Go back
Well, well,… No crime?

Well, well,… No crime?

Debates


@AverageJoe1
It looks like you are a wee bit behind times, 34 guilty felony counts.
Maybe you can figure the crimes now.
Of course you will just move the goal post and bypass what you said several times now, 'I won't vote for Trump if he is convicted of a crime'
Well now he is convicted of THIRTY FOUR separate felonies.
Let's see your goalpost move......


@AverageJoe1 said
Understand the charge!?? UH, here is what overrides that. The violation of the 5th amendment by the judge in denying the defendant adequate notice to what the charges are. Are you hearing me? This is a fact.
This is one of the many reversible errors. That is a big one.
ANd don't get me started abut similar cases, this one is big enough. Just like a lib, you wan ...[text shortened]... of a defendant with no criminal record and no violence, please tell us what sentence they received.
you were on trial and the jury went into deliberations to determine your verdict and you said...

"I don't even know what the charges are?"

Do you think you are competent enough to be the President of the United States?


@no1marauder said
Step 1: Google "NY Penal Law 175.10".

Step 2: Read it.

We can go from there.
google US constitution…we will end it there!


@Mott-The-Hoople said
google US constitution…we will end it there!
I'm not gonna Google your toilet paper.


@AverageJoe1 said
There is no evidence of the falsification of Business records by Trump. Funny you say that, another person has said that on the Forum.
Did we watch the same trial?


@AverageJoe1
You are really in fringe land if you think SCOTUS will think the judge acted improperly when it was the frigging JURY who said guilty 34 times over.
You are a hypocrite for saying you would not vote for Trump if he was convicted of a crime and here we are, 34 times over felony after felony and all you can do is bitch about the judge who bent over backwards to NOT put a petulant child Trump in jail for violation after violation of gag orders, like Trump DISPICABLE attack on the judges daughter. Try justifying that bit of shuxt


@Suzianne said
I'm not gonna Google your toilet paper.
my god! I cant believe you said that


@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
You are really in fringe land if you think SCOTUS will think the judge acted improperly when it was the frigging JURY who said guilty 34 times over.
You are a hypocrite for saying you would not vote for Trump if he was convicted of a crime and here we are, 34 times over felony after felony and all you can do is bitch about the judge who bent over backwards to ...[text shortened]... of gag orders, like Trump DISPICABLE attack on the judges daughter. Try justifying that bit of shuxt
you are a complete idiot


@Mott-The-Hoople
Oh, THAT really won you the argument. It must be hard to think and incredibly smelly with your head so far up Trump's ass.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.