Go back
Why Not Capture Brits?

Why Not Capture Brits?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

So...

If the British sailors were trespassing and knew it, then their public statements are correct, and the British government is wrong for refusing to apologize.

But if the British sailors weren't trespassing but say they were, they are liars. Oh, but they are being coerced.

But if British military personnel can be coerced that easily without any sign of physicial discomfort, doesn't that make them complete wimps?

I just don't see any incentive for Iran not to do this over and over again. No matter what, Britain looks bad, and no consequences for Iran.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358


But if British military personnel can be coerced that easily without any sign of physicial discomfort, doesn't that make them complete wimps?
So if I can torture you without leaving any physical marks for the camera, that makes you a big girl's blouse, does it?

These sailors were most likely briefed beforehand that they could say whatever the hell they liked to get home - they're not special ops, these rules of engagement are generally known, and as it turns out, the crude use of propaganda (you'd think they'd be better at this after 27 years) has turned opinion against them in what is admittedly an ambiguous case.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
So...

If the British sailors were trespassing and knew it, then their public statements are correct, and the British government is wrong for refusing to apologize.

But if the British sailors weren't trespassing but say they were, they are liars. Oh, but they are being coerced.

But if British military personnel can be coerced that easily without do this over and over again. No matter what, Britain looks bad, and no consequences for Iran.
One way they've coerced "confessions" in the past has been by having one shipmate off camera with a gun to his head.
If you're alone, you might resist for awhile, but with a mates life in your hands, most of us would say whatever asked of us .. regardless. On top of that, they should be coached before hand that they can say just about anything. None of these lowly seamen will hold any State or military secrets to give up.

Have they shown ALL the captured servicemen on camera?

Could be that some of them are being tortured as I type, while there mates are being put in front of TV lights and "questioned."

The "complete wimps" you speak of are the ones who sent these guys out naked .. and deserted them.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amaurote
So if I can torture you without leaving any physical marks for the camera, that makes you a big girl's blouse, does it?

These sailors were most likely briefed beforehand that they could say whatever the hell they liked to get home - they're not special ops, these rules of engagement are generally known, and as it turns out, the crude use of propaganda (y ...[text shortened]... his after 27 years) has turned opinion against them in what is admittedly an ambiguous case.
I think you're right. From the people I have talked to, its common for soldiers to be told to do whatever it takes to make it home. Which means, give your captors no reason to kill you. If these soldiers are usefull for domestic propaganda, then they have a great chance of staying alive. Plus, a TV appearance might give someone an idea of where you are.

Also, I've been told that if you can do something to make them look bad without risking your life (not blatant) its a bonus. Slurred speech, etc. One of the sailors had said they were captured here (pointing to a spot on a map) "from what they've told us" or something to that effect. I don't remember the quote. It sounds to me like these sailors have taken their training very well. They deserve a heroes welcome when they get home.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
I think you're right. From the people I have talked to, its common for soldiers to be told to do whatever it takes to make it home. Which means, give your captors no reason to kill you. If these soldiers are usefull for domestic propaganda, then they have a great chance of staying alive. Plus, a TV appearance might give someone an idea of where you are.

Al ...[text shortened]... ors have taken their training very well. They deserve a heroes welcome when they get home.
OK, so with the point about "saying whatever is necessary to get home" well established...

What should the detainees in Guantanamo be saying in order to "get home"?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
OK, so with the point about "saying whatever is necessary to get home" well established...

What should the detainees in Guantanamo be saying in order to "get home"?
I have no idea. As I've said in another thread, my government should have processed those men long ago.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Well, I'm not sure. Iran and Great Britain aren't at war and the POW Code of Conduct doesn't apply strictly or logically. A "statement against the government" has different ramifications when that government is at war.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
It is a hard issue, and i hope when (or if) these service men and women get home, they are not penalised for being coerced into making this propaganda for the Iranians.
Clearly they have no choice.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
So...

If the British sailors were trespassing and knew it, then their public statements are correct, and the British government is wrong for refusing to apologize.

But if the British sailors weren't trespassing but say they were, they are liars. Oh, but they are being coerced.

But if British military personnel can be coerced that easily without ...[text shortened]... do this over and over again. No matter what, Britain looks bad, and no consequences for Iran.
It seems, wussy, that you've NEVER been hit by a bunch of thugs-with-badge on your torax and back, covered by a wet towel, which avoids marks... neither you've ever been electroshocked in your apparently small nuts (comapred with your BIG mouth).

You should go to a Latin American country and suffer in flesh the repression from the police force, highly trained in making you feel pain without leaving external marks.

I've seen it with my own eyes when I was working as a student with the local human rights commission in a place of Mexico I don't even want to remember.

I'm not even debating about this sailors issue, nor making any statement about the situation... I simply wanted to point out that your throat is connected to your intestine, ergo, you speak crap.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
... I simply wanted to point out that your throat is connected to your intestine, ergo, you speak crap.
"As a sudden silence settled over the room, Seitse wondered -- had he been thinking to himself, or had he actually spoken outloud?"

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Yeah, keep trying to do the funny thing. You know you said a stupidity.

I hope one day you suffer in flesh torture so you know what it feels like and stop saying nonsense.

I don't like you.

Edit. Well, I don't honestly wish it... I don't wish pain to anybody, really. But you get the point.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
Yeah, keep trying to do the funny thing. You know you said a stupidity.

I hope one day you suffer in flesh torture so you know what it feels like and stop saying nonsense.

I don't like you.
Well, I don't always agree with you, Seitse, but at least you are sincere.

I was raising a debate about politics, perception and propaganda in this thread. I don't think the British sailors have been tortured at all, although they may have been mislead by Iranian Intelligence.

The reality of true torture is that it is abhorrent and degrades both the victim and the tormenter. I am against it being used anywhere -- against soldiers, civilians, OR terrorists.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
Well, I don't always agree with you, Seitse, but at least you are sincere.

I was raising a debate about politics, perception and propaganda in this thread. I don't think the British sailors have been tortured at all, although they may have been mislead by Iranian Intelligence.

The reality of true torture is that it is abhorrent and degrades both t ...[text shortened]... tormenter. I am against it being used anywhere -- against soldiers, civilians, OR terrorists.
Its a sad state of affiars, but every country does torture people in the "name of the state".

Wheather its directly in the country such as above or being sent to another location such as the USA sending people via UK to Egypt for example, I perosnally think this will always happen and their is nothing that we can really do about it

Not much comfort for the victims....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
Well, I don't always agree with you, Seitse, but at least you are sincere.

I was raising a debate about politics, perception and propaganda in this thread. I don't think the British sailors have been tortured at all, although they may have been mislead by Iranian Intelligence.

The reality of true torture is that it is abhorrent and degrades both t ...[text shortened]... tormenter. I am against it being used anywhere -- against soldiers, civilians, OR terrorists.
Not debating this issue here.

Just got uncomfortable for that "coerced that easily without any sign of physicial discomfort" thing.

My worst memories are from seeing and talking to tortured people... many of them without a single, visible trace.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.