1 edit
Originally posted by Sambo69I'd also like to see the reason why it was closed.
"Paying politicians for peace" - www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=47783
It seems one of the more readable threads in debates. [EDIT] The only possible reason that I can make out for it being closed is that it was started by Sambo69. Is that how the moderation works these days, BF?
D
Originally posted by RagnorakI also would like to see an explanation. And I also would like to see Stang's forum ban lifted until he commits another infraction of the rules. And then when he is banned again, as no doubt he will be, I 30 days is long enough. To me, 30 days seems long enough to ban a subscriber for any particular breaking of the rules.
I'd also like to see the reason why it was closed.
It seems one of the more readable threads in debates. [EDIT] The only possible reason that I can make out for it being closed is that it was started by Sambo69. Is that how the moderation works these days, BF?
D
Originally posted by DelmerMe too.
I also would like to see an explanation. And I also would like to see Stang's forum ban lifted until he commits another infraction of the rules. And then when he is banned again, as no doubt he will be, I 30 days is long enough. To me, 30 days seems long enough to ban a subscriber for any particular breaking of the rules.
STANG's ban has gone on for something like 6 months now !
(We could also see that he didn't break any rules when his ban was "accidently" lifted for a week).
1 edit
Originally posted by Sambo69Yes, but let me suggest that you are not helping any with four threads going all with this same title, three of which you started, and all in which you are posting.
Me too.
STANG's ban has gone on for something like 6 months now !
(We could also see that he didn't break any rules when his ban was "accidently" lifted for a week).
That's the kind of thing that probably makes banning an easier decision than otherwise. It certainly doesn't help in lifting a ban. You didn't need to start three threads with the same title.
Just a little friendly advice, Sambo.
Originally posted by DelmerI appreciate your advice. However, the three threads do refer to separate threads for which the same question is applicable but the answers may differ. The common heading draws attention. So-called "moderators" get away with it otherwise.
Yes, but let me suggest that you are not helping any with four threads going all with this same title, three of which you started, and all in which you are posting.
That's the kind of thing that probably makes banning an easier decision than otherwise. It certainly doesn't help in lifting a ban. You didn't need to start three threads with the same title.
Just a little friendly advice, Sambo.
Originally posted by aspviper666I remember trying that method. I complained about the moderation to the administration once and my reply was "I'm sorry, we don't get involved with the moderators or the forums."
Have you asked them via PM what the deal is??
I'm sure belguimfreak though gets 10-20 pms a day about moderation problems. He is probably so inundated that he wouldn't even be able to respond to any but the most serious ones.