09 Feb 23
@shavixmir saidDude, you claimed the gene vaccine was not called a gene vaccine countless times after being proved wrong countless times. Nobody is in denial more than you.
Dude, you claiming other people are in denial, is like Egypt claiming it don’t have da Nile.
10 Feb 23
@wildgrass saidhttps://newspunch.com/who-says-prepare-for-bird-flu-pandemic-following-gates-fauci-gain-of-function-research/
Frankenstein is fiction.
12 Feb 23
@metal-brain saidI think you are misremembering. Lab leak was and remains an unlikely origin of COVID.
No, it is likely and you are still in denial of that. You never said it was unlikely before, you said it was a conspiracy theory. Then after Biden, Fauci and everybody else admitted it was a good possibility you back paddled and changed your story.
No link has been found in the wild. It is a Frankenstein virus stitched together in a lab. Fauci funded gain of function r ...[text shortened]... o good at all. You cannot explain why because you have no idea why. You have faith and nothing more.
12 Feb 23
@wildgrass saidThat is not true at all. Why do you think the Biden administration and Fauci admitted it was possible after they were caught with their pants down so to speak?
I think you are misremembering. Lab leak was and remains an unlikely origin of COVID.
https://www.rt.com/usa/525430-fauci-zerohedge-covid-hiv/
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-jordan-faucis-emails-raise-questions-of-lab-leak-cover-up/
@metal-brain saidAnything is possible.
That is not true at all. Why do you think the Biden administration and Fauci admitted it was possible after they were caught with their pants down so to speak?
https://www.rt.com/usa/525430-fauci-zerohedge-covid-hiv/
https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-jordan-faucis-emails-raise-questions-of-lab-leak-cover-up/
@wildgrass saidAfter all of this time no natural origin has been found. That points to a genetically engineered origin. That means a genetically engineered origin is more likely.
Anything is possible.
A natural origin is very unlikely.
@metal-brain saidNot knowing the origin does not make an argument for knowing the origin.
After all of this time no natural origin has been found. That points to a genetically engineered origin. That means a genetically engineered origin is more likely.
A natural origin is very unlikely.
Virology labs in the US use packaging systems that are separate from the replication components. So the virus can infect, but cannot replicate. This makes their study extremely safe, and so any gain-of-function research would have a nearly impossible chance of leaking outside the lab.
I don't know enough about the current state of things in Wuhan labs. Certainly I would not trust newspunch.com for reliable information on this.
@wildgrass said“I don't know enough about the current state of things in Wuhan labs. “
Not knowing the origin does not make an argument for knowing the origin.
Virology labs in the US use packaging systems that are separate from the replication components. So the virus can infect, but cannot replicate. This makes their study extremely safe, and so any gain-of-function research would have a nearly impossible chance of leaking outside the lab.
I don't kno ...[text shortened]... of things in Wuhan labs. Certainly I would not trust newspunch.com for reliable information on this.
You dont know ANYTHING about wuhan labs.