Go back
why have certain threads been closed?

why have certain threads been closed?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Derfel Cadarn
My post was deleted thanks to the Gestapo.
I must have missed that.Were they in uniform?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Enough leads to enough.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Derfel Cadarn
My post was deleted thanks to the Gestapo.
As well it should have been.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
As well it should have been.
It was the truth. I wonder who all reported it...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Derfel Cadarn
It was the truth. I wonder who all reported it...
Not me. I think I am on the mod ignore list. Ask Xan maybe he has a Mathematical equation to answer with. The gestapo has there vays you know.

Vote Up
Vote Down

And I'll probably get banned for calling the mods Gestapo.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Enough leads to enough.
Nothin' from nothin' leaves nothin'

0-0=x

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by aspviper666
Nothin' from nothin' leaves nothin'

0-0=x
Don't talk about Zero's that is a racial issue.

Vote Up
Vote Down

It's interesting that there's been no responses specifically addresses the points in the 3rd post of this thread, nor other posts where I corrected my critics.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by belgianfreak
All,

Some threads by a certain user have been closed. As is not uncommon, the user is feigning ignorance as to why and claiming "moderator corruption" even though they are fully aware as to why and have been warned by PM that some of their posting habits are unwelcome and, if continued, would result in action being taken to counter them.

In this ...[text shortened]... ntinued, tomorrow (when I am at work where I have the PMs filed).

Regards
BF
And this thread was closed because???

Thread 47783

I can't help but feel that it was closed because it was a sambo69 thread. There were multiple contributors, and it seems as though Redmike and Sambo were having civilised discourse right up until it was closed.

Fair enough closing threads for reasons as outlined below, but mods should be modding specific threads/posts, not specific users, surely? I don't think an attitude of "he peed me off in this thread, so I'm going to close ALL of his threads" is good modding.

I'm not claiming moderator corruption on a political level. And I'd also like to thank you for doing the job, but closing this thread can't have been the right decision, based on what I can see.

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
It's interesting that there's been no responses specifically addresses the points in the 3rd post of this thread, nor other posts where I corrected my critics.
Why bother? You don't listen.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
And this thread was closed because???

Thread 47783

I can't help but feel that it was closed because it was a sambo69 thread. There were multiple contributors, and it seems as though Redmike and Sambo were having civilised discourse right up until it was closed.

Fair enough closing threads for reasons as outlined below, but mods sho ...[text shortened]... ut closing this thread can't have been the right decision, based on what I can see.

D
Thanks. Warrants a reply from BelgianFreak. Seems that he only responds when I write things like ... "Bush is corrupt, a war monger and a threat to our security".

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by belgianfreak
All,

Some threads by a certain user have been closed. As is not uncommon, the user is feigning ignorance as to why and claiming "moderator corruption" even though they are fully aware as to why and have been warned by PM that some of their posting habits are unwelcome and, if continued, would result in action being taken to counter them.

In this ntinued, tomorrow (when I am at work where I have the PMs filed).

Regards
BF
Just out of curiousity, why do you tolerate STANG... er, Sambo69?

I was going to add examples of his blatant disregard for any and all authority... your's especially... however, somehow, this does not seem to be necessary. Xanthos has made an accurate observation regarding the fact that Sambo69 does not listen to any argument made, regardless of how persuasive, or, in some cases, even when it agrees with him. He simply continues to use the RHP forums as a platform for his personal agenda.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Just out of curiousity, why do you tolerate STANG... er, Sambo69?

I was going to add examples of his blatant disregard for any and all authority... your's especially... however, somehow, this does not seem to be necessary. Xanthos has made an accurate observation regarding the fact that Sambo69 does not listen to any argument made, regardless of h ...[text shortened]... ees with him. He simply continues to use the RHP forums as a platform for his personal agenda.
It's not that personal when many people feel the same way I do about a country of some 200,000,000 people who just invaded another country leading to the deaths of some 100,000 people (and inciting violence leading to the deaths of my own countrymen).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
It's not that personal when many people feel the same way I do about a country of some 200,000,000 people who just invaded another country leading to the deaths of some 100,000 people (and inciting violence leading to the deaths of my own countrymen).
No one cares how righteous your cause is. No one cares how mean big bad Mr. Bush is. We aren't telling you to shut up because your politics is wrong we're telling you to shut up because you are annoying.

You've been told by PM (as BF says in this thread) to quit it. You still won't. When will you learn STANG when will you learn?

Your cause does not justify the means.

Spamming leads to you getting banned. Again.