Wiped off the map?
22 Feb '12 01:40Originally posted by FMFWhen have I ever done that?
You also appear to be making assurances to us here about the nature of the Iranian nuclear programme.
You are seeing things.
Did you drop acid?
22 Feb '12 01:46Originally posted by Metal BrainYou said something about Romney and Santorum claiming Iran is a threat to other countries and that they are both campaigning on the claim that Iran should not have a nuclear program, even if there is no evidence that it is anything other than a peaceful nuclear power program and that this means that Romney is either a deliberate liar or a complete idiot.
Did you drop acid?
22 Feb '12 02:00Originally posted by Metal BrainYou certainly appear to be vouching for what Ahmadinejad says and means and, at the same time, for Iran's nuclear programme. That's why I used the expression "take responsibility". I don't think either of us need to look in a dictionary in order to understand the point I am making.
You need to look up the word responsibility in a dictionary. You obviously don't know the meaning of the word.
22 Feb '12 14:55Originally posted by FMFRomney said that Iran will get nuclear weapons under Obama. He made that statement without any evidence to support it.
You said something about Romney and Santorum claiming Iran is a threat to other countries and that they are both campaigning on the claim that Iran should not have a nuclear program, even if there is no evidence that it is anything other than a peaceful nuclear power program and that this means that Romney is either a deliberate liar or a complete idiot.
YouTube 22 Feb '12 18:44Originally posted by Metal BrainAnd yet Romney is probably right about Iran getting nuclear weapons sooner rather than later, and Obama (and Paul, for that matter) probably thinks so too.
Romney said that Iran will get nuclear weapons under Obama. He made that statement without any evidence to support it.
22 Feb '12 19:12Originally posted by FMFThat is mere speculation. Speculation is not evidence.
And yet Romney is probably right about Iran getting nuclear weapons sooner rather than later, and Obama (and Paul, for that matter) probably thinks so too.
22 Feb '12 23:18Originally posted by Metal BrainIf I were Iran I would be developing nuclear weapons and I would feel it was fully justifiable and necessary. If I were Leon Panetta - who knows - perhaps I would state that Iran was not working on a nuclear weapon.
That is mere speculation. Speculation is not evidence.
Leon Panetta stated that Iran was not working on a nuclear weapon. Did you watch that short film clip I provided?
23 Feb '12 04:51Originally posted by FMFOf course. Being in Club Nuke carries huge benefits to prestige and influence even though the weapons themselves are never used.
Would you be developing a nuclear deterrent if you were the Iranian leadership?
Back to Top