as science. It is the conformation bias of choice for morons.
Much, perhaps most scientific research esp. in social sciences, involves determining the effect of multiple variables. That you think this is actually impossible "BUNK!" shows rather incredible ignorance.
@metal-brain saidBuffon post 2.0 we are talking about the effects of the vaccine roll out in the uk and umm a trial is not a roll out, they give them different names so as not to confuse halfwits, but I guess they underestimated you huh.
Wrong!
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/25/covid-vaccine-pfizer-begins-trial-on-infants-and-young-kids.html
@no1marauder saidYou are ignorant of science. Furthermore, you are resorting to Lysenkoism. Anything that does not support your interpretation of science must be suppressed by censorship.
Jesus, your "common sense" is just stupid talk.
Much, perhaps most scientific research esp. in social sciences, involves determining the effect of multiple variables. That you think this is actually impossible "BUNK!" shows rather incredible ignorance.
Your whole philosophy is based on an assault on the scientific process. Censorship has no place in science. You embrace Lysenkoism in a shameless suppression of scientific consensus.
You have no controlled randomized trials to support your assertions. It is a huge flaw you are in denial of. You need to honestly confront that huge flaw. Lysenkoism never lasts forever. The truth is always revealed in the end.
@kevcvs57 saidNo we were not. You are attempting to move the goal post. You are a dishonest cad.
Buffon post 2.0 we are talking about the effects of the vaccine roll out in the uk and umm a trial is not a roll out, they give them different names so as not to confuse halfwits, but I guess they underestimated you huh.
@no1marauder saidYou are making up fictional characters to attack. The only lunatic is you.
That a sorry internet lunatic makes such nonsensical claims in ever more abusive language does not change the fact that they are devoid of scientific backing and utterly worthless.
Facebook says its “fact-checks” aren’t statements of fact at all, but merely protected “opinions,” and that Facebook is merely labelling CHD’s content as “potentially” misleading.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/federal-government-facebook-censor-chd-lawsuit/
In other words, their fact checkers were wrong. This is a good example of Lysenkoism out of control. It is why no1 is so brainwashed by propaganda. He thinks fact checkers are honest. Even facebook admits they are merely opinions, but is that what they want people to think? Of course not. If they did they would call them what they are, opinion pieces.
1 edit
@metal-brain said“ @metal-brain said
No we were not. You are attempting to move the goal post. You are a dishonest cad.
Vaccine passports?
It makes no sense.
There is no evidence mRNA vaccines prevent the spread of SARS2, yet people are being led to believe that by the corporate news media in many different countries.
This also makes talk of herd immunity from vaccines absurd nonsense. Why are leftists embracing fascism that fails the test of common sense logic?
Kevcvs57 said
Hahaha I guess the UKs dramatic drop in covid cases and deaths had nothing to do with our massive vaccination programme.
There’s only one Putin lover fascist in this thread MB and it just happens to be you.
What’s up Ivan getting a bit worried about the west’s ability to bounce back from covid with the use of vaccines 😂😂”
Imagine that a professional conspiracy troll telling bare faced lies on social media.
@Metal-Brain
And OF COURSE you move the goalpost yet again.
They are dying less in nursing homes not because the most effected are dead but because the FUKKING VACCINE WORKS and the charts show that clearly, deaths in nursing homes are down to almost ZERO and not because the less healthy have died.
ALL old folks can statistically speaking are in deep doo doo if they get Covid.
Now, the vaccine works and that segment of our population is much better off now.
But of course that doesn't jive with your twisted POV.
@sonhouse saidThat is because the unhealthy people are already dead. How many case numbers are there? Why did you omit that?
@Metal-Brain
And OF COURSE you move the goalpost yet again.
They are dying less in nursing homes not because the most effected are dead but because the FUKKING VACCINE WORKS and the charts show that clearly, deaths in nursing homes are down to almost ZERO and not because the less healthy have died.
ALL old folks can statistically speaking are in deep doo doo if they g ...[text shortened]... t of our population is much better off now.
But of course that doesn't jive with your twisted POV.