2 edits
Originally posted by generalissimoThank you for laying your intellectual cards on the table.
indeed, a slap on the wrist would have been sufficient. [...] in what way is he "not a danger to society"? [...] well, the facts suggest the system is clearly not working considering criminals often get a mild punishment for hideous crimes, but if FMF says it is then it must be true.
Originally posted by FMFIt now transpires that Venables has been rejailed for drug abuse and repeated acts of violence. No threat to society? It is thanks to woolly-minded cranks like you that so many persons in the UK are killed by prematurely released criminal pyschopaths each year.
Thank you for laying your intellectual cards on the table.
Originally posted by Leon AlvaradoHis parole has been rescinded and he has been taken back into custody. Any "threat to society" that his recent behaviour may have posed has thus been negated. Thumbs up to the hard pressed authorities. The system seems to be working.
It now transpires that Venables has been rejailed for drug abuse and repeated acts of violence. No threat to society?
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 23315
Originally posted by zeeblebothave you ever made a first post in a thread without adding a link to a use story and/or a wiki page?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/03/amber.dubois.chelsea.king/
The mother of missing teen Amber DuBois says she knew that registered sex offender John Gardner lived nearby.
Originally posted by Leon AlvaradoHe was judged - by a team of psychiatrists infinitly better placed to pass comment on anyone's mental health and relative risk - to no longer be a danger to society at the time of his release. Probation services have now found that he has not, in the fullness of time since his release, readjusted as much as was hoped. He has therefore been returned to prison.
It now transpires that Venables has been rejailed for drug abuse and repeated acts of violence. No threat to society? It is thanks to woolly-minded cranks like you that so many persons in the UK are killed by prematurely released criminal pyschopaths each year.
In any event, no such thing as you suggest has 'transpired'. You are simply parrotting tabloid speculation as if it were fact. Shame on you, shame on your squalid ignorance and credulous bile. The reasons for his removal from society have still not been made public, in no small part so as not to prejudice the parole board hearing that will determine whether his recall is justified.
How many "persons in the UK are killed by prematurely released criminal pyschopaths each year"? You say 'so many' - have you a figure you'd like to share.
It is thanks to ignorant, hateful mouthpieces of tabloid gutter-journalism like you that it is difficult in this country to have anything like a sensible debate on penal policy.
Originally posted by Leon AlvaradoHe was judged - by a team of psychiatrists infinitly better placed to pass comment on anyone's mental health and relative risk - to no longer be a danger to society at the time of his release. Probation services have now found that he has not, in the fullness of time since his release, readjusted as much as was hoped. He has therefore been returned to prison.
It now transpires that Venables has been rejailed for drug abuse and repeated acts of violence. No threat to society? It is thanks to woolly-minded cranks like you that so many persons in the UK are killed by prematurely released criminal pyschopaths each year.
In any event, no such thing as you suggest has 'transpired'. You are simply parrotting tabloid speculation as if it were fact. Shame on you, shame on your squalid ignorance and credulous bile. The reasons for his removal from society have still not been made public, in no small part so as not to prejudice the parole board hearing that will determine whether his recall is justified.
How many "persons in the UK are killed by prematurely released criminal pyschopaths each year"? You say 'so many' - have you a figure you'd like to share.
It is thanks to ignorant, hateful mouthpieces of tabloid gutter-journalism like you that it is difficult in this country to have anything like a sensible debate on penal policy.
Originally posted by FMFwth!?! are these your own words, FMF? you should at least provide a link!
He was judged - by a team of psychiatrists infinitly better placed to pass comment on anyone's mental health and relative risk - to no longer be a danger to society at the time of his release. Probation services have now found that he has not, in the fullness of time since his release, readjusted as much as was hoped. He has therefore been returned to prison.
...[text shortened]... it is difficult in this country to have anything like a sensible debate on penal policy.
1 edit
Originally posted by generalissimoNo. It was my way of avoiding mention of your plastic debating pants. But now you have forced my hand, and I have. My word you're a tough little debater.
Im guessing thats your way of saying "ok, I'll retreat now before I embarass myself even more"