Go back
Where did Epstein evidence go?

Where did Epstein evidence go?

Debates

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@KellyJay said
If what is in those files damaged Trump you believe that would not get leaked?
Of course not. He probably has most of his administration working on burying all this as deeply as they can.

You DO realize who is in office now, right? Yeah, the corrupt ones.

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@Mott-The-Hoople said
what part about corrupt FBI do you not get?
Oh, we get it, NOW that it IS corrupt.

Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@wildgrass said
Have you watched the wizard of Oz recently?

Oz: "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain"

Mott the hoople: oh ok. I won't.

Roll credits.
Sounds familiar. 🙂

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@spruce112358 said
The reason is, Biden is a highly moral individual and a patriot who loves his country (Trump is not). Under Biden, the DOJ acted completely independently without interference - as it always should (Trump violates this rule). 😆

As for why the DOJ did not do anything: "... generally law enforcement don't just publish incriminating evidence about people for sh**s and ...[text shortened]... visiting multiple of Epstein's prostitutes), it did not meet their criteria for bringing charges. 😆
Even if true it does not explain why they would bust up a human trafficking ring and only arrest one person.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@Suzianne said
Of course not. He probably has most of his administration working on burying all this as deeply as they can.

You DO realize who is in office now, right? Yeah, the corrupt ones.
Someone you hate

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@spruce112358 said
The reason is, Biden is a highly moral individual and a patriot who loves his country (Trump is not). Under Biden, the DOJ acted completely independently without interference - as it always should (Trump violates this rule). 😆

As for why the DOJ did not do anything: "... generally law enforcement don't just publish incriminating evidence about people for sh**s and ...[text shortened]... visiting multiple of Epstein's prostitutes), it did not meet their criteria for bringing charges. 😆
Wow

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@wildgrass said
Oh ok. Not sure why you made that point though. Did Biden campaign on a promise to release the Epstein files? Was Biden president when Epstein was killed in prison? Does Biden have a decades long friendship with Epstein?

Help me make the connection. I don't get it.
Obviously

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

@wildgrass said
Even if true it does not explain why they would bust up a human trafficking ring and only arrest one person.
They convicted Maxwell, too. 😆

I don't know how many people are needed for a human trafficking ring. At least two, I guess. I don't know where the others went - if there were any.

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@spruce112358 said
They convicted Maxwell, too. 😆

I don't know how many people are needed for a human trafficking ring. At least two, I guess. I don't know where the others went - if there were any.
Federal investigators have stated there were over 1,000 victims, more than 60 of them have spoken out publicly and in depositions have named people who were involved. These names are redacted.

There were at least 5 employees listed in the Epstein indictment, along with a list of "recruiters" who they interacted with. These names also redacted.

Not sure why. Bondi could at least explain that part.

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

@wildgrass said
Federal investigators have stated there were over 1,000 victims, more than 60 of them have spoken out publicly and in depositions have named people who were involved. These names are redacted.

There were at least 5 employees listed in the Epstein indictment, along with a list of "recruiters" who they interacted with. These names also redacted.

Not sure why. Bondi could at least explain that part.
There has to be evidence.

I don't agree with prosecuting people based on hearsay or suspicion, or of releasing names of people who were 'once under investigation' because that could be prejudicial.

🙂

NB. I obviously hold Trump guilty for insurrection and many other crimes and think he deserves the death penalty or exile. But I am not on board with the sexual assault case(s). In the vast majority, I don't think there is enough evidence to pursue sexual assault cases; and given how prejudicial they are (especially to men) I think the vast majority of charges should neither be pursued nor revealed - barring real, physical evidence or some sort.

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@spruce112358 said
There has to be evidence.

I don't agree with prosecuting people based on hearsay or suspicion, or of releasing names of people who were 'once under investigation' because that could be prejudicial.

🙂

NB. I obviously hold Trump guilty for insurrection and many other crimes and think he deserves the death penalty or exile. But I am not on board with the sexual a ...[text shortened]... ty of charges should neither be pursued nor revealed - barring real, physical evidence or some sort.
Pam said there were videos. And there must have been payments made? Combine that with first hand witness testimony and there's a slam dunk case.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-2

@wildgrass said
The FBI busted up what they described as a human trafficking "ring" and then only arrested one person?

Super bizarre.
Agreed.
Super bizarre.

Elon Musk was spot on. Trump is a child molester and is covering it up for self serving reasons. The thing is there are countless child molesters who get away with having sex with children too. Many of them politicians who are being blackmailed to support certain policies they otherwise would not.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@wildgrass

There must be a poll that exists that would tell us how few people believe this is not a coverup. We will never see most of the evidence because it is kiddy porn, but the FBI has that kiddy porn.

I guess the FBI is in the business of blackmailing our politicians with kiddy porn they are sitting on.

edit: Here it is.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/closing-epstein-investigation-unpopular-voters

https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3928

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@Mott-The-Hoople said
what part about corrupt FBI do you not get?
From the link below:

"The 2019 New York Times report exposed how federal prosecutors, led by Alexander Acosta, violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act by failing to notify Epstein’s victims about the deal. A federal judge later ruled this secrecy illegal, but the damage was done. Acosta’s claim that he was told to “back off” because Epstein “belonged to intelligence” only deepens the suspicion that the deal protected not just Epstein but a web of influential figures. The leniency reeks of a system bending over backward to shield the elite."

https://strangesounds.substack.com/p/fbi-buried-epsteins-rape-and-trafficking

It looks like Epstein was a CIA agent. The CIA was complicit in a child sex trafficking ring. Since the FBI has the evidence they are too. Wealthy people like Bill Gates are probably on video doing little girls.

https://people.com/bill-gates-addresses-jeffrey-epstein-friendship-8780614

Epstein did not have any problem with blackmailing Bill Gates.

https://www.wsj.com/finance/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates-affair-russian-bridge-player-8b2022ff

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-2

@Suzianne said
Of course not. He probably has most of his administration working on burying all this as deeply as they can.

You DO realize who is in office now, right? Yeah, the corrupt ones.
Well, before Trump took office, the same evidence was in the hands of Biden’s DOJ. All the things you are clamoring to see were there then, too. Wasn’t it not?