Go back
why have certain threads been closed?

why have certain threads been closed?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Just out of curiousity, why do you tolerate STANG... er, Sambo69?

I was going to add examples of his blatant disregard for any and all authority... your's especially... however, somehow, this does not seem to be necessary. Xanthos has made an accurate observation regarding the fact that Sambo69 does not listen to any argument made, regardless of h ...[text shortened]... ees with him. He simply continues to use the RHP forums as a platform for his personal agenda.
Oh wow, that was original. It must be easy to hate STANG...er, Sambo69 when everyone else does.

Since when does a "blatant disregard for any and all authority" warrant banning? Since when is it bad? Next time you whine about Bush, think about that.

Nice, you quoted Xanthos. Another example of how original and non-conformist you must be.

Like I said before, Ad Populum is a ridiculous argument and a waste of space. It is too easy to conform to what everyone else feels by disliking sambo, and then regurgitating their ideas. Bravo

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
Oh wow, that was original. It must be easy to hate STANG...er, Sambo69 when everyone else does.

Since when does a "blatant disregard for any and all authority" warrant banning? Since when is it bad? Next time you whine about Bush, think about that.

Nice, you quoted Xanthos. Another example of how original and non-conformist you must be.

Like I sa ...[text shortened]... orm to what everyone else feels by disliking sambo, and then regurgitating their ideas. Bravo
And anti-Ad Populum is even more retarded (I must not agree with everyone else even if they are right).

STANG/Sambo has been told time and time again to quit it by the site admin. He hasn't. It earned STANG a permanent ban from the forums and hopefully it'll earn his new account the same.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Why bother? You don't listen.
So why has the thread on Inbred Pakistani's stayed ?



I know for a fact it was alerted by multiple users,and it is, out and out Racism.


The Mods have got their ideas completely back to front, and totally up their own arse.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
So why has the thread on Inbred Pakistani's stayed ?



I know for a fact it was alerted by multiple users,and it is, out and out Racism.


The Mods have got their ideas completely back to front, and totally up their own arse.
What does this have to do with this thread at all?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
What does this have to do with this thread at all?
Check the name of the thread, and the name of the guy who started it. . .seems obvious.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
And anti-Ad Populum is even more retarded (I must not agree with everyone else even if they are right).

STANG/Sambo has been told time and time again to quit it by the site admin. He hasn't. It earned STANG a permanent ban from the forums and hopefully it'll earn his new account the same.
Hehe, anti-Ad Populum, that's a good point. Are you a sentient computer program that monitors the forum board all day, posting in every thread?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
Hehe, anti-Ad Populum, that's a good point. Are you a sentient computer program that monitors the forum board all day, posting in every thread?
Out of Cheese Error.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Yeah ... STANGspam .. major issue for the RHP mod .. meanwhile the issue raised regarding what is considered a racist slur and what isn't has been brushed aside and apparently forgotten by BF.

Still waiting for the RHP list of PC racial slurs allowed .. and if American white males are the only race we're allowed to insult with racial slurs.

Maybe allow the Jews to be abused too, afterall, they ARE hated as much as we are in Europe aren't they?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
So why has the thread on Inbred Pakistani's stayed ?



I know for a fact it was alerted by multiple users,and it is, out and out Racism.


The Mods have got their ideas completely back to front, and totally up their own arse.
Thanks a lot huckleberryhound. Just becasue I'm not on the site every day, 24 hours a day, because I sometimes do things like sleep & work, and that means I'm "totally up [my] own arse". Cheers.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by belgianfreak
Thanks a lot huckleberryhound. Just becasue I'm not on the site every day, 24 hours a day, because I sometimes do things like sleep & work, and that means I'm "totally up [my] own arse". Cheers.
I'm beginning to understand the problem better .. are you the only mod?
If so, you are way over-matched .. but it does explain why the site is under moderated and given to a single POV

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
Oh wow, that was original. It must be easy to hate STANG...er, Sambo69 when everyone else does.

Since when does a "blatant disregard for any and all authority" warrant banning? Since when is it bad? Next time you whine about Bush, think about that.

Nice, you quoted Xanthos. Another example of how original and non-conformist you must be.

Like I sa ...[text shortened]... orm to what everyone else feels by disliking sambo, and then regurgitating their ideas. Bravo
I humbly beg your pardon, but, I disagree with STANGS approach for my own reasons. I'm hardly known for doing the 'popular' thing. I dislike STANG's arguments because they are repetetive, rarely his own material, poorly thought out, impossible to debate (because he refuse to do so) and meanignless spam.

I have avoided commenting on STANG for some time, but, I must admit that his forum vacation was a welcome change.

Quite honestly, an as I've told STANG in the past, I think he could be much more effective if he focused his political efforts on something other than spewing his rhetoric out on a Chess site. Come on now, surely there is a better use of his time and obvious enthusiasm.

Finally, and I suspect you may accuse me again of having an 'Ad Populum' opinion, I think that you are a numbnut.

Vote Up
Vote Down

It's interesting that there's been no responses specifically addresses the points in the 3rd post of this thread, nor other posts where I corrected my critics.

Vote Up
Vote Down

You're at it again Sambo.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
It's interesting that there's been no responses specifically addresses the points in the 3rd post of this thread, nor other posts where I corrected my critics.
Oh for the love of Allah Sambo would you just shut up!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Esoteric
Oh for the love of Allah Sambo would you just shut up!
When BelgianFreak publically and satisfactorily answers each point in the third post in this thread.