Go back
Women on Waves

Women on Waves

Debates



The post that was quoted here has been removed
Why are so many women fixated on killing babies? If reproduction isn't desired, there are lots of methods of contraception.


Originally posted by normbenign
Why are so many women fixated on killing babies? If reproduction isn't desired, there are lots of methods of contraception.
Not just women, but leftists everywhere. Killing that inconvenient baby is the ultimate shirking of personal responsibility to which they aspire. Calling such butchery a "reproductive health" service is Orwellian in the extreme.

1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I used to know a woman that had a "W" tattooed on each bum cheek and when she bent down it read... " WoW "🙂


Originally posted by normbenign
Why are so many women fixated on killing babies? If reproduction isn't desired, there are lots of methods of contraception.
Why are so many people fixated on treating injuries from car accidents? If getting involved in a car accident isn't desired, there are lots of methods of not driving.


Originally posted by normbenign
Why are so many women fixated on killing babies? If reproduction isn't desired, there are lots of methods of contraception.
They're not.
They're fixated on allowing women to decide what they want to do with their own bodies.


Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Why are so many people fixated on treating injuries from car accidents? If getting involved in a car accident isn't desired, there are lots of methods of not driving.
They're not.

You don't see organizations running around the world violating local laws to treat car accident victims. You see it with abortion because it makes a political statement and you know it.

If reproductive health were really the agenda, they'd get a hell of a lot more bang for their buck educating people on how to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Putting a Gdasnk woman on a ship and sailing out into the Baltic in order to suck the baby out of her costs a heck of a lot more and is a lot more risky than educating her to avoid the pregnancy in the first place.

Don't get me wrong: I'm not in favor of making early term abortion illegal. But this is more about politics and embarrassing countries that limit abortion rights than it is truly about reproductive health.


Originally posted by sh76
They're not.

You don't see organizations running around the world violating local laws to treat car accident victims. You see it with abortion because it makes a political statement and you know it.

If reproductive health were really the agenda, they'd get a hell of a lot more bang for their buck educating people on how to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Put ...[text shortened]... nd embarrassing countries that limit abortion rights than it is truly about reproductive health.
I never said I agreed with the methods of Women on Waves (I don't), I was just responding to normbenign's idiotic comment.

3 edits

1 edit


The post that was quoted here has been removed
=== So Sh76 apparently believes it's wrong to 'embarrass' Poland about its draconian anti-choice abortion laws. ===

On the contrary, I don't believe any such thing. Advocating a political position is neither inherently right nor inherently wrong. If the position is morally right, then advocating the position, perforce, is morally right and vice versa. Abortion is an extremely complex topic and I don't blame people who advocate either position.

Your post reinforces my perception that WoW is more about politics than health.

1 edit


Classifying abortions as women's health is by definition political.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down


The post that was quoted here has been removed
As I said.

Someone dies in every abortion. In the abortion you describe two people die.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.