@no1marauder said
Obviously you've read very little about Watergate to come to the bizarre conclusions you have.
No one would actually dispute that crimes were committed at the Watergate...
But here is a link to an excellent story concerning Watergate:
https://www.counterpunch.org/2001/01/07/the-nixon-story-you-never-heard/
You're aware of the theory, though, that the real reason for the break in was a guy trying to uncover information concerning whether his wife was acting as a high level prostitute in Washington circles, right?
This is a very interesting post that deals with this:
https://visupview.blogspot.com/2016/06/the-office-of-security-tale-of-sex_18.html
The real attraction, though, is reading about the levels of corruption and the general depravity of the deep state way back when.
It really was always this way -- going back to Franklin. One can imagine that it has generally been this way in most administrations & courts throughout history. The amount of things that are actually a poop festival at the bottom line is pretty surprising.
And if you understand this, then it really isn't such a big deal to read about the prosecutors indicting a ham sandwich and Flynn over anything & everything. It's the way of the world, my dear friend.