16 May '22 11:49>
https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/apr/14/ask-politifact-whats-ukraines-history-trying-join-/
Ukraine expressed in interest in joining NATO as early as 2002 but NATO never provided any real indication that this could be a possibility. Ukraine applied to be part of their "action plan" to put them on a path to joining NATO which was never approved.
It seems that despite Ukraine's interest in NATO, this was never a realistic possibility.
Given that, couldn't we say that Russia's reasons for invading Ukraine are actually flawed? And I'm not talking about whether the invasion was justified; I mean that Russia's rationale was fundamentally flawed.
A few posters have rightly pointed out that NATO has continued expanding, despite assurances given that would not; but in the case of Ukraine, who has expressed interest for a long time in NATO membership without any progress, using the point that Russia was "provoked" into invading doesn't hold up.
Thoughts?
Ukraine expressed in interest in joining NATO as early as 2002 but NATO never provided any real indication that this could be a possibility. Ukraine applied to be part of their "action plan" to put them on a path to joining NATO which was never approved.
It seems that despite Ukraine's interest in NATO, this was never a realistic possibility.
Given that, couldn't we say that Russia's reasons for invading Ukraine are actually flawed? And I'm not talking about whether the invasion was justified; I mean that Russia's rationale was fundamentally flawed.
A few posters have rightly pointed out that NATO has continued expanding, despite assurances given that would not; but in the case of Ukraine, who has expressed interest for a long time in NATO membership without any progress, using the point that Russia was "provoked" into invading doesn't hold up.
Thoughts?