@whodey saidThis hate post was brought to you by the pro-abortion Republican party.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7353967/Did-Jeffrey-Epstein-portrait-Bill-Clinton-blue-dress-red-heels-NYC-mansion.html
Epstein had a painting of Bill Clinton in a blue dress?
Now I realize Bill is untouchable, but at least we know now the truth about him.
LMAO!!!!!!
You know our motto, "We don't just support abortion, we pay for them ourselves".
@lemon-lime saidWhere's the one of Donny?
"It's a painting, for God's sake, not a photo."
Wo, nothing gets past you!
or...
Gee whiz, ya think?
@whodey saidAt a guess I would say paedophiles have things for the same reason you and I.
No, as a matter of fact, I'm pretty sure you wear dresses as well, but why would a pedophile have such a picture of Bill?
It's humorous, it's an investment (if original).
I suspect it may be a political dig as well as the
obvious reference to that blue dress.
Clothed in blue (Democrat) treading on red (Republican) shoes?
1 edit
@whodey saidDo your friends know you might have them painted in a blue dress for your wall.
Yes but why Bill?
Seems like a tight knit group to me.
Does it not occur to you that this is an insult aimed at someone who is anything but part of your ‘tight knit group’ and more like a hate figure.
@earl-of-trumps saidThe artist is a woman.
I wonder about the artist. On the one hand, it's derogatory to a dem which implies he's a repub, but it is dems that are for more the flamboyant prankster.
me confused 😳
Which just shows your general ignorance I guess.
But artists, and most people, are quite capable of
poking fun at politicians from all sides.
confused?
Yes ... I would say that you are.
@whodey saidAs we all know, tightness can be quantified according to the number of paintings of someone in a dress they own.
It appears Bill was tight with Epstein rather than Trump.