... to impeaching Xiden?
This committee has been at it for 6 months. I think they only held 2 public hearings. They interviewed hunter and all his henchmen. Republicans were easily tricked by false info from foreign agents and convicted conmen. They showed graphic pornography on camera. They produced nothing of substance.
And now radio silence. Unable to suggest any crimes or misdemeanors connected to biden. No evidence, no deposition summary, no indication of future direction.
267d
@wildgrass saidIt is truly amazing. We all know there will be no 'jail time'. that they will ultimately be let go.
... to impeaching Xiden?
This committee has been at it for 6 months. I think they only held 2 public hearings. They interviewed hunter and all his henchmen. Republicans were easily tricked by false info from foreign agents and convicted conmen. They showed graphic pornography on camera. They produced nothing of substance.
And now radio silence. Unable to suggest any c ...[text shortened]... demeanors connected to biden. No evidence, no deposition summary, no indication of future direction.
I do take exception to there being 'no evidence'. 160 SARs, millions (for no work?!!?) flowing in from our enemies, 21 bank accounts, etc. is evidence. Can you tell us in all seriousness that there is no evidence of corruption?
267d
@averagejoe1 saidIs that the evidence that came from a Russian spy?
It is truly amazing. We all know there will be no 'jail time'. that they will ultimately be let go.
I do take exception to there being 'no evidence'. 160 SARs, millions (for no work?!!?) flowing in from our enemies, 21 bank accounts, etc. is evidence. Can you tell us in all seriousness that there is no evidence of corruption?
This committee didn't mention any of that. What I can tell, all they discussed in committee over this 6 months was a car loan repayment and pictures of Hunters genitalia.
@wildgrass saidYeah they would not let us in the room. So you didn't see the millions, the chinee, the SARs, 21 bank accounts? You should watch Fox and listen to Breitbart.
Is that the evidence that came from a Russian spy?
This committee didn't mention any of that. What I can tell, all they discussed in committee over this 6 months was a car loan repayment and pictures of Hunters genitalia.
267d
@averagejoe1 saidDo you wonder why they only discuss on Breitbart and not in official capacity under oath?
Yeah they would not let us in the room. So you didn't see the millions, the chinee, the SARs, 21 bank accounts? You should watch Fox and listen to Breitbart.
Maybe because it's all BS?
266d
@sonhouse saidHopefully when they write a documentary they'll include the part of impeachment inquiry hearing when a Republican lawmaker said that Hunter Biden had "no balls" because he didn't want to do a private deposition (while he was sitting right in front of her and agreed to answer her questions). Then not 20 minutes later, another Republican lawmaker submitted a photo of Hunter Biden's genitalia (balls and all) to the whole group.
@wildgrass
Nah, could that be? All BS? Everyone knows that Russian spy is really a double spy?
266d
@AverageJoe1
Lets see YOUR proof of Biden's corruption. Even the repub pet lawyer said there was nothing there. And your buddy bobo has disappeared, back to Russia no doubt reporting to Putin how his stupid 'testimony' went.
266d
@wildgrass saidBreitbart are conservative pundits. You have a slew of your kind on different platforms, one is a condescending person named Michaelangelo, I kid you not. So what is your problem? And there 'discussions', they come from both our guys and michaelllllaaaaaaaannnngggelo, speaking there minds**.
Do you wonder why they only discuss on Breitbart and not in official capacity under oath?
Maybe because it's all BS?
Sp, please tell Sueperson and me what you mean about official capacity under oath?
***We speak about freedom and liberty, Michaelllaaaaanngelo speaks about getting the stuff of other people.
266d
@sonhouse saidTo be fair, they are doing their best to show the SARs and bank accounts and millions as being corruption. It smells, it walks, it talks, like corruption.
@AverageJoe1
Lets see YOUR proof of Biden's corruption. Even the repub pet lawyer said there was nothing there. And your buddy bobo has disappeared, back to Russia no doubt reporting to Putin how his stupid 'testimony' went.
How bout YOU tell us why all the millions were given to the Bidens. We DO have that proof, that they got it. It is apparently not enough, dagnab it.
266d
@averagejoe1 saidI mean of course that if you're under legal obligation to tell the truth, and you say something different than what you said on Breitbart, which version of the story should you believe?
Breitbart are conservative pundits. You have a slew of your kind on different platforms, one is a condescending person named Michaelangelo, I kid you not. So what is your problem? And there 'discussions', they come from both our guys and michaelllllaaaaaaaannnngggelo, speaking there minds**.
Sp, please tell Sueperson and me what you mean about official capacity ...[text shortened]... peak about freedom and liberty, Michaelllaaaaanngelo speaks about getting the stuff of other people.
266d
@wildgrass saidYou refer to 'they' in previous post, being under oath. Is that the committee, or Bobolinski, or whom? So, you are saying that they, who are under oath, change their stories when they are interviewed on Breitbart. I don't get it.
I mean of course that if you're under legal obligation to tell the truth, and you say something different than what you said on Breitbart, which version of the story should you believe?
265d
@averagejoe1 said“ You should watch Fox and listen to Breitbart.”
Yeah they would not let us in the room. So you didn't see the millions, the chinee, the SARs, 21 bank accounts? You should watch Fox and listen to Breitbart.
Hahaha or you could just have a lobotomy
@wildgrass saidThe case was never more than tit-for-tat. Democrats impeached Trump, so the Republican'ts retaliated. It never had anything to do with actual evidence. It was merely political harassment.
... to impeaching Xiden?
This committee has been at it for 6 months. I think they only held 2 public hearings. They interviewed hunter and all his henchmen. Republicans were easily tricked by false info from foreign agents and convicted conmen. They showed graphic pornography on camera. They produced nothing of substance.
And now radio silence. Unable to suggest any c ...[text shortened]... demeanors connected to biden. No evidence, no deposition summary, no indication of future direction.
PS every politician knows well enough, if you poke around long enough, you're bound to turn up some dirt even on Mother Theresa. The only question is, does it rise to the level of "grave crimes and misdemeanours". Republican'ts are loathe to impeach Joe Biden for the few misdemeanours they have so far uncovered because that would set the bar so low that no one else in Congress would keep his seat.
😆