@no1marauder saidBut we know what is really about, don’t we Marauder. You can’t kid a kidder.
I call BS.
I said over a month ago:
"I think any CEO of a corporation who falsely filed paperwork claiming reimbursement for a hush money payment was a legitimate business cost i.e. "legal expenses" and was caught doing so would be prosecuted in NY."
In Marchan's February decision he pointed out that "the People note that their Office has brought "approximately ...[text shortened]... t entitled to commit criminal offenses without being prosecuted just because he's a hack politician.
It is BS that you will not admit it. You Marxists will get what you ask for, you are too devious and tenacious for us to fight you off.
I have 1000 shares NVDA and much more in children’s names. Assuming you don’t take it from them , ,,,,,oh never mind. You will.
How many of those 476 similar cases were manipulated from misdemeanors to felony, and how much work and expense did you put into those cases?.. Right. So why were they treated a bit lighter than Trump’s? Right. You see now? You can’t kid a kidder.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou'd not have a problem with Trump's prosecutions for falsifying business records as long as they were filed as misdemeanors not felonies?
But we know what is really about, don’t we Marauder. You can’t kid a kidder.
It is BS that you will not admit it. You Marxists will get what you ask for, you are too devious and tenacious for us to fight you off.
I have 1000 shares NVDA and much more in children’s names. Assuming you don’t take it from them , ,,,,,oh never mind. You will.
How many of those 476 ...[text shortened]... So why were they treated a bit lighter than Trump’s? Right. You see now? You can’t kid a kidder.
Seems ticky tacky.
@wildgrass
He would bitch about those minor misdemeanors too, don't worry. His orange anti Christ is above the law and that is the bottom line for him.
@wildgrass saidThere is no evidence of the falsification of Business records by Trump. Funny you say that, another person has said that on the Forum.
You'd not have a problem with Trump's prosecutions for falsifying business records as long as they were filed as misdemeanors not felonies?
Seems ticky tacky.
@no1marauder saidCould you direct us to evidence of the falsification by Trump of business records?
I call BS.
I said over a month ago:
"I think any CEO of a corporation who falsely filed paperwork claiming reimbursement for a hush money payment was a legitimate business cost i.e. "legal expenses" and was caught doing so would be prosecuted in NY."
In Marchan's February decision he pointed out that "the People note that their Office has brought "approximately ...[text shortened]... t entitled to commit criminal offenses without being prosecuted just because he's a hack politician.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidHow about 10 checks for $35,000 apiece signed by him to Cohen which state they were for a "retainer" when there was no retainer agreement (the testimony and documents showed they were reimbursements + added amounts to cover anticipated taxes + a bonus)?
Could you direct us to evidence of the falsification by Trump of business records?
@no1marauder saidYes, but is there evidence that Trump falsified the records. Evidence.
How about 10 checks for $35,000 apiece signed by him to Cohen which state they were for a "retainer" when there was no retainer agreement (the testimony and documents showed they were reimbursements + added amounts to cover anticipated taxes + a bonus)?
@AverageJoe1 saidOm ok. But why do you argue that the other hundreds of cases of falsifying business records were treated more leniently?
There is no evidence of the falsification of Business records by Trump. Funny you say that, another person has said that on the Forum.
At least now you admit you understand the charge? Otherwise why do you pretend to know if there's evidence?
@wildgrass saidUnderstand the charge!?? UH, here is what overrides that. The violation of the 5th amendment by the judge in denying the defendant adequate notice to what the charges are. Are you hearing me? This is a fact.
Om ok. But why do you argue that the other hundreds of cases of falsifying business records were treated more leniently?
At least now you admit you understand the charge? Otherwise why do you pretend to know if there's evidence?
This is one of the many reversible errors. That is a big one.
ANd don't get me started abut similar cases, this one is big enough. Just like a lib, you want me to comment on other cases when we don't know any extenuating circumstances. Why don't you, as a research afficienado, tell us any of those cases where they applied the magical trick where a misdemeanor became a felony? If you find one similar to Trump's falsification case, flipped from misdemeanor to felony, etc, of a defendant with no criminal record and no violence, please tell us what sentence they received.
@AverageJoe1 saidEvery single person charged with NY Penal Law section 175.10 had a misdemeanor upgraded to a felony due to their alleged intent to commit another crime. Trump is being treated no differently than those defendants.
Understand the charge!?? UH, here is what overrides that. The violation of the 5th amendment by the judge in denying the defendant adequate notice to what the charges are. Are you hearing me? This is a fact.
This is one of the many reversible errors. That is a big one.
ANd don't get me started abut similar cases, this one is big enough. Just like a lib, you wan ...[text shortened]... of a defendant with no criminal record and no violence, please tell us what sentence they received.
The indictment is over a year old and the prosecutors specified the object crimes that elevate the misdemeanor to a felony last year in court filings. Just because the biased morons at Fox News won't tell you this doesn't make it any less true. Trump has had ample notice of the charges against him; his lawyers filed for dismissal of them more than 6 months ago!
@no1marauder saidSince you are our research impressario, tell us the sentences of those who were found guilty.....those that had no criminal convictions and committed no violence.
Every single person charged with NY Penal Law section 175.10 had a misdemeanor upgraded to a felony due to their alleged intent to commit another crime. Trump is being treated no differently than those defendants.
The indictment is over a year old and the prosecutors specified the object crimes that elevate the misdemeanor to a felony last year in court filings. Just b ...[text shortened]... e notice of the charges against him; his lawyers filed for dismissal of them more than 6 months ago!
Yes, I am fishing to show that y'all are giving Donald hell. For 8 years, the man ha fought off you and your fellow hyenas at every turn.....and won.
If he wins this one, I am going to do something crazy happy and bother you boys like never before. And at the same time, you will be successful under his administration. Never ending conflict for libs and all those other monikers you all bear.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidHe hasn't been convicted yet.
Since you are our research impressario, tell us the sentences of those who were found guilty.....those that had no criminal convictions and committed no violence.
Yes, I am fishing to show that y'all are giving Donald hell. For 8 years, the man ha fought off you and your fellow hyenas at every turn.....and won.
If he wins this one, I am going to do something craz ...[text shortened]... der his administration. Never ending conflict for libs and all those other monikers you all bear.
If he is, we'll see what sentence the prosecutor seeks and hear why. It's premature to discuss sentencing before a verdict (as Trump's lawyer was told on Tuesday).
@no1marauder saidYes, so Will you tell us after the verdict, if he is sentenced in anyway, if that has ever happened to someone in the same situation that he is in with regard to non-violence, and never having been judged a criminal? That will be quick enough.
He hasn't been convicted yet.
If he is, we'll see what sentence the prosecutor seeks and hear why. It's premature to discuss sentencing before a verdict (as Trump's lawyer was told on Tuesday).
1 edit
@no1marauder saidOK, so you will tell us about a similar case after this trials over. That will be quick enough.
He hasn't been convicted yet.
If he is, we'll see what sentence the prosecutor seeks and hear why. It's premature to discuss sentencing before a verdict (as Trump's lawyer was told on Tuesday).