16 Jun '18 07:21>
Comey claimed that he did not know Anthony Weiner was Huma Abedin's husband. Doesn't Comey watch the news?
How could he not know?
How could he not know?
Originally posted by @metal-brainYes. Lots of people believe him. But they haven't always believed him. They wanted him waterboarded, hanged, and burned as a liar and a traitor, back when he opened that investigation against Hillary. But ever since he decided to exonerate her without even so much as interviewing her--they started trusting him again and now they think he is an innocent, honest, angel.
“I don’t know that I knew that [Weiner] was married to Huma Abedin at the time,” Comey told the IG."
http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/14/comey-abedin-weiner-ig-report/
I don't know that I knew? Does anybody believe that hack?
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyYou do realize that Hillary was interviewed by FBI agents for 4 hours, don't you?
Yes. Lots of people believe him. But they haven't always believed him. They wanted him waterboarded, hanged, and burned as a liar and a traitor, back when he opened that investigation against Hillary. But ever since he decided to exonerate her without even so much as interviewing her--they started trusting him again and now they think he is an innocent, honest, angel.
Originally posted by @no1marauderLOL, you do realize he said she would not be charged, before 17 interviews had even taken place, including Hillary's which was 2 months later?
You do realize that Hillary was interviewed by FBI agents for 4 hours, don't you?
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyYou are misinformed, as usual. No final decision was made before the HRC interview; if she had lied or made incriminating statements she would have been charged.
LOL, you do realize he said she would not be charged, before 17 interviews had even taken place, including Hillary's which was 2 months later?
Originally posted by @no1marauderI'm not misinformed at all. I know the timeline.
You are misinformed, as usual. No final decision was made before the HRC interview; if she had lied or made incriminating statements she would have been charged.
The IG report makes clear what virtually every legal commentator not on the right wing fringe was saying before last July; there were no grounds to charge her with any criminal acts.
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyYou didn't even know that criminal statutes require "intent", so your "knowledge" is pretty suspect. You can read the IGs report if you want to; it supports my statement.
I'm not misinformed at all. I know the timeline.
"Every legal commentator not on the right wing"
In other words Chris Matthews said Hillary was innocent. Very impressive.
Originally posted by @no1marauderThe criminal statutes require either intent, or gross negligence. That latter in this case is so obvious as to be irrefutable. Since I assume (hesitantly) that you know the facts of the case, I need say no more.
You didn't even know that criminal statutes require "intent", so your "knowledge" is pretty suspect. You can read the IGs report if you want to; it supports my statement.
Like you don't know what is in the criminal law, you apparently don't know there are a lot of sources for legal commentary on the net. That's unfortunate for you,
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyI already fully covered these issues two years ago in the "No indictment!" thread and feel no need to rediscover the wheel. The IG's report covers the statute most right wingers think HRC should have been charged with extensively. Here's what it says:
The criminal statutes require either intent, or gross negligence. That latter in this case is so obvious as to be irrefutable. Since I assume (hesitantly) that you know the facts of the case, I need say no more.
Originally posted by @no1marauderLOL!
You do realize that Hillary was interviewed by FBI agents for 4 hours, don't you?
I don't find it hard to believe that Comey didn't know that Huma was married to Weiner; maybe his subscription to the NY Post lapsed or maybe he had slightly more important things to worry about as FBI director.
Originally posted by @metal-brainSure that's possible, sometimes it is hard to say when you knew something.
LOL!
If Comey didn't know that he knew Huma was Weiner's wife does that mean that Comey might have known at the time but doesn't remember that he knew?
Ya know? 😀
Originally posted by @no1marauderI don't think you realize just how stupid you sound defending these swamp creatures.
Sure that's possible, sometimes it is hard to say when you knew something.
If someone asked me whether I knew on January 1st, 2018 Aaron Rodgers was dating Danica Patrick, I'd have a hard time answering. I know it now but I'm not sure if I knew it then.
Originally posted by @metal-brainDunno, but Obama said he heard it on the 6 o'clock news like everyone else.
Comey claimed that he did not know Anthony Weiner was Huma Abedin's husband. Doesn't Comey watch the news?
How could he not know?
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleMarauder would fit in well as one of these swamp creatures, as if anyone gives a damn about his clever lawyer double speak as making a difference regarding the obvious truth.
I don't think you realize just how stupid you sound defending these swamp creatures.