@Metal-Brain saidNobody, fool.
We know it is a coverup. Powerful people are involved and to coverup for them I guess all involved must be covered up. It is a slap in the face to all of the victims since the predators go free.
Trump was likely doing young girls and Epstein had it on film. Now the FBI has it on film so the FBI is in on the coverup. The big question is who is blackmailing Trump with it?
The Republicans have spent the last couple of weeks redacting Trump out of all the files. What did you think the delay was all about?
@Metal-Brain saidIgnorance is not a good character trait.
House Intelligence investigators found the Obama intelligence team was wrong. Here is an excerpt from the link below:
"According to documents declassified this week, Obama’s intelligence team rushed to produce the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), a key pillar of the Trump–Russia probe, despite lacking empirical evidence. The ICA falsely claimed Russia soug ...[text shortened]... e the documents were recently declassified now you know why it is new. It was classified before now.
It might let you make friends in this administration, though.
@Metal-Brain saidTalk about the wrong end of the stick.
Presidents are always blackmailable so they can be controlled. That is why Trump admits Israel is starving children to death and does nothing about it.
https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-dirt-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-brother-mark-2105478
Trump could do something about it if he was free to do what he wanted to. Israel is dependent on the USA for weapons.
...[text shortened]... ailed he must approve of Israel starving children to death. What other conclusion could you come to?
@Metal-Brain saidVery strange "coverup". The NY times just yesterday ran an expose about the design details of Epsteins mansion. Not sure what you mean about the FBI?
We know it is a coverup. Powerful people are involved and to coverup for them I guess all involved must be covered up. It is a slap in the face to all of the victims since the predators go free.
Trump was likely doing young girls and Epstein had it on film. Now the FBI has it on film so the FBI is in on the coverup. The big question is who is blackmailing Trump with it?
@wildgrass saidBondi said the FBI had hundreds of thousands of videos. I posted the youtube link several times on here. Don't you remember?
Very strange "coverup". The NY times just yesterday ran an expose about the design details of Epsteins mansion. Not sure what you mean about the FBI?
@Suzianne saidIf they redacting Trump out of all the files how do you know it was Trump's name that was redacted? How does anybody know? Show me the redaction and how you can tell the absence of Trump's name is Trump.
Nobody, fool.
The Republicans have spent the last couple of weeks redacting Trump out of all the files. What did you think the delay was all about?
@Metal-Brain saidEww. You want those files released?
Bondi said the FBI had hundreds of thousands of videos. I posted the youtube link several times on here. Don't you remember?
All I am looking for is an effort to prosecute criminals. Stop it with the Obama treason nonsense and follow the Epstein money.
@wildgrass saidThe FBI has the evidence to prosecute criminals and they don't. That is my point. The FBI is protecting pedophiles.
Eww. You want those files released?
All I am looking for is an effort to prosecute criminals. Stop it with the Obama treason nonsense and follow the Epstein money.
This thread is not about obama. Speaking of follow the Epstein money, look into Whitney Webb because she says the real scandal is Epstein's money laundering.
@Metal-Brain saidI agree, the thread is not about Obama but we spent half the thread talking about him anyways. The trump administration wants us to focus on something else.
The FBI has the evidence to prosecute criminals and they don't. That is my point. The FBI is protecting pedophiles.
This thread is not about obama. Speaking of follow the Epstein money, look into Whitney Webb because she says the real scandal is Epstein's money laundering.
If Alan derschowitz made cash payments to Epstein and spent a lot of time with him, then he should be subpoenaed and asked questions about what those payments were for, under oath. We have multiple doj officials and multiple administrations who haven't done that. I don't know why and for some reason they have not been asked to explain themselves.
@wildgrass saidAlan Derschowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one point, so he could just say that is why he spent time with him. Tony Podesta does not even hide that he is a pedophile. He proudly has art in his home that is super creepy.
I agree, the thread is not about Obama but we spent half the thread talking about him anyways. The trump administration wants us to focus on something else.
If Alan derschowitz made cash payments to Epstein and spent a lot of time with him, then he should be subpoenaed and asked questions about what those payments were for, under oath. We have multiple doj officials and ...[text shortened]... en't done that. I don't know why and for some reason they have not been asked to explain themselves.
https://rumble.com/v6xohgo-super-creepy-art-hanging-in-fmr-clinton-advisor-s-foyer.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
What you should be talking about is Acosta and how he said he was told to back off Epstein because he "belonged to intelligence". That sounds like Epstein was working for the CIA to me. Why is nobody talking about how the CIA protected Epstein at first?
@Metal-Brain saidIdont know that story. Was Acosta the prosecutor in the case?
Alan Derschowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one point, so he could just say that is why he spent time with him. Tony Podesta does not even hide that he is a pedophile. He proudly has art in his home that is super creepy.
https://rumble.com/v6xohgo-super-creepy-art-hanging-in-fmr-clinton-advisor-s-foyer.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
What you should be talking about is Acosta an ...[text shortened]... n was working for the CIA to me. Why is nobody talking about how the CIA protected Epstein at first?
@wildgrass saidYes.
Idont know that story. Was Acosta the prosecutor in the case?
The Daily Beast and journalist Vicky Ward reported that Acosta told the Trump administration during the screening process for his current role that he was asked to cut a deal with Epstein because he was told the financier "belonged to intelligence," and that the issue was above his "pay grade."
https://www.newsweek.com/alex-acosta-epstein-sex-trafficking-department-labor-1448568
https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight/
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidAha I had heard there was a different lead prosecutor who was sidestepped to make the plea deal.
Yes.
The Daily Beast and journalist Vicky Ward reported that Acosta told the Trump administration during the screening process for his current role that he was asked to cut a deal with Epstein because he was told the financier "belonged to intelligence," and that the issue was above his "pay grade."
https://www.newsweek.com/alex-acosta-epstein-sex-trafficking-departm ...[text shortened]... 68
https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight/
Maybe the worst part of that situation was the judge who told Epstein after he plead guilty that he didn't have to register as a sex offender, allowing him to continue abusing while on work release.
Why did he do that?
That in and of itself should have been a crime.
I just looked up Acosta. Since he was deeply involved and apparently took part in secreteetings with Epsteins lawyers, Congress should talk to him. But their open investigation does not subpoena him, but instead they subpoena Hillary Clinton. 😂
At least they're not pretending to be serious.