@wildgrass saidCurious, indeed. maybe we should get Sonhouse to thresh this out for us. And ask him why this illegal does not take his family with him. He seems to be leaving them here. This is his choice.. aaaahh, all of this is his choice. Next you will saying that his grief is our problem.
There is no justification. That's been explicitly admitted by the administration.
@AverageJoe1 saidHis grief is not our problem? An "administrative error" right?
Curious, indeed. maybe we should get Sonhouse to thresh this out for us. And ask him why this illegal does not take his family with him. He seems to be leaving them here. This is his choice.. aaaahh, all of this is his choice. Next you will saying that his grief is our problem.
We taxpayers paid the government of El salvador in cash to imprison him for life. That's our problem.
@wildgrass saidLet's give this person a cell phone and move along with him.
His grief is not our problem? An "administrative error" right?
We taxpayers paid the government of El salvador in cash to imprison him for life. That's our problem.
If a guy breaks in my house.
I call police.
They, thank god, get him out of my house.
They make an error in the patrol car by taking this criminal to the wrong jail.
When do we give him his well-earned cell phone, and apologize for our error? By now, his property invasion is long forgotten, he has a good lawyer, and will sue the police department. The officer is fired. You see, THAT PART IS our problem. You and Maraduer side with the bad guys. Have you never noticdd that?
@AverageJoe1 saidConvoluted and weak.
Let's give this person a cell phone and move along with him.
If a guy breaks in my house.
I call police.
They, thank god, get him out of my house.
They make an error in the patrol car by taking this criminal to the wrong jail.
When do we give him his well-earned cell phone, and apologize for our error? By now, his property invasion is long forgotte ...[text shortened]... e, THAT PART IS our problem. You and Maraduer side with the bad guys. Have you never noticdd that?
2 edits
@sonhouse saidYou must have a different copy of the Constitution/Bill of Rights than I do:
US citizen or not, the constitution says PERSONS not CITIZENS. EVERY person has the right to due process of law and what Trump is doing is downright cruel and a clear abuse of power.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
"Persons" being persons born or naturalized in the United States, NOT some illegal chitsack in the country because they slithered across the border..
Try again.
2 edits
@Cliff-Mashburn saidTry the Fifth Amendment though it's Due Process clause is the same as the one in the 14th Amendment the difference being the 5th applies to the Federal government and the 14th to the States.
You must have a different copy of the Constitution/Bill of Rights than I do:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor ...[text shortened]... ue process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
EDIT: Guess the 5th says "no person" and the 14th "any person" if you want to nitpick.
@no1marauder saidI'm not the one nitpicking, you are.
Try the Fifth Amendment though it's Due Process clause is the same as the one in the 14th Amendment the difference being the 5th applies to the Federal government and the 14th to the States.
EDIT: Guess the 5th says "no person" and the 14th "any person" if you want to nitpick.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidYour interpretation of what you quoted is wrong.
You must have a different copy of the Constitution/Bill of Rights than I do:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor ...[text shortened]... es, NOT some illegal chitsack in the country because they slithered across the border..
Try again.
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
There are clearly two different clauses here. Before the semicolon refers to citizens. After the semicolon refers to any person.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidIt's always striking to me to observe how right wingers, who pretend to revere the Constitution, are so stunningly ignorant of what's in it.
I'm not the one nitpicking, you are.
Neither Due Process Clause is limited to citizens by their clear language.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidThumb up from Avjoe,
I'm not the one nitpicking, you are.
I'm getting exhausted with these champions of the underdogs. They are not supposed to be here, it is as simple as that. Notice not one proper response about my wanting to get the invaders out of my living room . That is because I am right, that they should be removed, and the libs here simply have nothing to respond with.
I have written about twelve questions this week, they answer none of them. I think I would not answer their questions, if they would only ask me something I asked one of their lot, are you more like a dem, or more like a republican. He answered, I swear that there are more than 2 parties. What in the hell. If I ask them about Pluto or Neptune, the 2 choices in a question, they would say in their faerie voices....'there are more than 2 planets'.
I'll try this. Which party (be it dems or repubs) is more likely to bring violence upon us when there is civil discord?
@AverageJoe1 saidFalse premises!
How does a tran prove if they are a tran? And, can a guy just tell an authority that he is a woman on Tuesday, and then be a man on Thursday, they a woman on Sunday? Or only be a a woman during sports events of his choice??? If he says he is a dog, do they still have to let him compete.?
Do you Wokes realize how you are screwing up our society??
I am a lot more ...[text shortened]... zy, huh? Ask Marauder if a man can change his sex on a daily basis. I have so many questions!!!!!
No one is doing that.
And oh, ok, 'woke' is now a noun.
How's it feel contributing to the dumbing down of America?
@AverageJoe1 saidWould you burn your house down if somebody trespassed in it?
Thumb up from Avjoe,
I'm getting exhausted with these champions of the underdogs. They are not supposed to be here, it is as simple as that. Notice not one proper response about my wanting to get the invaders out of my living room . That is because I am right, that they should be removed, and the libs here simply have nothing to respond with.
I have written ab ...[text shortened]... h party (be it dems or repubs) is more likely to bring violence upon us when there is civil discord?
That's essentially what you would do to the US economy if you deported every undocumented immigrant.
@no1marauder saidIf we want people from other countries to work here, (and the USA is th most popular county that all want to move to), we would put the word out and hire them. The illegals that are here have no effect. I woujld prefer to pick who lives and works here than have them pick us.
Would you burn your house down if somebody trespassed in it?
That's essentially what you would do to the US economy if you deported every undocumented immigrant.
@Suzianne saidThe fascists always presume to know what makes a real man and what makes a real woman, but when it comes to identifying who is a real human being and should be treated as such, they suddenly can't tell their ass from their elbow unless the individual in question is white or has the proper government-issued papers.
Inalienable rights are just that, they cannot be taken away.
This always trips up the fascists.
"Small government" conservatives say no one has rights unless they've been certified by the State.