Originally posted by phil3000Insisting that a 10 year old child MUST do 20 years in prison because he is "an evil specimen" is, in my book, makes you unsuitable for any involvement in changing the criminal code - same goes for the entire editorial boards of The Sun and The Daily Mail - but, on the other hand, I think the suggestion that a 10 year old child MUST do 20 years in prison because he is "an evil specimen" would make for a valid and potentially interesting topic on the Spirituality Forum. You know, the sheer evil of evil children... the sin of attempting rehabilitation... don't tamper with evil Satan's work... etc.
Why! ,of cause i will .
Originally posted by FMFI think the "proof is in the pudding " my friend !!
Insisting that a 10 year old child MUST do 20 years in prison because he is "an evil specimen" is, in my book, makes you unsuitable for any involvement in changing the criminal code - same goes for the entire editorial boards of The Sun and The Daily Mail - but, on the other hand, I think the suggestion that a 10 year old child MUST do 20 years in prison because ...[text shortened]... ren... the sin of attempting rehabilitation... don't tamper with evil Satan's work... etc.
No mention of Satan from me , just rotten apples .