@AverageJoe1 saidBecause it is not necessary.
Because WE have nuclear weapons. Peace through strength. Note that that phrase is one of the many phrases, such as self-reliance, that the liberals on this Forum never say.
Saying the words is like "Neener neener!" in poorer countries faces.
That is not what America used to be about.
Used to be, we actually helped those countries, instead of thumbing our noses at them.
But now we're in the Trump era. Insult everybody, all the time.
All I want for Christmas is a president who is an adult.
@Suzianne said………,and free stuff, and illegal alien invaders next door, (whom you support), No voter proof-of-citizenship, Iran to prevail over Trump, no matter the cost.
Because it is not necessary.
Saying the words is like "Neener neener!" in poorer countries faces.
That is not what America used to be about.
Used to be, we actually helped those countries, instead of thumbing our noses at them.
But now we're in the Trump era. Insult everybody, all the time.
All I want for Christmas is a president who is an adult.
New protest signs, megaphone, big wide glasses, crappy hairdo, a Sue Christmas.
I got a different list
Who is the Yboy Friend of yours Don’t really wanna know, watch out
@AverageJoe1 saidAnother one of your moronic posts. Peace through strenght is a term used for decades. Low grade post. And you have no friends.
Because WE have nuclear weapons. Peace through strength. Note that that phrase is one of the many phrases, such as self-reliance, that the liberals on this Forum never say.
- Joined
- 19 Oct 14
- Moves
- 156366
@AverageJoe1
There were constant 'threats' it was called the Cold War - what on earth are you talking about? It was called M.A.D. and it still exists...
1 edit
@beardmusic saidI am just the messenger. If you want to argue about this, I recommend marauder for a good debate..
@AverageJoe1
There were constant 'threats' it was called the Cold War - what on earth are you talking about? It was called M.A.D. and it still exists...
Russia has repeatedly made statements that many people interpret as nuclear threats. China certainly has nuclear weapons and occasionally uses harsh rhetoric, but it generally has not issued the same kind of direct nuclear threats toward the United States and officially maintains a no-first-use policy
Russia has repeatedly made statements that many people interpret as nuclear threats. China certainly has nuclear weapons and occasionally uses harsh rhetoric, but it generally has not issued the same kind of direct nuclear threats toward the United States and officially maintains a no-first-use policy
Being a nuclear threat is different than threatening nuclear war.
They are simply nuclear competitors, a whole lot different than what you suggest. Ask Suzianne.
- Joined
- 19 Oct 14
- Moves
- 156366
@AverageJoe1
The 'threat' is always implied/ implicit simply by having them - if you attack us we will respond in kind. Therefore, the title of this post is nonsense - that's my only point
@beardmusic saidWhere you been, man?
@AverageJoe1
The 'threat' is always implied/ implicit simply by having them - if you attack us we will respond in kind. Therefore, the title of this post is nonsense - that's my only point
Welcome back.
@AverageJoe1 saidI guess you don't know about the Cuban Missile Crisis
Because WE have nuclear weapons. Peace through strength. Note that that phrase is one of the many phrases, such as self-reliance, that the liberals on this Forum never say.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou should repeat yourself twice, not just once, that's what Trump does. You do wanna 'be like Trump', don't you?
I am just the messenger. If you want to argue about this, I recommend marauder for a good debate..
Russia has repeatedly made statements that many people interpret as nuclear threats. China certainly has nuclear weapons and occasionally uses harsh rhetoric, but it generally has not issued the same kind of direct nuclear threats toward the United States and officially m ...[text shortened]...
They are simply nuclear competitors, a whole lot different than what you suggest. Ask Suzianne.
Ever since he heard Obama say that an audience will remember what you say if you say it three times. He meant in an entire speech, not three times in a row, which is what Trump always does. This is how you can tell stupid people. They are always unclear on the concept.
Give it up, man. Trump will never love you, he doesn't care about you. If you are lucky he might let you iron his shirts.
@beardmusic saidI get, then, that you are saying that the USA has a standing policy of threatening the world's nations with nuclear war?
@AverageJoe1
The 'threat' is always implied/ implicit simply by having them - if you attack us we will respond in kind. Therefore, the title of this post is nonsense - that's my only point
just askin
@AverageJoe1 saidDo you understand anything?
I get, then, that you are saying that the USA has a standing policy of threatening the world's nations with nuclear war?
just askin
- Joined
- 19 Oct 14
- Moves
- 156366
@AverageJoe1
As I said, implicitly that is the whole point in having them, regardless of country. Not sure why this is so hard to comprehend...
@AverageJoe1 saidHow come China and Russia have never threatened Mongolia or the Philipines?
Because WE have nuclear weapons. Peace through strength. Note that that phrase is one of the many phrases, such as self-reliance, that the liberals on this Forum never say.