@AverageJoe1 saidWhy did Japan take it over at the onset of WW2 in the Pacific?
@AverageJoe1
Another way to put all this. The reason China doesn’t attack Philippines, there is nothing they want.
Hint: the answer to both is the same.
@Suzianne saidMy granny's good friend said the same thing.!!!!!
Your view of reality is as dim as it gets.
"Why Russia/China never threatened us with Nukes"
Why?
Because they have leaders that are adults, not petulant children.
My granny retorted 'It took an adult to kick Iran ass'. I hope that does not upset you, being a supporter of Iran.
@AverageJoe1 saidYour granny is delusional along with you. Sleepy don gave away a boat load. 400 Billion.
My granny's good friend said the same thing.!!!!!
My granny retorted 'It took an adult to kick Iran ass'. I hope that does not upset you, being a supporter of Iran.
@AverageJoe1 saidStop it with the false assertions. The Cuban missile crisis resulted in nuclear threats from both sides. it was a tense time.
Not really 'based on a falsehood'.. it is only my opinion. I think that there is no evidence anywhere that makes certain why we have never been threatened with Nukes. My comment is saying thank God for leaders like Reagan who have us fixed with nuclear capabiity, leading to my opinion.
What do you think would happen if Kamala or Hakeem or some liberal person took ...[text shortened]... leaders laying the groundwork for peace. Maybe Kamala would enjoy the plane ride, visit the bazaars?
@Metal-Brain saidHistorical treatises are small potatoes in todays world.
Stop it with the false assertions. The Cuban missile crisis resulted in nuclear threats from both sides. it was a tense time.
But go ahead and write a treatise and watch it lead to nowhere.... we are talking about why China North Korea or anybody does not attack USA.
Agree or disagree.....move along. I and I have already pointed out why they do not attack some countries that do not have nukes. So, please no more of that.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidAI overview
No idea . Nothing they want? They could take them in a heartbeat
The bottom 50% of taxpayers pay only 10% of income taxes. lucky guys
The top 10% of earners pay SEVENTY TWO PERCENT of taxes. 72%.
Hey, can we 'tax the rich' if they move away?
Just trying to make this stupid thread interesting.
Important Context & Nuances While these figures are factually accurate for federal income tax, economists and tax experts point out a few critical caveats needed to understand the full picture: Income Taxes vs. Payroll Taxes: Federal income tax is only about half of the federal government's revenue. Lower-income earners pay a disproportionately higher share of their income into payroll taxes (like Social Security and Medicare) and flat consumption taxes.
Tax Credits: The bottom 50% pays such a low share of income tax because many workers qualify for refundable credits, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), which often wipes out their entire income tax liability. Income Share: The top 10% pays 72% of the income taxes because they also earn a massive portion—nearly half—of the total national adjusted gross income (AGI)
You are still posting here which actually makes this thread stupid.
@KingDavid403 saidWe get it kingdavid
AI overview
Important Context & Nuances While these figures are factually accurate for federal income tax, economists and tax experts point out a few critical caveats needed to understand the full picture: Income Taxes vs. Payroll Taxes: Federal income tax is only about half of the federal government's revenue. Lower-income earners pay a disproportionately higher share ...[text shortened]... l adjusted gross income (AGI)
You are still posting here which actually makes this thread stupid.
@AverageJoe1 saidObviously you did not; until now. Either that or you are just a plain liar. Which is it smaller than average joe boy?
We get it kingdavid