Go back
Which philosopher are you?

Which philosopher are you?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by telerion
No way. That verbose style is classic Hegel. The confusing repetition of words is strong Heidegger.

If you're right, then that site is rigged.
Nah, I was just being facetious in that I sometimes give long confusing answers.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lucifershammer
Plato (though that would not be my personal choice).

EDIT: It might be my avatar's, though!
Let me guess your personal choice.

Thomas of Aquino?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Hey I got David Hume too. Which is nice in a way since we're both Scottish.

I love Hume's description;

You are David Hume. You single-handedly made monkeys out of guys with a lot more education and experience than you, making you the most famous empirical skeptic who has ever existed. You believed that all ideas were merely copies of sensations, ...[text shortened]... the end of the day.

Maybe other can post the other descriptions? They'd be good to read!
Yes, I think I like hume to. I didn’t know much about him so I looked him up at wikipedia and I tend to agree with most of his idea's.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Lol, I'm Hume too, although I confess to the women and billiards as being a forethought of the test.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboard
Yes, I think I like hume to. I didn’t know much about him so I looked him up at wikipedia and I tend to agree with most of his idea's.
I particularly like his little idea about the child bron with no senses. Basically it goes like this;

Imagine a child is born without any sensory ability. It cannot see, feel, hear, smell or taste. Nothing. Imagine you keep this child alive until mental development would normally be complete. Does this child have a single thought running through it's head?

It's a great logical question! I mean the kid has nothing to compare anything with, and no source stimuli to think about. It doesn't have any language ability to think 'in'. I mean I think in english - i think! I guess it's like having a computer system without any bios or operating system. Or a keyboard!

Good stuff that man.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
I particularly like his little idea about the child bron with no senses. Basically it goes like this;

Imagine a child is born without any sensory ability. It cannot see, feel, hear, smell or taste. Nothing. Imagine you keep this child alive until mental development would normally be complete. Does this child have a single thought running through puter system without any bios or operating system. Or a keyboard!

Good stuff that man.
OMG I made up exactly that same thought experiment by myself after hearing this similar one from a friend: A person is born blind and gets to feel a cube and a sphere. Now the question is if he can point out the cube when he gains eyesight just by looking at the objects.

Amazing!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboard
Let me guess your personal choice.

Thomas of Aquino?
S. Thomas Aquinas, yes. Or at least Aristotle; several questions - particularly those dealing with reality - didn't seem to have a realist option.

Vote Up
Vote Down

G.W.F. Hegel here also
He may have had an ugly demise ,but at least he was married.
Like being married is something great.getting laid is something great.
One can only hope he got some before marriage.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Apparently, I'm Kant. It fits too, except for the dislike of wine and women.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Heidegger, I am the ex-nazi

Vote Up
Vote Down

I dunno, I changed my answers completely three times & I'm still Heidegger. I've never even read the bugger.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hume.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Hume.
Well if my test was coming up Hume so was yours!!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Heidegger the f... nazi (and I am German and a bit disturbed now).
I never been on the right wing. Seriously.

Interesting test.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by telerion
Yes, he would fit.
As in, it is fitting that Kant is included as an option, or Kant's writings fit my personality in some way?