What happened to the female outrage?

@Cliff-Mashburn said
Like what, exactly?

On Carly Fiorina

"Look at that face. Would anybody vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president? I mean, she's a woman, and I'm not supposed to say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious?" [Sept. 9, 2015]

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
On Carly Fiorina

"Look at that face. Would anybody vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president? I mean, she's a woman, and I'm not supposed to say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious?" [Sept. 9, 2015]

That's about a specific person, not women in general. The claim was he spoke harshly about WOMEN.
Try to keep up with the conversation.

@Cliff-Mashburn said
That's about a specific person, not women in general. The claim was he spoke harshly about WOMEN.
Try to keep up with the conversation.

The only women he did NOT talk shyyytt about are those who previously signed the loyalty paper. THOSE women he likes, nobody else.

Which coincidently is how he plans to run his government. Sign this fealty and total loyalty agreement and we are friends, otherwise we are enemies.
That his his MO, always was and always will be. With Trump it is US VS THEM and no other choice which explains why he wants to kill the FCC broadcast license of any TV network broadcasting ANY kind of criticism of Trump or his policies.
Which is the primary tactic of dictators around the world.
Don't EVEN deny it, he said as much a dozen times on TV heard by millions of people, also a tactic of bullying, the only way he runs.

@sonhouse said
The only women he did NOT talk shyyytt about are those who previously signed the loyalty paper. THOSE women he likes, nobody else.

That's a load of crap.
Give us a specific example of him saying something derogatory about women in general or STFU.

@shavixmir said
What this shows is the effect of propaganda on the population.

You couple the constant messaging about poverty, blaming immigration, etc. with Maslow’s pyramid, and what do you think you get?

If people think they are poor, that things cannot get better under a current regime, and a new regime promises them houses and jobs and makes clear there’s a small group to blame ...[text shortened]... omen’s heads too.

And that is why it seems they don’t care about the rights to their own bodies.

the population is tired of you sex freaks

@Mott-The-Hoople said
the population is tired of you sex freaks

Your momma ain’t.

@Cliff-Mashburn said
That's about a specific person, not women in general. The claim was he spoke harshly about WOMEN.
Try to keep up with the conversation.

If you try to keep up with the human species.

@sh76 said
In what way are his stances on women's healthcare, and reproductive rights especially harsh?

Yes, he appointed the SCOTUS Justices who decided Dobbs, but beyond that, I don't think he has any plans to do anything beyond leaving the issue to the states.

And what "women's healthcare" issues are you referring to?

You do know Project 2025 is GOING to be invoked, right? Evidence of that is right in front of our faces, the appointment of the AUTHOR of Project 2025, Vought to Budget director.
Trump keeps saying he doesn't know a 'thing' about project 2025 but as usual that is a barefaced lie. Besides that, Vance wrote the preface for the book written about it by Vought.
That should be a clue right there.
That means they will be pushing for a total 50 state no exception ban and there will BE no safe states so it would require folks with money and a passport to go to Canada or Mexico or some such place to get the D&C they might require with so far has killed at least 3 women because of the draconian laws in Texas and Georgia.
Dylan said 'how many deaths does it take till we know too many people have died' He said that over a half century ago and that phrase is all the more poignant today.

@sh76 said
You said "women's healthcare and reproductive rights"

That implies you're talking about two separate things. Your explanation confirms that you meant one thing: abortion.

We can debate abortion until the cows come home (and we likely will), but casting the abortion debate as being about "women's healthcare" is sleight of hand, just as the right uses sleight of hand when they cast the abortion discussion as "protecting the lives of babies."

Men's healthcare is not the default, and it shouldn't be.

Even abortion itself is women's healthcare. Just because it doesn't involve men doesn't make it not women's healthcare.