@wildgrass saidEU is ditching Russia for our oil. I’ll watch that, you watch sleaze from which there will be nothing. Frankly, it is likely that the courts would never require that the Epstein files be released, because so many innocent people thousands that were involved in all of that coming and going would be hurt by that information for no reason.
Over 7 years long and 1,000 pages of declassified bipartisan reports on taxpayer funded investigations concluding no wrongdoing by Obama in Russia gate and y'all ain't had enough yet?
Epstein though. Very mysterious. He trafficked over a thousand women. Those women have named names of the involved criminals but no charges filed. No investigations whatsoever. Not a single leaked document other than bill Clinton's painting.
@AverageJoe1 saidMaybe we do 1100 more Hunter Biden posts and call it good?
EU is ditching Russia for our oil. I’ll watch that, you watch sleaze from which there will be nothing. Frankly, it is likely that the courts would never require that the Epstein files be released, because so many innocent people thousands that were involved in all of that coming and going would be hurt by that information for no reason.
I think it could be argued that the Jeffrey Epstein case was an example of prosecutorial misconduct. They arrested the guy and accuse him of running a massive criminal operation and then don't arrest any of the other criminals?
But that case needs to be made, I think. Otherwise the conspiracy theories will swirl about a coverup. The path for the Trump administration here is transparency. This can be done without exposing innocent people unnecessarily. Prosecutors do it all the time.
@wildgrass saidI noticed cnn mentioned this interview but only showed a small portion making him look guilty as usual when nothing he said hinted at this. This is the full question asked to him today.
Maybe we do 1100 more Hunter Biden posts and call it good?
I think it could be argued that the Jeffrey Epstein case was an example of prosecutorial misconduct. They arrested the guy and accuse him of running a massive criminal operation and then don't arrest any of the other criminals?
But that case needs to be made, I think. Otherwise the conspiracy theories will swi ...[text shortened]... cy. This can be done without exposing innocent people unnecessarily. Prosecutors do it all the time.
?si=TNB8AHL7w-SbIzVh
Is this being purposefully run like a reality TV show with cliffhangers and teasers? Accuse a former president of "treasonous conspiracy" and then don't produce any evidence to support that claim and just slink away hoping no one notices?
Other officials saying what they've seen will ‘shock you to your core’ and again, not saying what that thing is, just going to commercial break. These statements lead naturally to suspicion, mistrust, and cynicism.
@wildgrass saidIt's distraction from Epstein
Is this being purposefully run like a reality TV show with cliffhangers and teasers? Accuse a former president of "treasonous conspiracy" and then don't produce any evidence to support that claim and just slink away hoping no one notices?
Other officials saying what they've seen will ‘shock you to your core’ and again, not saying what that thing is, just going to commercial break. These statements lead naturally to suspicion, mistrust, and cynicism.
@wildgrass saidWhy are you so obsessed with political party? They both serve the super wealthy elites. 2 wings from the same corrupt bird.
Tulsi gabbard said Obama committed treason but her own political party said no wrongdoing 5 years ago.
The CIA runs this country. They run both parties.
@Metal-Brain saidI'm not obsessed with anything. Why would someone say no wrongdoing 5 years ago and now call the same thing a "treasonous conspiracy" if no additional evidence was presented?
Why are you so obsessed with political party? They both serve the super wealthy elites. 2 wings from the same corrupt bird.
The CIA runs this country. They run both parties.
@Arkturos saidEpstein hoax was invented by Michael Steele dossier to discredit trump because Greta thunberg was mad that the Epstein jet was not offsetting the carbon emissions.
Epstein never existed. The island and the temple never existed. It was all a long-game ruse to distract from something else . . .
Am I doing it right?
1 edit
@wildgrass saidWho is this someone? You need to be specific.
I'm not obsessed with anything. Why would someone say no wrongdoing 5 years ago and now call the same thing a "treasonous conspiracy" if no additional evidence was presented?
CIA Director John Brennan is in the middle of all of this. He is the guy that spied on congress, lied to them about it and later got away with it. None of this is new. I have known about it for years, but have you?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/12/a-brief-history-of-the-cias-unpunished-spying-on-the-senate/384003/
My point is that it doesn't necessarily have to be anything new. It just has to be new to people like you. The Russia collusion conspiracy theory was a hoax. It was a hoax to make Americans paranoid of Russia, forget about the Podesta emails, forget the emails exposed election meddling within the DNC (something you should be grateful for if Russia did hack the DNC and not Seth Rich) and make you support a proxy war with Russia via Ukraine. But above all it was so the CIA could look for dirt on Trump. That is why they spied on Carter Page.
I posted links showing children starving to death in Gaza weeks ago. Now that it is on mainstream news it seems new to most people. Because it took them at least 3 weeks to catch up to me. It is nothing new. It just seems new.
And why do you put faith in reports from politicians? You know just as well as I do politicians make a living lying to people. Do you have faith in the Warren Commission report too? How about the 911 report? Those cowards in congress will not even stand up to John Brennan. He spied on them, denied it and he did it and they let him get away with it.
Did you take the red pill or the blue pill?
2 edits
@Metal-Brain saidAccording no1, there were three separate investigations into whether Obama spied on Trump's campaign. The first two came from the senate and house, one partisan and one bipartisan. Both investigations concluded no wrongdoing.
Who is this someone? You need to be specific.
CIA Director John Brennan is in the middle of all of this. He is the guy that spied on congress, lied to them about it and later got away with it. None of this is new. I have known about it for years, but have you?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/12/a-brief-history-of-the-cias-unpunished-spying-on-the-s ...[text shortened]... it and he did it and they let him get away with it.
Did you take the red pill or the blue pill?
That wasn't good enough for Trump, so he hired John Durham to further investigate, and he did interviews and traveled internationally, and had access to every single document he asked for. He also concluded no wrongdoing by Obama. He pursued prosecutions on two involved parties, both ending in acquittals.
Now we have yet a 4th look-around at the documents, by the incoming DNI. But even there, there's no document that Tulsi presented that could be interpreted as "treasonous conspiracy". She just lied to you and every sheep that believed her.
So that's very different from the John Brennan case you brought up, in which the CIA admitted to spying but chose not to discipline the parties involved.